Category: Featured

  • DOL Issues Report on Coercive Contractual Provisions

    DOL Issues Report on Coercive Contractual Provisions

    by CUPA-HR | October 22, 2024

    On October 17, the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of the Solicitor (SOL) issued a Special Enforcement Report on “coercive contractual provisions.” The report lists several provisions they have seen included in employment contracts that the department believes “may discourage workers from exercising their rights under worker protection laws.” The report demonstrates recent actions taken by SOL to combat such provisions, but it does not include new enforcement actions against employers that use these provisions.

    In the report, SOL claims the provisions discussed are coercive, violate the law and have significant impacts on the most vulnerable workers. The report details seven types of contractual provisions they find especially concerning:

    1. Contractual provisions requiring workers to waive statutory protections, including those requiring workers to waive their rights to bring claims and recover damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act
    2. Contractual provisions that purport to require employees to agree that they are independent contractors
    3. Indemnification-type provisions and related counterclaims purporting to shift liability for legal violations to workers or other entities
    4. “Loser pays” provisions attempting to require employees to pay the employer’s attorney’s fees and costs if the employees do not prevail in litigation or arbitration
    5. “Stay or pay” provisions, including some training repayment assistance provisions, that purport to require workers to pay damages to their employer for leaving a contract early
    6. Confidentiality, non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions
    7. Company policies that purport to require workers to report safety concerns to their employer before contacting any government agencies

    The report emphasizes that the Department of Labor is “not bound by private contracts or arbitration agreements between workers and employers” and thus “has a unique role to play in fighting the use of these ‘fine print’ or ‘coercive’ contractual provisions.” It provides examples of cases where the courts have found such agreements unenforceable or where DOL has pursued an injunction in federal court seeking an order blocking one or more contract provisions.

    Importantly, the report is largely a restatement of current law and, for the most part, does not outline new enforcement actions against employers for using these provisions. Instead, the report outlines the work SOL has done recently to fight against the coercive contractual provisions, including cases and amicus briefs filed against employers using such business practices.

    CUPA-HR will continue to monitor for additional resources from the Department of Labor that may impact contractual labor provisions.



    Source link

  • Indiana University Faculty Who Focus on Student Engagement Using Top Hat See 11.5% Decrease in Student Withdrawal Rate

    Indiana University Faculty Who Focus on Student Engagement Using Top Hat See 11.5% Decrease in Student Withdrawal Rate

    Course withdrawals carry significant academic and financial consequences for students and universities. Studies consistently demonstrate that withdrawing from first-year courses can greatly increase a student’s risk of discontinuing their studies, reducing their likelihood of completing a degree (Akos & James, 2020).

    TORONTO – October 22, 2024 – Top Hat, a leading provider of student engagement solutions for higher education, has released the first significant finding in an ongoing research initiative with Indiana University exploring the impact of student engagement leveraging Top Hat on retention and academic outcomes. The study, involving an analysis of hundreds of courses from the Spring, Summer, and Fall semesters of 2023, observed that the use of Top Hat by instructors resulted in an 11.5 percent decrease in the mean student withdrawal rate compared to similar course types without using the platform. In absolute numbers, this would equate to approximately 289 of the sampled Indiana University students continuing their course work during the 2023 academic year. The findings highlight the positive impact of integrating Top Hat into course delivery on student retention, particularly in introductory courses that often have higher drop-out rates.

    The Top Hat platform empowers educators to use frequent low stakes assessments to increase student engagement during lectures through interactive polls, quizzes, and discussions. The use of frequent low stakes assessments have been shown to improve student confidence, academic outcomes and retention (Meer & Chapman, 2014). The principles of active learning can also be extended outside of class through Top Hat Pages, a content editing and personalization tool that enables instructors to create or customize their own interactive learning materials. Every interaction is captured by the platform, providing students with real-time feedback, while empowering faculty with data-driven insights they can use to identify struggling students and improve the impact of their instruction.

    “Indiana University is deeply committed to the success of our students, and the findings from this research demonstrate how the thoughtful integration of instructional technologies has contributed to strengthening our undergraduate retention,” said Gina Londino-Smolar, Ed.D., Teaching Professor at IU Indianapolis. “Implementing active learning and frequent assessment, which have been shown to improve student outcomes, has been an important focus for us and our partnership with Top Hat has been instrumental in enabling us to scale these practices across our institution, ensuring a consistent, high quality learning experience for our students.”

    The study’s primary objective is to evaluate the influence of Top Hat on various student outcomes, with an initial focus on withdrawal rates—a key indicator of student success. The collaborative research project, approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), involved analyzing data from thousands of individual courses. From the original large dataset, similar courses based on discipline and level were identified in order to equalize the sample size and undertake a more accurate analysis. After filtering the dataset, 235 unique Top Hat courses were compared against a similar set of 235 unique courses that did not use Top Hat.

    Indiana University began working with Top Hat in 2017 and, based on high rates of faculty adoption, made the decision to offer the platform free of charge to all students by entering into an enterprise license agreement the following year. By addressing concerns around equity, student affordability and ensuring compliance with respect to data privacy and standards for web accessibility, adoption has increased substantially. For the 2023/2024 academic year 1,022 faculty and 51,679 students across more than 1,900 individual courses from all nine IU campuses used Top Hat to enhance learning.

    “This study reinforces the importance of providing faculty with tools that make evidence-based practices, like active learning, easier to adopt,” said Maggie Leen, CEO of Top Hat. “The data speaks for itself—when instructors have access to the tools to support effective teaching methods, it can lead to stronger student engagement and higher persistence. We’re proud to be part of Indiana University’s efforts to increase on-time graduation rates for their students.”

    The 2030 IU Strategic Plan has one pillar dedicated to Student Success and Opportunity with a commitment to student affordability and experience throughout their educational journey to have success in the workplace and beyond. The incorporation of Top Hat to engage students with the course content, reducing withdrawal rates, can be seen as a direct contribution to the pillar for student success.

    Since its founding in 2009, Top Hat has continued to introduce new features to make proven teaching methods more accessible to instructors. Most recently, Top Hat announced the release of Ace, an AI-powered teaching and learning assistant that enables instructors to generate assessment questions and discussion prompts based on their lecture slides and course materials. As a personalized study assistant, Ace allows students to break down challenging concepts, find guidance tackling difficult homework assignments, and create on-demand practice questions they can use to prepare for high stakes assessments. 

    The initial findings will inform both Indiana University and Top Hat’s future strategies for enhancing student outcomes. The research initiative is currently focused on identifying patterns of usage by instructors across disciplines and their impact on student engagement and academic performance. Ongoing analysis is exploring the impact of Top Hat on the academic experience of various student populations, including historically underrepresented groups with a focus on how the platform supports equitable access to learning, improves engagement, and contributes to closing achievement gaps.

    About Indiana University

    Indiana University (IU) is one of the nation’s leading public research universities, with 90,000 students across 930+ academic programs, seven campuses, two regional academic centers and nine School of Medicine campuses. Since 1820, Indiana University has helped students create brighter futures while also driving innovation, from breakthroughs in DNA technology to cancer research to trailblazing cultural programs and resources. IU is home to world-class academics with the country’s largest medical school, the world’s first school of philanthropy, the top-ranked Kelley School of Business and O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, the nation’s first school of informatics. The university’s campuses are united by IU 2030, an aspirational vision for a bold and ambitious future focused on student success and opportunity, transformative research and creativity, and service to the state of Indiana and beyond. Learn more at iu.edu.

    About Top Hat

    As the leader in student engagement solutions for higher education, Top Hat enables educators to employ proven student-centered teaching practices through interactive content and tools enhanced by AI, and activities in in-person, online and hybrid classroom environments. To accelerate student impact and return on investment, the company provides a range of change management services, including faculty training and instructional design support, integration and data management services, and digital content customization. Thousands of faculty at 750 leading North American colleges and universities use Top Hat to create meaningful, engaging and accessible learning experiences for students before, during, and after class.

    Contact [email protected] for media inquiries.

    Source link

  • Key Findings from the 2025 Landscape of Higher Education Report  

    Key Findings from the 2025 Landscape of Higher Education Report  

    As higher education navigates demographic shifts, new technologies, and economic challenges, institutions face a complex landscape when optimizing enrollment and meeting the evolving needs of students. The 2025 Landscape of Higher Education Report provides actionable insights that empower educational leaders to improve learning pathways and better serve the Modern Learner.

    Challenges such as the rising education costs have led to increased scrutiny of a college degree’s value, with only 47% of Americans considering it worthwhile without loans. When loans are involved, this number drops to 22%, underscoring the imperative for institutions to adapt to more cost-effective pathways.

    The 2025 Report offers a future-oriented outlook, equipping institutions with data to address gaps and better understand the evolving profile of the Modern Learner. Themes include shifting student preferences, an increased emphasis on career-aligned programs, and the need for more flexible learning pathways. In this article, explore six key findings that are molding students’ educational journeys and how these trends can enable education leaders to adapt.

    Finding #1: Flexible Pathways Drive Enrollment Growth 

    Spring 2024 saw a 2.5% increase in undergraduate enrollment, particularly within community colleges, public institutions, and associate degree-granting baccalaureate institutions (PABs). Graduate programs also saw enrollment increases, with a 3% rise. The highest areas of growth occurred among private, for-profit four-year institutions. These trends indicate a growing demand for flexible learning pathways that accommodate different student preferences and career aspirations.

    The age profile of part-time students has shifted as well, with the median age of part-time undergraduate students decreasing by nearly 2% across all sectors since Spring 2020. The shift was most pronounced at public two-year institutions, which saw a 4.2% decrease, and private accredited bachelor’s programs, which experienced a 2.8% decrease. As the age of part-time students continues to trend younger, it reaffirms that age is no longer a reliable predictor of learning modality. Furthermore, these shifting demographics emphasize the importance of embracing a Unified Enrollment Strategy that engages with Modern Learners based on their preferences and behaviors to meet them where they are with the right message, in the right place at the right time.

    Finding #2: Modern Learners are Prioritizing Practical Skills and Career Outcomes

    The emphasis on practical skills and career-readiness is reshaping Modern Learners’ educational preferences. With nearly half of Americans questioning the value of a traditional college degree, the demand for flexible, affordable, and industry-aligned options is growing rapidly. Apprenticeships have emerged as an appealing pathway for Modern Learners, offering paid opportunities for hands-on learning and gaining practical skills without the burden of taking on additional debt. 

    Over the past decade, the number of apprenticeships in the U.S. has more than doubled, from approximately 317,000 to 640,000. Sectors such as Construction and Public Administration have led this growth with 34.5% and 22.4% increases, respectively. High-growth fields like Healthcare, Finance, and Technical Services present additional opportunities for expanding apprenticeship programs, aligning well with workforce demands and students’ increasing preference for practical, job-ready experience.  

    Despite apprenticeships’ increasing appeal, accessibility poses a challenge. While 75% find apprenticeships appealing, only 29% find them accessible. Geographic location, program availability, and a lack of awareness remain barriers that can prevent students from participating. Institutions can remove these barriers through strategic partnerships with industry leaders to expand opportunities, integrate practical skill-building in program curriculums, and market available programs to raise awareness. These efforts not only meet the demands of Modern Learners by providing them with relevant skills, but also enable employers to recruit qualified candidates, making apprenticeships valuable for both higher education and the economy.

    Finding #3: Student Demand for Alternative Credentials Continues to Rise 

    Much like apprenticeships, the rising demand for alternative credentials like certificates further underscores the shifting preference towards more flexible and affordable learning pathways. As students continue to seek programs that offer practical skills and immediate benefits for their careers, certificates have increasingly become an attractive alternative to traditional degree paths. With the cost of higher education on the rise, Modern Learners are turning to certificate programs as a focused and affordable way to gain relevant skills for their desired career industries.

    Spring 2024 saw significant growth in certificate enrollments, with graduate programs seeing a nearly 10% increase and undergraduate certificates growing by nearly 4%. This growth reinforces that Modern Learners are increasingly prioritizing education opportunities that yield a high return-on-investment. Institutions can capitalize on this interest by expanding certificate offerings and making them more accessible to students through diverse modalities, competitive pricing, and aligning programs with job demands.  

    Finding #4: Dual Enrollment Programs Gain Momentum Among High School Students

    Dual Enrollment programs are becoming increasingly popular pathways, as more young learners seek flexible avenues for higher education. The popularity of these programs aligns with the growing trend of younger students engaging in part-time studies, demonstrating a trend towards more adaptable educational modalities. Dual enrollment has increased over 10% over the last year alone, adding approximately 100,000 students and accounting for nearly 28.1% of undergraduate enrollment increases. This growth presents a crucial opportunity for institutions to leverage this interest as they develop enrollment strategies going into 2025.

    Finding #5: The Some College, No Credential (SCNC) Population Presents a Growing Opportunity for Re-Engagement

    The Some College, No Credential (SCNC) population, now at 36.8 million and growing by 2.9% from the previous year, represents a significant opportunity for enrollment growth. With re-enrollment rising by 9.1% in the 2022-2023 academic year, institutions have a chance to attract students who left before completing their degrees.

    Understanding the educational preferences of SCNC students is key to tailoring outreach and support services. Popular fields of study for this group include Business and Liberal Arts at the bachelor’s level, Liberal Arts and General Studies for associate degrees, and Health professions and Business for undergraduate certificates. These areas indicate a clear demand for programs that offer clear pathways to employment. To effectively engage this population, institutions should focus on building accessible options that allow students to build upon previously earned credits, prioritize transfer credits, and offer support that enables students to advance in their chosen career fields.

    Finding #6: International Student Enrollment Boosts Institutions’ Global Appeal

    The growing population of international students enrolled at U.S. schools presents a valuable opportunity to enhance universities’ presence and grow enrollments.  These students comprise of a significant share of enrollments, particularly in Massachusetts, Hawaii, New York, and California, where they account for 4.5% to 7.8% of the student population. Most undergraduate international students are enrolled within the public sector, underscoring its position to support higher education on a domestic and international scale.

    To maximize the benefits of international student enrollment, institutions should focus on strategies that attract and retain international students while providing support services tailored to their unique needs. By integrating a comprehensive enrollment and student support system with resources like language assistance, housing support, and financial aid, institutions can boost their global appeal, create more culturally diverse campuses, and enhance their enrollment by positioning themselves as a top choice for students worldwide.

    Looking Toward 2025

    The findings from the 2025 Landscape of Higher Education Report demonstrate both the challenges and opportunities shaping the future of higher education.

    As institutions look ahead, the ability to attract and retain students across a range of educational paths requires a holistic approach to enrollment and student support services. By focusing on creating accessible, cost-effective, and relevant learning opportunities, institutions can position themselves for success in 2025 and beyond, while meeting the diverse needs of Modern Learners and driving sustainable enrollment growth.

    For more insights and actionable strategies, download the full 2025 Landscape of Higher Education Report and see how your institution can stay ahead of the curve.

    Source link

  • It’s mid October, PED. Where is the data?

    It’s mid October, PED. Where is the data?

    Last month on September 19, the Public Education Department presented to the Legislative Education Study Committee slide decks showing preliminary, high-level results of the state’s spring assessments, promising that detailed data would be forthcoming soon thereafter.

    A month has passed and the PED has released nothing further. No district- or school-level data files or presentations. Not even a press release. The school year is one-quarter over and the public is being kept in the dark about the state of New Mexico’s schools?

    Repeated outreach by New Mexico Education to the PED has been met with silence. The one PED data slide presented showed that statewide, there was incremental improvement in reading – from 38 percent proficient in 2023 to 39 percent proficient in 2024, a decline in math (from 24 percent proficient to 23 percent), and a three percentage-point increase in science (from 34 percent to 37 percent).

    A companion presentation by LESC staff contained richer data, but also showed different proficiency rates than the PED deck – reading at 38 percent proficient and math down to 22 percent proficient.

    The LESC deck also contained some graphs that merit a deeper dive, which is impossible unless and until PED releases the data files. For example, the achievement gaps between economically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students in English Language Arts closed significantly statewide. 

    This occurred both because economically disadvantaged students’ ELA scores increased by five percentage-points (and nine percentage-points since 2022), and because more affluent students saw their ELA scores decline by five percentage-points.

    Ideally, gaps should close because those on the lower end are making big gains, not because those at the higher end are dropping.

    Without detailed data, it is not possible for researchers to dive in to determine why and where these changes are occurring.

    National education researcher Chad Aldeman recently wrote on his Substack blog that this practice of hiding or delaying data has become a nationwide trend among state education departments.

    “Here we are in pumpkin spice / decorative gourd season, and half the states still have not released their results yet,” Alderman wrote. “To put it colloquially, this is too damn slow! Summer is the key here—it’s the time when parents and educators could actually do something about the results. By the time fall rolls around, kids are already back in school and they’ve moved on to the next grade. Teachers have already written their lesson plans for the year….

    …“When it comes to releasing their results, too many states are putting parents last,” Aldeman wrote. “This game of telephone is also unnecessary in today’s modern world. Most state assessments are now administered on computers and can be scored instantaneously. Private testing companies like the ACT and SAT promise to deliver results in 2-4 weeks.”

    According to Aldeman’s research, last year the PED didn’t release its data until mid-November, which ranked New Mexico 45th out of the 50th states. 

    Will this year be any different?

    Source link

  • Top 10 Challenges Faced by Principals: Staffing & Engagement

    Top 10 Challenges Faced by Principals: Staffing & Engagement

    Tune In To Our Audio Blog

     

    Principals are facing challenges each day toward improving student achievement on campus. Every principal face some of the biggest frustrations to control student behavior, recruiting teachers and staff, promoting personalized learning, improving teaching effectiveness, student retention, parent support, and more. 

     

    Technology integration translates into enhanced student achievement

    21st-century classrooms strengthen tech-savvy teachers with the most advanced cloud, mobile, and digital technologies to teach and interact with students using videos, chat, notifications, social media, and email messaging. Creating future-ready classrooms and higher education institutions with the use of cutting-edge augmented reality systems in the classroom can enrich the learning process and improve student achievement.

    Principals are faced with complex and difficult challenges to turn around the campus with academic underperformance. Here is a list of the top 10 challenges and successful strategies to promote student growth and success.   

     

    1.  Paperwork

    Paperwork and forms are one of the biggest frustrations of principals. Eliminate paperwork and automate data collection processes through online forms and applications for admission, course evaluations, and more to reach out to more students in a positive manner.

     

    2.  Decision-making

    Principals’ decisions and strategies are critically important to institutional performance. They are accountable for high levels of student achievement. In order to accomplish the high expectations, administrators have to analyze data through dashboards and reports to identify factors related to student enrollment, retention, and success. There is clear evidence through insightful reports that the attributes of the institution such as admission, enrollment, attendance, discipline, grades, fee collections, etc. determined those outcomes.     

     

    3.  Scheduling 

    Classroom teachers, staff, and students report scheduling problems with principals. Cognitive reframing of scheduling with an automated timetable system enables instructors to manage class schedules across multiple courses, faculty and rooms for different time periods. Innovative scheduling can help alleviate conflicts in manual scheduling and place substitutes for teachers in order to maintain continuity of instruction. 

     

    4.  Recruitment

    Recruiting competent teachers who are capable of teaching all student populations is at the core of the problem. In successful institutions creating an advanced student admission system with real-time application tracking, online assessments, and an automated ranking system always identified the talented and sensitive teachers who demonstrated competency, will, and commitment to implement innovative and high-quality education programs and deliver excellence for all learners.  

     

    5.  Faculty Evaluation

    Teachers are vulnerable individuals who are struggling to align instruction and assessments to the learning context of a diverse student population. Creating instructions in innovative ways and building flexibility in the curriculum will be easier for students to rest with the teacher. Using a faculty evaluation system, creating faculty peer evaluation reviews through online surveys will benchmark teaching effectiveness. Based on the evaluation feedback score, training and improvement action plan for the benefit of faculty can be chalked out to improve teaching performance and cohesiveness. 

     

    6.  Attendance & Discipline 

    Principals perceive student absenteeism and misconduct are a major concern. Educational institutions can improve class attendance and improve students’ poor academic records using RFID and Biometric based attendance tracking systems to monitor student movements in real-time. Maintaining order and discipline and controlling violence, vandalism, bullying, racism, etc. in the campus using sophisticated discipline trackers that will capture incidents from mobile devices and notify authorities in real-time and ensure student safety.     

     

    7.  Curriculum Design 

    Principals are faced with the critical task of teaching a curriculum that is comprehensive and more encompassing. Curriculum mapping software provides the technology tools for executing changes in the curriculum design and syllabus. Principals and teachers can create customized outcome-based education that will map competencies, graduate attributes, and standards to improve learning outcomes. Students can develop skills and competencies that is aligned with course outcomes. 

     

    8.  Student outcomes

    One of the biggest factors that stood out is related to student achievement. Principals want to promote learning and see better student outcomes. With cutting-edge academic planning tools, administrators can create a personalized learning plan with goals and tasks linked to lessons to meet the precise requirement of students, which can improve learning outcomes and ensure student success. Using online assessments including assignments, tests, quizzes, and surveys will be of great help to students and teachers alike. Using online and mobile devices, teachers can measure students’ progress in real-time and share the results with parents through instant notifications via email and SMS alerts.  

     

    9.  Parental Involvement

    One of the biggest frustration faced by principals is that parental involvement is lacking to support the institution’s effort toward improving student achievement. Parents also have to take joint responsibility for the poor grade of their children. Using real-time status notifications for events, meetings, grades, fee collection, attendance, and discipline via web and mobile devices can improve interactions between teachers and parents and close the achievement gap.

     

    10.  Communication & Collaboration

    Principals and staff spend so much energy on building relationships with students, teachers, and staff. Powerful communication tools like discussion forums, chat, messaging and social media will have a positive impact on the institute community and promote collaborative learning.

    Source link

  • 5 Ways to Advocate for Your Students During The U.S. Election

    5 Ways to Advocate for Your Students During The U.S. Election

    Election Day in the U.S. is just around the corner. On top of carrying multiple academic and employment responsibilities, some students will also be voting for the first time. Others, such as those from marginalized or historically underrepresented populations, may be overwhelmed with what the election results could mean for them. In the lead up to Election Day, a healthy dose of empathy will be essential in ensuring students have a chance to fulfill their civic duty—and the opportunity to consider its consequences.

    Being flexible with due dates, considering students’ wellbeing and ensuring learners are armed with the resources needed to vote are the most important things you can do as Election Day nears. Read on to learn how professors advocated for their students during the 2020 election—and how you can do the same.

    Consider making November 4 and 5 free of assignments (or even classes)

    Exams can cause some students a great deal of stress and anxiety. Lillian Horin, Biological and Biomedical Sciences PhD student at Harvard University, urges educators to keep BIPOC students in mind when scheduling high-stakes tests.

    Consider swapping your exams or problem sets (Psets) with a trip to the ballot box. Jacob Light, Economics PhD student at Stanford University, writes that this simple gesture may allow students to exercise their civic duty.

    Other students like Anna-Sophia Boguraev, Bioengineering PhD student at Harvard Medical School and MIT, say that TAs have the power to amplify student concerns and requests—none of which should be ignored.

    If your assignments can’t wait, build in flexibility and timeliness

    Self-paced learning can allow students to visit the polls and complete coursework at a time that works for them—so says Jesse Fox, Associate Professor of Communication at Ohio State University.

    Election Day can also be a good opportunity to let students catch their breath in your course. Give students a chance to study and review material that they haven’t had a chance to look over, suggests Scott Grunow, Instructor in English and Religious Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

    Should your institutions provide little leeway in your assessment choices, at least incorporate real-time events into your discussions. Derek Bruff, Associate Director, Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of Virginia, notes that relating course content to the election can help students see the value of what they’re learning.

    Real-time political events and policy proposals can make for discipline-specific conversations. This also allows students to apply what they’ve learned in your class to the real world, as Andrea Gomez Cervantes, Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at Wake Forest University, proposes.

    Mobilize your students to show up at the polls

    Gen Z students are motivated to vote. In the 2018 midterm elections, the student turnout rate increased by 20 percent compared to the 2014 midterms.1 Ensure students are equipped with the resources to vote as soon as possible, writes Wendy Christensen, Sociology Professor at William Paterson University.

    Similarly, ask students about their voting plans. Consider working with your class to ensure they know where to go on November 5, suggests Margaret Boyle, Associate Professor of Romance Languages and Literatures at Bowdoin College.

    Ensure your voter registration information and resources appeal to all students, regardless of what political party they support. Meghan Novisky, Assistant Professor of Criminology at Cleveland State University, emphasizes the importance of using non-partisan guidelines.

    Some scholars like Sara Wheeler-Smith, Associate Professor of Management at Manhattan College, even plan to offer a grading incentive for visiting the polls.

    Incorporate guest lectures and learn from your colleagues

    Navigating election week with students in mind might be an unfamiliar undertaking. Consider leaning on faculty at your institution for support, writes Heather Mayer, Director of Educational Technology at Everett Community College.

    Some students may be undecided voters, while others may have missed the presidential debates. Incorporate forms of debate in your classroom—with the support of scholars from other institutions, as Yujin Jung, Political Sciences PhD student at the University of Missouri, plans to do.

    Keep in mind the importance of mental and physical health

    Check-ins with students have gained new meaning in the midst of an election. Andrea Kelley, Sociology Professor at the University of Michigan, tends to her students’ socioemotional needs before assigning readings and lectures.

    Election Day can come with a range of emotions for many students. Cate Denial, Distinguished Professor of American History, Chair of the History department, and Director of the Bright Institute at Knox College, removes the expectation for students to pay attention and participate in class.

    References

    1. Thomas, N. et al. (2018). Democracy Counts 2018: Increased Student and Institutional Engagement. Tufts University. https://idhe.tufts.edu/sites/default/files/DemocracyCounts2018.pdf

    Tagged as:



    Source link

  • Department of Labor Publishes AI Framework for Hiring Practices

    Department of Labor Publishes AI Framework for Hiring Practices

    by CUPA-HR | October 16, 2024

    On September 24, the Department of Labor (DOL), along with the Partnership on Employment & Accessible Technology (PEAT), published the AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework. The framework is intended to be a tool to support the inclusive use of artificial intelligence in employers’ hiring technology, specifically for job seekers with disabilities.

    According to DOL, the framework was created in support of the Biden administration’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Issued in October 2023, the executive order directed the Secretary of Labor, along with other federal agency officials, to issue guidance and regulations to address the use and deployment of AI and other technologies in several policy areas. Notably, it also directed DOL to publish principles and best practices for employers to help mitigate harmful impacts and maximize potential benefits of AI as it relates to employees’ well-being.

    The new AI Framework includes 10 focus areas that cover issues impacting the recruitment and hiring of people with disabilities and contain information on maximizing the benefit of using and managing the risks associated with assessing, acquiring and employing AI hiring technology.

    The 10 focus areas are:

    1. Identify Employment and Accessibility Legal Requirements
    2. Establish Roles, Responsibilities and Training
    3. Inventory and Classify the Technology
    4. Work with Responsible AI Vendors
    5. Assess Possible Positive and Negative Impacts
    6. Provide Accommodations
    7. Use Explainable AI and Provide Notices
    8. Ensure Effective Human Oversight
    9. Manage Incidents and Appeals
    10. Monitor Regularly

    Under each focus area, DOL and PEAT provide key practices and considerations for employers to implement as they work through the AI framework. It is important to note, however, that the framework does not have force of law and that employers do not need to implement every practice or goal for every focus area at once. The goal of the framework is to lead employers to inclusive practices involving AI technology over time.

    DOL encourages HR personnel — along with hiring managers, DEIA practitioners, and others — to familiarize themselves with the framework. CUPA-HR will keep members apprised of any future updates relating to the use of AI in hiring practices and technology.



    Source link

  • Creating Durability with the Modern Learner Part 2

    Creating Durability with the Modern Learner Part 2

    In this episode of the EdUp Experience Podcast, we continue to dive deep into the world of the Modern Learner with host Dr. Joe Sallustio and his guest Sarah Russell, Vice President of Marketing, Dr. Chris Gilmore, Vice President of Enrollment Management and Katie Tomlinson, Senior Director of Analytics & Business Intelligence. Together, they challenge traditional thinking about higher education and explore how institutions can adapt to meet the unique needs of today’s diverse student population. You’ll hear insightful discussions about changing student behavior, the importance of accessibility, and the need for innovative program development. Listen to the podcast below or read the transcript.

    Transcript

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Welcome back everybody. It’s your time to “EdUp” on the EdUp Experience Podcast where we make education your business. This is episode two of a special miniseries titled “Education Elevated: Navigating the Future of Online Higher Education,” brought to you by the EdUp experience and our amazing partner EducationDynamics, who’s going to supply all of the brainpower today. I don’t actually have to do anything because they’ve got all the answers to your most pressing questions about today’s Modern Learner. So this series is really important because we’re going to explore the evolution, really the landscape of higher education as experienced by today’s diverse and interconnected student population. And I think what it comes down to is students today, however you define that, and I think it is important to define that student– an 18 year old, 88-year-old, somewhere in between, transfer credit, no transfer credit, first time full-time, freshmen, adult student, right?

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    There’s so much definition that goes around the word student, and I think we fail in higher ed a lot of times to say exactly who we’re talking about. So this concept of the Modern Learner really has been something, and I’ve been championing here on the podcast and I got it from EducationDynamics. They came up with it and I was like, “Ooh, that’s good. I think I’ll steal that a little bit, but also give credit where it’s due.” And I always tag the group and I tag ’em and I give the call out. But the Modern Learner really speaks to, I think today’s student with evolved behaviors, the way they look at things, the way they make decisions. And so EducationDynamics has brought us a panel of experts today, a panel of the most knowledgeable people in enrollment and marketing that you can find anywhere. And I know this because I know them and I’ve talked to them before, and the insights that you can get from them are going to be incredible and let’s get them here on the mic one at a time. Ladies and gentlemen, first off, she’s Sarah Russell. She’s the Vice President of Marketing with EducationDynamics. How are you, Sarah?

    Sarah Russell:

    I’m doing great. How are you?

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Back again, right? I think this is the 2nd or third time you’ve been on with me.

    Sarah Russell:

    At least the second that I can remember,

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    But really important now as we talk about the Modern Learner, and we’re going to get to it because marketing obviously is a huge part of how you got to get to these folks first and their behaviors are a little bit different, and then you’ve got to figure out how to enroll them. Also, we’ve got Chris Gilmore with us today. He’s the Vice President of Enrollment Marketing with EducationDynamics. Chris, welcome back. How are you?

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Yeah, I’m great, Joe. Thanks for having me.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    And then you know what, Chris, once you find the Modern Learner and you figure out how to speak to them and you get them enrolled, which is not easy, right? It takes a specific amount of knowledge and it’s not the same as enrolling what we would call a traditional student. It’s a completely different, you got to track and you got to have analytics and you got to data. And so we brought a data expert. She’s Katie Tomlinson, she’s director of Analytics with EducationDynamics. Katie, welcome back. How are you?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    Great. Thank you for having us join.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    So you guys are all back. We’re going to talk about the Modern Learner. This is so important and it’s really an honor for us to partner with EducationDynamics as we talk about the Modern Learner. And Katie, I want to start with you. Who is the Modern Learner? Seems like we need some definition around who the Modern Learner is. So let’s start there and any kind of stats or demographics, of course, you’re the Director of Analytics, so I have to ask you to bring the meat and potatoes, so to speak, any data you have around how you define the Modern Learner.

    Katie Tomlinson:

    Thanks, Joe. So the Modern Learner can really be anyone. We’re talking about working adults, we’re talking about parents, veterans, lifelong learners who are juggling those multiple responsibilities while still pursuing their education. The Modern Learner also includes our younger recent high school graduates. So those on that path between high school to college graduation. And what we’re seeing is that the lines are really being blurred between what we used to define as adults and traditional students as both their educational and their student preferences are evolving. And we need to rethink our assumptions about who these students are based on both their age or their background. My point here is that age really no longer predicts modality or pathway, which makes it extremely important as you move forward that your brand and your messaging strategy and your approach needs to be unified across your entire organization. We should not be parsing out different strategies based on perspective students age or their modality anymore.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    So we think kind of in a binary way in higher education, we say there’s traditional students who go to when we think that, or you talk to somebody who lives outside of higher education who has kids that attend an institution and you say higher education to them. They think red brick buildings, students walking on campus with a backpack, right? Traditional students. That’s what I think so many people envision. And then everybody else who’s the non-traditional student, the adult student, maybe the student who’s working, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. What I hear you saying is the Modern Learner isn’t the modality, it’s not the way in which you journey through your educational pursuits. It’s characteristic based rather than modality based, right?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    That’s correct. Yeah. I mean, even if you think about the number of higher education students participating in online starting in 2019, that number was 33%. We’re now at that staggering 66%. So if you are thinking about describing that Modern Learner and those attributes, we really need to think about them having some of those same motivations and behaviors that we used to coin with that traditional online college student.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    That’s so good. And Chris and Sarah, I’m bringing you both in here. This is, I say I’m going to ask certain questions and then I actually get on here and I go, “I’m going to take a detour.” I have talked to over 300 college presidents. More than that, probably 320 that with what we have in the can. One of the most, I want to say it’s common, but it comes up is okay, there’s some traditional campuses, and when I say traditional, they’re on a traditional academic calendar, fall, spring, little bit of summer, fall, spring, little bit of summer, kind of like that. And you go, okay, how are you going to differentiate? What are you going to do in the future? How are you going to sustain your enrollment? Well, we’re going to bring in an adult student. We’re going to go after a Modern Learner. We’re going to bring in this different type of student than we’ve ever been used to before, and we’re going to do it.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    We’re just going to say, we’re going to go after this student and we’re going to bring them in on our traditional academic calendar with our classes that aren’t designed typically for adult learners or for the modern student. And I think that maybe there’s this expectation that just because you’re offering something online, magic happens and people start showing up in your classes, but it’s totally different infrastructure, thought processes, messaging, enrollment. Can you guys weigh in a little bit on some of the differences? I mean, you can’t just do it, right? You can’t just go, “We’re going to go after some college know credential population” and the magic takes place.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Maybe Sarah, you can start speaking to how we attract them in the first place, because even starting at that is a different game. And then I can talk a little bit to once we actually have them in the funnel.

    Sarah Russell:

    Yes, absolutely. So from a marketing standpoint, it’s really important that you understand the media habits and usage of this population and where you can reach them and at what stage of their decision journey they are typically in when they’re interacting with certain points of media. So generally, if you’re going to want to get in that consideration stage, you need to do it early because once they narrow their set of prospective colleges down to two or three, if you’re not in that grouping, you’re already too late. And if you’re focusing really heavily on the bottom of the marketing funnel with a lot of lead gen, but you haven’t gotten in that consideration list yet, you’re really wasting your dollars there. So making sure that you are allocating enough of your budget to inform that upper funnel awareness and consideration, and that’s going to allow you to really heavily play in connected TV, a lot of the reels and short form video in social, et cetera.

    Sarah Russell:

    And you should really have a strong messaging pipeline for how are you speaking to those students at the top of the funnel, How are you speaking to them throughout the funnel and how does their mindset change and what becomes important to them. Going back to school is a very big decision, no matter the student population. So whether that is a first time freshman going to school for the first time or an adult student who may be returning to school or finishing a degree, you really have to make sure that you are addressing their pain points with marketing because today’s Modern Learner is a very well-informed and highly researched student. So they’re going to want a lot of that information on the front end before they even consider your school as being in their prospect list. So really understanding those media channels, the messaging that’s going to resonate throughout. So then once they get to the point of raising their hand, requesting information, interacting with your institution, they’re a lot more informed than maybe they were 2, 3, 5 years ago,

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Chris. Okay. So you’ve done all of this different that Sarah made it sound relatively easy –it is not– everything she said is super hard. You have to have a completely different infrastructure thought process. Even your technology has to be upgraded in different. So let’s just say you’re skilled enough to do some of the things that Sarah says in terms of marketing, which many schools are not.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Yeah, absolutely right. I mean, I agree with everything that Sarah said in terms of how we’re attracting them, how we’re engaging them, how we’re getting them into the funnel, and then a different workflow starts and that’s how we’re communicating with them. As Sarah said, we need to be making sure that we are in the channels that they’re in. That applies also once we get them into the funnel. So really flexible contact strategies are really important. With the Modern Learner, we can’t tell them how to communicate with us. We should be so lucky that they are choosing to engage in communicating with us. So we have to really be present wherever the student is comfortable engaging. So text messaging, email, phone call, if that works for them, but being present in multiple channels during the initial contact strategy. And then once you engage the student, it is a little bit of a different flavor to the conversation.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Both Katie and Sarah laid out that these students are primarily motivated by outcomes, career opportunities, job growth, compensation and salary potential. So to Sarah’s point, they’re doing a lot of research before they even enter that funnel. And when they do get to the funnel and they connect with your enrollment professionals, your enrollment counselors, your coaches, they’re likely to come with very specific questions. And those are likely to be amongst others, very outcome-based. So your team needs to be able highlight the value propositions of the programs, which means that your programs need to be aligned with a good outcomes-based value proposition because if it’s not, they’re not going to be attracted to it in the first place. If it is and we cannot articulate it, well then same thing, it gets a little blurry and not mid funnel. So I think being present in the channels that they’re willing to engage with you on, and then once we do get them engaged, being able to speak specifically to the needs of this population, understanding that it’s a little bit different than your straight out of high school population.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Do you think, Chris, that students, the Modern Learner is patient, are they willing to wait? And I ask this, let me give you the context. I’m on a fall spring calendar, right? My term is August. In January, I enroll a student in November or October and I say, “Hey, look, you missed fall. You got to wait till January or February.” Are they waiting around? Is brand so strong that they’re waiting around or are they going, you know what, “I’m ready when I’m ready and I’m going to find a school that’s ready for me.”

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    It is a big risk. You’re taking some might and it depends on the availability of the program and what really drew them to them, but more than likely they have alternative options to complete it and they’re going to find a way to get in faster. And to Sarah’s point, again, a lot of these students are doing research before they engage. A lot of this decision making is a little further on than we’re used to historically. So by the time they’re speaking with you, by the time you’re advising them on the application process, they’re ready to roll. And so we as institutions want to capitalize on that, but they primarily as students, they are ready for this step by the time they take that. So when you get them through that application process and then you tell them, “Hey, term starts in 12 weeks,” it’s not good. If they can find a way to start it in two weeks, they’re probably going to be motivated to do that.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Sarah, you back that up from your perspective and what you’ve seen that students are, I find the Modern Learner to be pretty impatient and rightfully so. It could be that they have tuition reimbursement or something and they go, I want to start right now. And you think about a student who comes back. A lot of these, some college degree students or no credential students, they’ve literally gone through the mental thought process of I want to go back. And then somebody says, well, you can’t start right now. Right? Then it’s done. It’s like the psychological contract that I was about to have with you is broken. And so it’s like Amazon telling you that your item is on back order for three weeks. You either order it something else or you go somewhere else to order it.

    Sarah Russell:

    Yes, I think that’s absolutely accurate and really bears out that concept of they’re doing a lot of that research. They’ve already decided they’re already bought in, and so the job now becomes less about I need to convince them that this is a good idea and more I need to show them the path for how it’s going to work for them. And if that path is longer than they had in mind, then you certainly run the risk of losing them to another institution that does have that schedule that fits more in their life. Like Chris said, there’s a lot of factors and we know that cost will always be probably the most significant factor, but that flexibility, that schedule, that timing is certainly a significant factor as well. And I think all of that goes into the mental math that prospective students, the Modern Learner today is really doing when they’re deciding to go back to school and where to do that.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Katie, I won’t come back to you for this, but then open it up to all of you, and I think a skeptic is sitting on this, is going to be listening to this at some point going, “You’re just talking about adult students.” What distinguishes the Modern Learner from this is an adult student conversation? And I know it’s not, I know, but somebody who’s listening to this might just go, you’ve relabeled what an adult student is. That’s not all the way, is it in what kind of data or analytics do we have or do you have where you went, “Oh, look at this. This is different than we’ve ever seen before and so now we’ve got to have a new category of the way we think about things”?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    Right? Well really to that point, Joe, we’re finding that the education and education process is really an ageless journey. We are seeing this age range continue to decrease. We are seeing that not what we used to label as this traditional adult student is the definition of who the Modern Learner is and ultimately, no matter what student they are, be it what we would’ve traditionally defined as an adult learner or what we’re labeling now as this Modern Learner, they all have the same goals, they all have the same needs, they all consume the same types of media, and it ultimately comes down to how we are engaging with those prospective students and from a timing perspective, how quickly they’re looking to make those decisions. To your point earlier, and I didn’t get a chance to jump in when Sarah and Chris were talking, still many of these students, 80% of them are enrolling at the school that admits them first and 54% of them want to start within one month. So it doesn’t matter. And to your point, I think having those multiple entry points throughout the school year, they want to be able to make those decisions quickly once they have really locked in and said, Hey, I want to pursue my education. And so we’ve got to capitalize on that throughout all the stages of the funnel and working with our enrollment management team to make sure we’re pushing them through very quickly as well.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Okay, let me stop there and Sarah and Chris jumping on this, but 80% of these students go to the school that admits them first.

    Katie Tomlinson:

    That’s correct.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    So somebody’s listening to this going, yeah, we’re working with the Modern Learner, and then the question is, do you think that you’re the one that admits them first? And if the answer is no, you’re probably not going to get them. I mean just that you think about that and it’s literally mind blowing. I would never have thought it was that high, right? So it’s way higher than I thought. And then you said 54% of the students, this goes back to the other point, 54% of those students want to start within one month. That makes sense to me because like I’m ready to go, I want to start now, and if you don’t have it, I’m going elsewhere. So you see these evolved behaviors and maybe speed plays a big part in this because we expect immediacy in all other parts of our life that we expect it now in higher ed too. Chris, Sarah, Katie, you can just take it where it goes.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    I think that the first thing that raises for me is in talking with universities and colleges about your internal workflow for your application decision process, some are fairly streamlined and they’re aligned with prospective students. Others, especially super specific concentrations may involve faculty review, things like that. And it’s just worth looking at and taking that stat and comparing it to our internal workflow if we have a 30 day application decision process. Not saying that that might not work in some scenarios, but it’s pretty risky with this population because what it does for them is they’re still in the decision making process. So for that 30 days, they’re now open to alternative options and they may even be seeking out alternative options, and we really don’t want that If we’re aligned with them on program and value proposition, we want to be able to close that message out to them very quickly so we can engage them and lock them in close out the shopping process.

    Sarah Russell:

    And I’d love to really jump in on that comment you made, Joe, about what makes the Modern Learner different from an adult student or an adult learner. And one of the things that I think is really important for why we need to start talking about this Modern Learner is that a huge mistake I think I’ve seen a lot of institutions make as they’ve tried to expand into this population is coming up with an entirely different brand story almost for how that institution serves their adults and non-traditional students relative to how they’ve been talking to and positioning themselves with a more traditional student. And I think the Modern Learner concept is really important in that it starts identify where there’s not as much of a clear delineation anymore between what type of student or type of person fits into a traditional student versus a non-traditional post-traditional adult student.

    Sarah Russell:

    There’s starting to be a lot more crossover and those lines are blurring a little bit. And so if to your point Joe, a lot of institutions realize that there is so much different infrastructure and process that’s necessary for that population versus maybe where they’ve traditionally enrolled that on campus residential student. But to take that concept and carry that over into how you as an institution are messaging yourself I think is very dangerous because from a prospective student population, you are one institution and it’s important that you are bringing forward the value props that are most resonant to an 18-year-old first time freshman versus to an adult student. However, the Modern Learner concept really I think necessitates that you have to have a unified brand story across those different audiences and understanding that student population and where there are hard lines and where there are not between how we’ve traditionally talked about first time freshmen versus adult students, but really starting to encompass this idea of a Modern Learner is going to really have characteristics of both and how do we make sure that we haven’t drawn these really unnecessary lines in between how we’re talking to those students and how we’re talking about ourselves as institutions.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Now I know you guys all do amazing work as an institution– EducationDynamics — I’m talking about, is an organization, an institution comes to you and says, we really want to access the Modern Learner population. We want more of these students to come to our institution. We have some marketing money, you’re going to help us spend it and maximize it, and you’re going to generate leads for us and students who are interested in our programs and then we’re going to take those, that student interest and we’re going to enroll these students. And as easy as that sounds, it’s not that easy. And I bet there’s some frustration on the EducationDynamics side where it’s like, okay, did that lead even get in the system? We generated it, you gave us money, we generated, we helped you generate this interest and did it make it into your system?

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Are you measuring it? Do you know if the student enrolled or how long it took ’em to enroll? Did they come with transfer credit? How long did it take to get the transfer credit evaluated? That could be the reason the student just took off because it took you three weeks to evaluate the transfer credit. So what advice do you have to institutions who are really trying to access the modern learning? What are the things we should be looking at before we can really jump into the water and go after and recruit these students? Chris, why don’t you start?

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    So for me, I would start with the product as the first point. Both Katie and Sarah have made the good point a few times that these are very outcomes-based students, they are attracted to growing career fields. They want close to assurances that they’re going to be in a high employment scenario come graduation. And so for me, the very first thing that I would do is take a look at the product that I’m trying to engage them with the programs, are they aligned with those types of outcomes? Because if they’re not, you’re taking already difficult work and making it nearly impossible. So that’s where I would start from there.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    So you’re saying don’t give me a lemon program, I am at EducationDynamics, don’t give me a lemon and tell me to market it because it’s going to be a lemon.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Don’t give me a lemon. But in general, I’m not of the position. There are a ton of lemons in the field, but there are a lot of programs that do not appropriately articulate their outcomes-based value propositions, and if we can’t message it internally as a university, we’re certainly not going to be able to engage students that this is something that will help you get there.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Yeah, that’s a good one. Katie, what do you think anything that an institution needs to really consider?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    I mean from my perspective, Joe, it always comes down to the data, right? You need to be able to measure everything and have as much information without creating barriers to prospective students, filling out lead forms and those types of things to have information about your students. So even if you have some basic information you’re collecting on your RFI, are there opportunities to append additional variables to understand more about your existing population? To your point, I think you mentioned measuring different event dates throughout the lifecycle as well. So are we capturing when a student moves from an inquiry to an application or an application to an enroll, do we understand how many days that is taking? Can we understand maybe some of the different drivers, a media mix and what that looks like and the conversion rates between those different things? But if you do not have good data across your entire ecosystem, be that within your marketing efforts and your enrollment efforts, you’re never really going to be able to fully capitalize on your marketing engine and what you’re trying to accomplish.

    Katie Tomlinson:

    So the more data you can bring, the more you can append to what you have, and the more you can understand about those students and perspective students, the more armed you will be to be able to create different messaging strategies to have different marketing strategies even in your admissions process, understanding how different perspective students want to be engaged with and contacted with. Maybe that’s based on program, maybe that’s based on their age, maybe that’s based on the life cycle or stage that they’re at in their life, but if you have all of that, that’s the gold really, and what you can do with that is really limitless.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Sarah, what advice, what do institutions need to consider?

    Sarah Russell:

    I would certainly piggyback on everything Katie said because within marketing it is becoming so tech enabled that you have to have that data infrastructure and you have to know how to feed that data into your marketing platforms because all of the bidding, all of the optimization is really happening behind the scenes using AI, using these tech enabled tools, and you have to make sure that you are giving the algorithms the correct data and the most valuable data to be able to make those decisions around how much should you be paying for this spot, for this click, for this impression in that moment for that particular audience. It’s a very different game today than it was a few years ago when all of that was kind of being manually decided by your media strategists and now it’s more you are using your skills to inform all of these tech enabled tools and AI powered tools. So making sure that not only are you doing that correctly, but you’re building that data infrastructure in order to power that is so important from a marketing standpoint.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Yeah, you said AI, it’s like bing, bing, bing, everybody’s ears perk up. But if you think about the Modern Learner, even just the way Google is operating right now, if you do a search, you’re going to get a AI output that’s going to explain to you the school that you’re looking at or the type of program that you’re looking for and who might have it. So how the decision making process is being made is changing daily, minute by minute, Sarah, and you just go, how do we understand what’s happening?

    Sarah Russell:

    As an institution, you absolutely need to partner with the people, the companies, the teams that can help you navigate through that because it is so dynamic and like you said, Joe, it’s probably changing right now while we’re on this podcast. One thing that I see as being very much in flux right now is how prospective students and the Modern Learner are seeking information. Because you’re right, we’re seeing a lot more of that AI overview if they’re seeking an answer, it happens right there in the search results. There’s less of a drive I think to click through and navigate websites in that environment. So how do we think about website optimization and SEO differently than we did prior to that kind of experience? You also see a huge amount of especially younger students using social media platforms as search engines rather than going to Google. And so how they’re seeking out information, how they’re valuing this information, it certainly is continuing to change and I do not think it is feasible for an institution to navigate that completely alone. You have to partner with agencies, Google, Facebook, you have to understand all of those changes and how they are going to influence you.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    I think about this a lot. I interview so many people and then I get on my soapboxing thing and I’m kind of laughing to myself because I repeat these things a lot and I want to say ’em again and Chris, I’m going to come to you on it because so many of them are enrollment focused, but when you start to think about what an institution has to consider, yes, the marketing, yes, the messaging, yes, the branding, where the interest goes, can you log it, can you get it? And then your actual tactical and policy infrastructure takes over. It’s like take a Modern Learner and stick ’em into your policy structure and everything breaks. It could be your admissions requirements, it could be the transfer credit evaluation process. It could be how you admit the student. Maybe if it was a traditional student that had to go speak to a dean somewhere and write letters of recommendation and now you’ve got a Modern Learner who’s like, I am not going to do that stuff.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    I am literally I’m working somewhere. I’ve got a good job. I’m not going to spend my time writing letters of recommendation. I’m going to go somewhere where you make it easy for me to enroll and you respect my background and almost I’ve seen students take it almost offensively like I got to go do all this stuff that a kid would have to do if I’m older. And so you start to see this policy structure break. Then to your point is the product, can I just take the product I have it expect a Modern Learner to go through it, or do I need to look at alternative academic schedules that are non-standard term with different financial aid modeling, with leave of absence policies that allow me to go in and out and in and out because I may not be continuous forever because of my job and it’s like, do we really consider these even eight to five, like the eight to five, you really truly have no idea what you’re doing with a modern student. If everybody just works eight to five, if everybody’s working eight to five, you’re really not available to serve a Modern Learner who might want to call you at eight o’clock at night. Who the heck is working in multiple time zones? If a Modern Learner is coming from Central’s time to Pacific time, do you have somebody that’s even available to talk to a student when that student gets home from work or whatever? I know I’m ranting, but all of these become problems.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    It’s rant worthy. Yeah, it’s rant worthy. It’s tough, and I think we talk about it quite a bit with our university partners and the first piece of advice is to review your internal workflows and that includes your policies and procedures from application to initial registration and continuing student experience. The Modern Learner is used to clicking and receiving, clicking and receiving.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    I like that.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Our internal policies and procedures often are really clunky and so they’re worth a review and I am not of the mindset of we need to wipe the slate with all academic policies and there are reasons and scenarios for certain programs to require letters of recommendation and everything like that, but there is a lot of fluff in there oftentimes, and those are the things that we need to look through. We need to ask, what value is this serving today? What risk does it put into our enrollment funnel? And we need to kind of balance those out and where the risk is greater than the value. I recommend reviewing that and maybe removing that and where it is substantial and it’s worth keeping in place, we just need to make sure that we’re clearly articulating the why of that process to the student. Students will get it.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    You are right. They’re not patient people. I am not. We are not. But if we understand the why behind it, which means that in our messaging on the application process when they’re on the app page, it’s very clear, very easy to understand when they’re asking our staff, they also understand how to describe it and then that those processes are easy to do. They’re not administratively clunky, and that’s really what we look at. With that. You also raise another thing that I wanted to touch on, which is these students are not typically available in traditional work hours all the time. Some are, some aren’t. But even if they are, they may not want to communicate with you in the way that historically institutions are used to pushing out communications like get on the phone with me for 45 minutes. Sometimes that works, sometimes that doesn’t. But to Sarah’s point, we have so many new tools that to me, it used to be a huge challenge if I couldn’t invest in a workforce that’s going to be available up until 8:30 PM on the evenings and most time zones. Now, yes, that’s ideal if you can have a portion there. If you can’t, let’s talk about some of the new tools, generative AI chat, making a really high quality generative chat experience that may not totally take the place of personalized coaching, but there’s a time and a place for it. And if a student wants to engage and they have a question at 9:00 PM at night, I certainly would rather have an option to engage with them than to let them know I will reach out to them at 8:30 the next day.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    I think, Katie, about a LeBron James a lot when we’re talking about the modern student. I know it doesn’t make sense the way I say it like that, but when he went to Miami, he says, “I’m bringing my talents to Miami.” And I think about a student doing that. It’s like this era of higher education post Covid post now AI, I don’t want to say not post AI, but as the variables have changed, the student is dictating more of how the university operates rather than the university dictating how the student needs to operate. So it’s like the driver’s seat is now the student’s in more control and I mentioned ins and outs and the student kind of coming in and coming out. Maybe they’re taking non-credit courses, credentials, and you’re nodding your head, you’re just like, yes, yes, yes. And I just go, what resonates with you on the in and out of a Modern Learner and the way that they’re choosing?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    I mean, I think the biggest thing that we have seen over the last few years is just the demand for certificates both on the grad and undergrad side and thinking about the fact that based on 2023 completions, our undergrad certs were up 13% and our grad certs were up 27%. We’re continuing to see the demand for the types of programs, some of these shorter term credentials. That’s a big shift in what we had historically seen in the market, and they still represent maybe a small number of the degrees awarded overall, but this piece of the pie continues to get larger.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    And you’re right, it is and the demands are changing, and that’s the whole point of the whole Modern Learner designation is that how we’re choosing what we’re choosing, why we choose and when we choose are all up to us. And there’s multiple, it’s like choose your own adventure in higher education now it needs to be one path, right? Higher ed said you’re going to get a degree. That’s why I say that the era has changed that you’re going to get a degree or you’re not going to have a degree. Now it’s choose a pathway and you could go on an end around and end up at a degree way later in life where you could start. And there’s so many ways to achieve it institutionally. Back to Chris and Sarah, real fast enrollment and marketing synergy I would imagine here has to be like lockstep, right? I think that’s pretty common in higher ed. Still this guy where one points at the other, well, you didn’t get enough enrollment as well, you didn’t generate enough interest, and it’s that whole back and forth, and I’ve always felt one that is one unit and should be under one person, not in every institution. Can you just talk about synergy and why that’s going to be important here as we try to recruit a Modern Learner?

    Sarah Russell:

    Yeah, absolutely. I’ll get started and then Chris, I’m sure you’ll have something to add as well. It’s absolutely imperative to have that really synced up understanding of what is driving our performance, how can we tie that back to our marketing results and really have that continual pivot of this is the student sentiment, here’s what we’re hearing when we get on the phone with these prospects or this isn’t working at all and the leads that we’re getting here don’t even align with what we’re looking for. So that I think is really basic that fundamentally needs to be in place. But as we’re thinking about the Modern Learner and how the landscape is changing, I also think it becomes so important to have a third component of that duality. Now it becomes maybe a hierarchy. You have to have your data aligned in a much more impactful way because when you’re investing in some of the awareness generating mediums and you’re investing in your website, you’re not going to have as much of that one-to-one, I placed X number of media dollars in this campaign and it generated X number of inquiries and they converted at X rate and now I have this many students.

    Sarah Russell:

    It is rarely going to be that linear, and I think we’re going to see that become more and more non-linear as we continue to unpack this era of the Modern Learner. And so having that really strong data component becomes so much more important because you have to have the understanding of your attribution a little bit. How did we invest in this area that influenced this other area and what does that look like? And having a really clear data storytelling to help influence that back and forth between enrollment and marketing is going to be so crucial because again, maybe we want it to be, maybe we’re used to it being more linear, but that’s not the reality anymore and we have to have the data literacy to understand the more non-linear journey.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Chris, go ahead.

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Agree with all of that. The only other point that I would add in there is just for all of those reasons, it historically, and a lot of times still with universities is looked at as front of funnel, mid funnel, and we really just got to get rid of that and put in good old fashioned team synergies because everything that Sarah has described absolutely critical. We also just have to make sure from a human perspective that the teams are on the same page, that they view one another as the same team, that there’s not this I report here and you report there, I have these KPIs and you have these KPIs, and I think making sure that you have a team that understands that messaging, that if you have more than one leader over marketing and enrollment, that those people are closely aligned with vision on how these things should be, that they’re in good rapport and that they’re spreading that down to their team regularly.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Sarah, what do you call it when you put in a fourth component? A “quadra-“

    Sarah Russell:

    “Quadrarchy” perhaps. I think that’s it.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    I bring that up because say, you better have financial aid in a good spot because you can do all this work. You can go after this Modern Learner, you can recruit this Modern Learner, enroll this Modern Learner, and then stick them into a antiquated, perhaps long financial aid process. And boy, don’t they want that information right now. They want to know how much it’s going to cost right now, and if you make me wait two weeks to find out what it’s going to cost, I will simply go elsewhere. There’s no chance that I’m waiting for the intro on Netflix. I hit that skip intro button every single time, and students will do the same thing when it comes to that. And financial aid is just another key component in this because you can lose students really easily through slowness, and I think the Modern Learner expects service, right?

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Yeah. I think at the start it was Katie who mentioned that they’re price sensitive and they want a low cost option that is a need that we know upfront. And I think in financial aid traditionally it used to be more like a backend function, and now it’s absolutely both. So I view front end financial advising that needs to be an add-on service to your standard enrollment support mid-funnel. The teams that are having those conversations need to be able to easily articulate not only the cost for the credential, but what the financing options are in terms of financial aid or tuition reimbursement or however that individual student is looking to pay for it. Your team better be able to easily communicate it. And then if that’s a fit for them and they actually get started in the process, you’re absolutely right. Once they complete that fafsa, once they sign that master promissory note, we can’t have 30 days before we follow up with them with what their award letter is, with what their loan eligibility is. That needs to be a faster process, and that is often a big risk on the further back end of the funnel is I completed this fafsa, even if I got this information from my enrollment advisor upfront, I’m feeling kind of gray about this. I don’t have clarity, and we don’t want anything in the gray zone at that stage in the enrollment and financial aid can often be.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    And then you add in something like, well, I understand what my costs are, but I submitted for transfer credit, but they told me it’s going to be three weeks before I actually know what I’m going to pay. Those are just major risks that we have to fix in higher ed. As we kind of come to the tail end of this episode, I feel like it’s necessary to ask this question because if you’re an institution and you do serve primarily a traditional student for the most part, or even if you’re serving some Modern Learners, you probably have a marketing organization that you’re working with that’s helping you at a traditional student level. And I have seen personally institutions try to expand those marketing agencies to serve a Modern Learner and fail because there’s a specialty vibe I think to this. But there’s also some risk, not risk that you can’t mitigate in managing multiple marketing companies serving multiple learners.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Can you guys talk about how EducationDynamics really fits with institutions? What value proposition do you provide really love on yourselves a little bit here as we come to the end of the episode, because I’ve worked with you guys, this is true life testimonial right here. I hired EducationDynamics at my last institution and they absolutely slate it for me. I mean, you guys killed it. Our enrollment for the Modern Learner was going up by 20 and 30% per term. It was insane. Nearly doubled our Modern Learner population in a very, very short period of time. And that’s truth, that’s just Joe CIO truth in working with you guys, but there is some puzzle pieces that you have put together.

    Sarah Russell:

    Yeah, I’ll absolutely start on that one because I think what where I have seen agencies potentially struggle when they’re going from a traditional student marketing and recruitment strategy to trying to get into the sphere of the Modern Learner is not necessarily understanding how the marketing channels that the Modern Learner is very fluent in should be managed and operated within the realm of higher education. Because it’s so important that you have the ability to optimize your campaigns and build your campaign structure and create your ad messaging in a way that’s going to speak to that student population. It’s certainly not a copy paste. I think that there tends to be more of a, I’ll just buy a list or I will just mail out some mailers when you’re talking about a traditional first time freshmen recruitment strategy. But there’s so much more complexity and layers in being able to bring that strategy to the Modern Learner that I think it actually works a lot better if you are maybe working with a partner on recruiting for the Modern Learner.

    Sarah Russell:

    And then how can you expand that to more of that traditional first time freshmen? Because we’re seeing those behaviors of those first time freshmen start to mimic what we’ve just been operating under as truth for Modern Learner for the last several years. So I think it works better one way than the other, and that’s where I think if you are looking to maybe centralize or consolidate any of your marketing efforts, I think it’s going to work a lot better if you take your learnings, you take your relationships that you have from marketing to a Modern Learner, a post-traditional student, and bring those to your traditional student marketing rather than vice versa.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    100%. I agree with that a hundred percent. Well, let’s close this out. I want to give everybody a last word, and Katie, I’ll end with you since we started with you. Chris, anything else you want to say about the Modern Learner that you feel is important for institutions to know?

    Dr. Chris Gilmore:

    Yeah, I just think that it is the reality now. So it’s no longer this thing that we have to plan for the future to Katie’s points in the very first minutes of this, they’re here. They’re the new normal for us. So if you’re not deeply in the work already, it’s time to start.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Sarah, same question. What else do you want to say about the Modern Learner?

    Sarah Russell:

    They are very complex and reaching them is not a straightforward endeavor in any way. So making sure that you understand and respect the complexity of developing a marketing strategy, and I think you might’ve mentioned this very early on in the episode, Joe, it sounds easier than it actually is, and making sure that if you get to the point where you’ve bitten off more than you can chew, you’re reaching out to the pros to help you.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    One thing we didn’t even get to was the whole value of higher ed and how that is making the Modern Learner like their BS meter is so on point. You need to really message because the alternative messaging coming to them is, well, you don’t need to go to school. You don’t need a degree. So when they get information in front of them, it has to be authentic and true and pointed and tactical and tell ’em exactly what they need to know, which is a whole other conversation for a podcast in a not so distant future. Katie, last word to you. What else do you want to say about the Modern Learner?

    Katie Tomlinson:

    Well, I really want you to think about education now being ageless. And again, this idea that age no longer predicts our learning modality, and I’ll give you a little teaser for the spring. So this year we’re actually going to shift our focus from our annual online college student survey, which we’ve coined our OCS survey to be more inclusive of what we’ve talked about today, which is the Modern Learner. I really can’t wait to share the new insights about this population and really provide some more definition as to how we can engage with these prospective students as we move into 2025. So we’ll be sharing those insights from our new sample at our InsightsEDU conference in February and hopefully with you and your listeners around the same time too.

    Dr. Joe Sallustio:

    Katie, I got to tell you, the report that you all put out, you’re renaming it, but this report that details what’s happening in the industry as we look at a Modern Learner and the way they make decisions is really the foundation, at least it was for me as I was working to recruit the Modern Learner, the foundation for how I was making my decisions, where I was investing my money, how I was designing my policies and my procedures around serving the student. It’s critical research. You do a great job. EducationDynamics does a great job of putting this out there, and I encourage everybody when it does come out, which I’ll know before you know… unless you attend InsightsEDU! Do you guys like that transition? InsightsEDU in New Orleans, February 12 through 14. It’ll be my birthday. Maybe you’ll get it as a birthday gift as we pass it out to the audience. But this is critical research that will help you serve a Modern Learner, and I urge you to attend InsightsEDU and to check out the report. Great work, Katie. Great work EducationDynamics. Ladies and gentlemen, you’ve just “EdUp-ped!”

    Source link

  • HR and the Courts — October 2024

    HR and the Courts — October 2024

    by CUPA-HR | October 15, 2024

    Each month, CUPA-HR General Counsel Ira Shepard provides an overview of several labor and employment law cases and regulatory actions with implications for the higher ed workplace. Here’s the latest from Ira.

    NCAA & Power Conferences Receive Preliminary Approval of Name, Image and Likeness and Anti-Trust Settlement — Ivies Win Dismissal of Anti-Trust Lawsuit

    A federal district court judge has given preliminary approval to the NCAA and Power Conferences’ revised $2.8 billion settlement proposal to be paid to college athletes over 10 years. The judge set a fairness hearing for April 2025, with all objections to be filed by January 31, 2025. The federal judge in the Northern District of California concluded that the revised settlement was “fair, reasonable and adequate” (In Re College Athlete NIL Litigation (N.D. Ca. No. 4:20-cv-03919, 10/7/24)).

    Commentators immediately voiced concerns that the settlement addresses a small group of male athletes in specific sports to the disadvantage of female athletes. In addition, a number of Division I athletes may express objection on the grounds that the settlement continues to give the NCAA too much control over the free market compensation for student-athletes.

    Separately, the eight Ivy League institutions won a dismissal of a federal lawsuit that claimed their ban on athletic scholarships violated anti-trust laws. The federal district court judge assigned to the case granted the Ivy League’s motion for summary judgement, holding that the plaintiffs failed to allege any properly defined market and therefore failed to allege market wide anti-competitive effects (Choh v. Brown University, et. al. (D. Conn. No. 3:23-cv-00305, 10/10/24)).

    University of Louisville School of Medicine Loses First Amendment Retaliation Claim Brought by Terminated Professor

    A former professor at the University of Louisville School of Medicine will receive a trial over his First Amendment retaliation claims regarding statements he made about gender dysphoria to a conservative think tank. Following comments he made during an event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation, the former medical school professor was demoted and his annual contract was not renewed. The professor expressed the view that gender dysphoria in children “is a sociocultural, psychological phenomenon that cannot be fully addressed with drugs and surgery.”

    The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the university officials who terminated Allan M. Josephson should have known that he was engaged in protected speech, and that terminating him would violate his First Amendment rights. Moreover, the court ruled that the professor’s outside speech was not part of his professorial duties, and therefore subject to his First Amendment claims. The court concluded that a trial is necessary, as there are facts in dispute regarding the rationale for the actions taken against the professor (Josephson v. Ganzel (6th Cir., No. 23-05293, 9/10/24)).

    Tenured Professor Loses Defamation Case Against Harvard

    A federal district court judge partially dismissed a noted behavioral scientist’s $25 million defamation and breach-of-contract lawsuit against Harvard University. Professor Francesca Gino was placed on administrative leave following claims of data fraud in her research. Gino claimed that the university’s notice on her faculty page that she had been placed on administrative leave after conducting an investigation of her research was libelous because the university acted with ill will.

    The court concluded that the professor was a “public figure” and therefore faces a higher standard for proving defamation. A public figure in these circumstances can only prove defamation if the alleged defamer had knowledge that their statement was untrue or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. Moreover, the court concluded that the issue of “research integrity and potential misconduct” is one of public concern, adding to the reason for the dismissal of the defamation claim (Gino v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College (D. Mass. No. 1:23-cv-11775, 9/11/24)).

    Regarding the professor’s breach-of-contract claims, the professor alleged that the university’s decision to place her on administrative leave and its related disciplinary sanctions were the same as tenure removal. The judge concluded that it is premature to rule on the breach-of-contract claims.

    Public School Employees Lose Free Speech Case Challenging Anti-Racism Training

    In a case with possible application to public higher ed training, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a case brought by two Missouri public school employees who claimed that anti-bias employee training violated their First Amendment rights. The lawsuit failed because the court concluded that they were never asked to leave nor were they disciplined for expressing contrary views and that they received professional development credit for attending the anti-racism training (Henderson v. Springfield R-12 School District (8th Cir No. 2301374, 9/12/24)).

    The decision provides some clarity on such training, as the court noted that the employees were not compelled to express certain views or refrain from expressing certain views during the training. The appellate court did reverse the trial judge’s ruling requiring the plaintiffs to pay $300,000 in attorney fees for filing a frivolous claim.

    Former Student’s Title IX Claim Dismissed as Alleged University Internship Did Not Exist

    A federal district court judge dismissed allegations of a sexually abusive internship at the University of Michigan because the plaintiff could not prove the internship actually existed. The court noted that none of the usual formalities, such as an application or a university authorization of an internship, were established.

    In light of this, the court dismissed the Title IX claims and allegations of failure to investigate sex harassment and abuse allegations as the plaintiff did not allege discrimination while “participating in or at least attempting to participate in” a university program or activity, as the internship did not exist. The University of Michigan prevailed in the case (Doe v. Baum ((2024 BL 340244 E.D. Mich. No. 4-21-cv-12492, 9/26/24)).

    University of Texas Professor Loses First Amendment Complaint

    A federal district judge dismissed a University of Texas professor’s First Amendment claim that his speech was “chilled” by unspecific threats following comments critical of “critical race theory and DEI-based ideology.” The judge dismissed the case, holding that the unspecific threats did not rise to the level of an adverse employment action (Lowery v. Mills ((W.D. Tex. No. 1:23-cv-00129, 10/2/24)).

    The judge ruled in favor of the University of Texas McCombs School of Business. The judge noted in a footnote, however, that the dismissal was not meant to approve of the university’s actions and that “in the context of a world-class university like UT, differences of opinion should be tolerated by those in authority, no matter that they are uncomfortable, so long as they do not incite violence or disrupt the school’s ability to function as a teaching institution.”

    Supreme Court to Review Split in Circuits Regarding Higher Ed ERISA Lawsuit

    The Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over the split in circuit courts of appeals as to when a university may be sued by employees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Employees of Cornell University alleged that improper service provider fees were charged to their pension fund. They are appealing an adverse 2nd Circuit decision stating employees must plead that the alleged “prohibited transaction” by the service provider involved either “unnecessary services” or the fees were “unreasonable” (Cunningham v. Cornell University (US No. 23-1007 cert granted 10/4/24)).

    The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the 3rd Circuit, the 7th Circuit, and the 10th Circuit all require the additional pleading that alleges some kind of fraud or impropriety in order to allow the case to move forward. This contrasts with the 8th Circuit and the 9th Circuit, which apply the “ERISA-as-written” rule. That rule allows a plaintiff to simply allege that a transaction between an employer and a pension or welfare plan service provider occurred and proceed with discovery over whether fraud or some other impropriety exists. We will follow developments in this case as it proceeds.



    Source link

  • SEO for Higher Education: Strategies in 2024

    SEO for Higher Education: Strategies in 2024

    Boost Your Enrollment Cycle With These Higher Ed SEO Strategies                                          

    Billions of queries occur daily through global search engines on desktop, mobile, and voice devices. These organic searches are the largest drivers of website traffic, particularly for higher education institutions, making SEO an essential ingredient in the recipe for generating student leads. A student’s journey toward enrollment is a roller coaster of considerations. From looking at financial costs and career opportunities to assessing workloads and faculty projects, students turn to search engines to answer their questions. 

    Optimizing your university’s website involves looking at a variety of SEO factors: webpage speed, page titles and headings, URL structure, link building, content, and more. Here at Archer, our higher education SEO team members have expert insight at every step on the path toward optimizing a university’s website, including technical on-page improvements, off-page link building, and, most importantly, content creation and promotion. 

    Let’s explore how your institution can stay relevant and bring new prospective students in with a sophisticated higher education SEO strategy.

    SEO for Higher Education: What You Need to Know 

    Online content saturation is at an all-time high, and competition in higher ed is intensifying. Meanwhile, the audiences that institutions are marketing to have become less traditional. 

    Capturing the attention of prospective students at a critical point in their college enrollment journey takes a deep understanding of all the nuances of search engine optimization, including search intent, click-through rates, and mobile experience. To create content that will engage online audiences, universities must have strong SEO strategies to ensure brand discovery. 

    7 SEO Strategies to Boost Your College Enrollment Cycle

    Our higher ed SEO experts have pulled together a list of seven strategies to help capture students along their path to college enrollment. Their expertise will help guide you in discerning what’s important in an SEO strategy and where to set focus for the rest of the year. 

    1. Determine Your Student Journey               

    Student journey maps are going to be key in helping you guide the focus and intent of your content. How are you making students aware of your programs? At what point are they considering your programs? Where in the journey do they make a decision, and what do they need to get there? 

    Students looking to advance their academic and professional careers are at some point in the sales funnel, but they’re also at some stage in their search engine journey. If you’re doing it right, you’ve constructed this journey carefully and provided several different routes for the different kinds of prospective students you interact with. 

    For example, a student might be only tangentially familiar with the construction industry, so you can gain their interest by crafting a piece about construction careers that graduates can enter after receiving a construction management degree. On the other hand, a student might be further along in their journey and might be at the point of more serious consideration of an engineering degree. For this student, you can craft a post about stress management for engineering students. 

    If you want to get students to your website, finding blog topics is only half the game. Using keywords to optimize your content is how you push those posts to the finish line. Google’s latest algorithms emphasize value, so figure out what value you can provide your reader at every stage of inquiry.

    By walking through the student’s college enrollment experience and differentiating content based on the needs of each stage, you can curate specific content to respond to their search intent, keep them engaged with your brand, and guide them down your content map to a post that encourages them to convert.

    2. Satisfy Student Search Intent              

    Since search intent is Google’s ultimate goal, when it comes to SEO for higher education, keyword research and content creation that match the student’s search intent should be a primary focus.

    The “How to Become a CEO” article above is a great example of a university-created piece of content that matches search intent and provides steps that show how the university program can help the searcher accomplish their goal. Content should discuss a range of topics that align with the university’s mission and program’s course curriculum while still keeping the searcher top of mind. With each piece of content, you’ll be able to attract a variety of students who are in different places in the student discovery process.

    Each of these posts should have a strong call to action (CTA) that intrigues prospective students to learn more about the university’s program and how they can become more involved and apply. This CTA can include an aesthetically pleasing “learn more” button that directs readers to a “request more information” form.

    3. Apply Google’s Helpful Content Update Learnings

    In 2023, Google introduced a new helpful content algorithm intended to help searchers find relevant results. This update is intended to weed out nonhelpful search results, defined as content that lacks experience, expertise, authoritativeness, or trustworthiness (E-E-A-T). 

    What does this mean for universities? Crafting high-quality content that meets student search intent is even more important. Instead of focusing solely on SEO keywords, university website pages and blogs need to meet Google’s quality standards in one or more E-E-A-T fields.

    Universities can meet these expectations by providing high-quality information that highlights faculty and student experiences and expertise.

    4. Elevate Your Content Strategy           

    Searchers are no longer satisfied with traditional text-based content or boring images. This is especially true for millennials and Gen Zers, who account for 42% of the U.S. population, according to Statista, and the majority of a university’s target market. 

    To capture the attention of these easily distracted searchers, higher education SEO strategies should branch out beyond traditional articles and infographics to include visually captivating and psychologically intriguing content, such as interactive graphics or videos. This refreshed content strategy should aim to not only catch a searcher’s immediate attention but also leave a lasting brand imprint to intrigue searchers to come back for more.

    Check out the following example of an engaging piece of content from Zippia.com that outlines the different career paths for cost accountants. The piece is interactive, allowing the user to move their mouse along the different career paths to reveal more detailed and relevant information.

    This interactive map is fun and easy to use while still providing the quality and quantity of content the user is looking for. It illustrates the kind of memorable yet useful experience required to capture a student’s attention.

    5. Occupy Google Search Results

    Occupying more real estate on ever-evolving search engine results pages (SERPs) is more crucial than ever. A large number of Google searches do not result in a click. With the advent of more featured snippets, the importance of a technically sound website, structured data, and high-quality content grows.

    While on-page SEO is still crucial for ranking on the SERP, off-page efforts and creating a user experience (UX) that expands past your website are the next wave of occupying internet real estate. Off-page citations, or references to your institution on websites such as U.S. News and Wikipedia, will push hints and signals to Google that validate your brand. Quality higher education SEO strategies should also include a UX that helps your site stand out in today’s saturated marketplace.

    6. Optimize Your Website for Mobile           

    To enhance the college enrollment funnel experience, you need to maintain the health of your website for both desktop and mobile.

    Since a majority of search engine visits come from mobile devices, there’s no question that higher education SEO teams should be focusing on the mobile user experience of their websites. Now that Google has mobile-first indexing best practices, your team has new factors to consider. If your website’s content differs between desktop and mobile, for example, then your site is at risk of having pages not indexed or crawled, which could result in a significant loss of traffic. 

    For starters, ensure that desktop and mobile versions of your website have identical content, as well as identical technical elements, such as structured data and meta tags. Whether you’re developing content or updating your website design, always be sure to consider both platforms in any updates you make.

    7. Understand Your Competition   

    With Google ads for search terms like “online mba” generating a high cost per click (CPC), higher education is one of the most competitive segments of search engine rankings. Why? Simply put, graduate degree programs are expensive and have large marketing budgets. In addition, affiliate marketing is rampant in the higher education space. What’s affiliate marketing? Affiliate marketers in higher education essentially sell student leads to universities.

    These affiliate sites often have large SEO budgets and benefit from degree ranking and badging tactics. Take a look at the density of non-edu sites in the search results by Googling “online mba.” 

    In addition to competing with a number of affiliate websites, traditional schools have to compete with for-profit institutions and institutions with powerful national and regional brands.

    Despite the competitive market, a long-term higher education SEO strategy, with a nuanced understanding of the market, can yield tremendous results around student enrollments and thought leadership.

    SEO for Higher Education: Boost Your Results with Archer 

    Here at Archer Education, we partner with accredited universities to help higher-ed leaders and marketers accelerate online learning growth and enrollment. We offer a variety of tech-enabled marketing, enrollment, and retention services, and our team of SEO experts is always up to date on strategies to help your program gain visibility in prospective students’ search results. 

    Our SEO tactics can help your university:

    Contact us or visit our SEO tactics page to learn more about how Archer can help you reach your enrollment goals.

    Sources

    Backlinko, Search Intent and SEO: A Complete Guide 

    Forbes, “Understanding Google’s Mobile-First Indexing To Generate More Traffic To Your Website” 

    National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Current Term Enrollment Estimates

     Statista, U.S. population Share by Generation 2023

    Zippia, How To Become A Cost Accountant: What It Is and Career Path

    Source link