Category: Featured

  • Return to Learn Day 2024 – by Sharon Connor – ALL @ Liverpool Blog

    Return to Learn Day 2024 – by Sharon Connor – ALL @ Liverpool Blog

    Storm Lillian might have been causing chaos across the North West, but nothing could dampen the spirits of everyone involved in this year’s Return to Learn Day. For the second year running, the team at Go Higher invited potential mature learners to experience a full day of talks and tours on campus.

    The day was (high) kicked off on a musical note, with Dr Freya Jarman (below left) leading listeners through the history of the multiple meanings of singing high notes in Western music. Covering everything from Tiny Tim to Barbara Streisand, our visitors quickly warmed to the topic and were keen to share their own insights and experiences. We hardly had time to pause for breath, before Heather Johnston from Sydney Jones Library delivered an informative talk on KnowHow, the University of Liverpool’s skills support service. Go Higher and KnowHow work closely together all year round; we know that many mature students may not have written anything vaguely academic for many years, and may never have used a referencing system – the Study Skills team at Go Higher are there to support your learning throughout the whole course, and KnowHow provide the university wide support for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

    Lunch provided an enjoyable opportunity for guests to chat informally with not only professional services and teaching staff, but also current and former Go Higher students. Peer support plays a major role in the success of Go Higher, not only within a year group, but more widely as a mentoring system for students to continue that contact even after they have started their undergraduate studies.

    The University of Liverpool is the only university in England with an Irish Studies Department, and Dr Sean Haughey outlined the degree course content, as well as reminding us of just how many Go Higher students decide to study with this close and supportive department. Sean also gave us a taste of the sort of lecture students might expect, asking just how divided society is now in Northern Ireland. Combining contemporary cultural references such as Derry Girls, with recent government polls on schooling opportunities, Sean suggested that social attitudes towards mixed communities are far more positive than are often put forward by politicians and the press.

    Thankfully rain had stopped by mid afternoon, and although it was still too wet to take the campus tour, attendees were welcomed for a guided tour at the iconic Victoria Gallery and Museum in Ashton Street. https://vgm.liverpool.ac.uk/  Our on campus bookstore, Blackwells, kindly offered attendees a discount for any purchases made on the day.

    The afternoon was completed by a lecture from Go Higher’s sociology lecturer, Dr David Ellis (left), who discussed his research in a talk titled ‘Towards a Sociology of Debt: Cultural Change in Britain and Beyond’. David explored the deregulation of banking by the Conservative Party in the 1980s, and the impact that it is still having today. A major point of discussion was what constituted ‘credit’ and how it differed from ‘debt’. There were so many comments and questions following this that we reached the end of the day before we knew it.

    Just in time for visitors to leave, the sun came out – but we hope to see many of them return as students in September.

    White Rabbit image by John Tenniel, from the Project Gutenberg edition of Alice In Wonderland (public domain).

     

    Source link

  • for Generative AI Integration into Education – Sovorel

    for Generative AI Integration into Education – Sovorel

    I’m very happy and excited to share that I have released a new book that is geared specifically to helping universities, as well as all educational institutions, with the very important topic of generative AI integration into education. This is a vital process that higher education and all places of learning need to address in order to become and stay relevant in a world that so filled with AI. All of us in academia must develop AI Literacy skills in order to fully develop these skills within our students. If educational institutions do not integrate this important process now, then they will not be properly setting up their students for success. This book specifically provides an action plan to help educational institutions be part of the solution and to better ensure success.

    Here is a video trailer for the 9 Point Action Plan: for Generative AI Integration into Education book:

    Table of contents for the 9 Point Action Plan: for Generative AI Integration into Education book that is now available as an ebook or printed book at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Point-Action-Plan-Generative-Integration/dp/B0D172TMMB

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    1. Chapter 1: Institutional Policies
      • Examples
      • Policy Examples
      • Implementation
    2. Chapter 2: Leadership Guidance on Utilization of Generative AI
      • Examples
      • Michigan State University Example
      • Yale University Example
      • Template Example: Leadership Guidance on Generative AI in Education
      • Implementation
    3. Chapter 3: Training
      • Faculty Training
      • Staff Training
      • Student Training
      • Examples
      • American University of Armenia Example
      • Arizona State University Example
      • Other Examples
      • Implementation
    4. Chapter 4: Generative AI Teaching & Learning Resources
      • Examples
      • University of Arizona
      • American University of Armenia
      • The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)
      • Implementation
    5. Chapter 5: Outside Information/Confirmation
      • Bring in an Outside Speaker, Presenter, Facilitator
      • Examples
      • Obtain Employers’/Organizations’ Views & Ideas on Needed AI Skills
      • Implementation
    6. Chapter 6: Syllabus AI Use Statement
      • Examples
      • Tuffs University Example
      • Vanderbilt College of Arts and Science
      • American University of Armenia Example
      • Implementation
    7. Chapter 7: Strategic Plan Integration
      • Components of a Good Strategic Plan and AI Considerations
      • Environmental Analysis
      • Review of Organizational Vision/Mission
      • Identification of Strategic Goals and Objectives
      • Key Performance Indicators
      • Integration of AI Literacy into the Curriculum
      • Example: White Paper: Integration of AI Literacy into Our Curriculum
    8. Chapter 8: Integration Observation and Evaluation
    9. Chapter 9: Community Outreach
      • Example Benefits of Community Outreach
      • Implementation
    10. Chapter 10: Conclusion and Call to Action
    11. Glossary
    12. References
    13. Additional Resources

    As with all of my books, please reach out if you have any questions. I can be found on LinkedIn and Twitter. I also respond to all comments placed this blog or through YouTube. Please also join the Sovorel Center for Teaching and Learning Facebook page where I post a lot of updates.

    Source link

  • Achieving work-life balance (or is that even possible?) – Teaching in Higher Ed

    Achieving work-life balance (or is that even possible?) – Teaching in Higher Ed

    A friend and colleague asked me about how to achieve work-life balance and what tools are best for doing that. Let’s just say I got a bit energized by her question that I recorded a video for her and sent her some key points from what I shared. If you’re wondering about these same questions, check out the comments for a link to the video I sent to her, which is now on my YouTube channel.

    RESPONSE

    I appreciate you reaching out with your concerns about achieving a more effective work-life balance and integrating tools like Microsoft Planner with your team. Here are some insights and recommendations based on what you’ve shared, which I share in more detail in the video:

    View Work-Life Balance as a Journey: Rather than seeing work-life balance as a fixed destination, it’s more helpful to view it as an ongoing journey. This perspective allows for flexibility and adaptation, acknowledging that some days or weeks might be more challenging than others.

    Incorporate Consistent Tools and Habits: To achieve effective work-life integration, it’s crucial to not only have the right tools but also to establish consistent habits that make the use of these tools part of your daily routine. Just as I shared in my video, using apps like Calm for meditation has helped me manage stress and maintain productivity through structured breaks like the Pomodoro technique.

    Maintaining Flexibility in Tool Usage: It’s okay to step away from certain tools occasionally. What’s important is returning to them when you realize they bring balance and peace to your life. This adaptability is key in managing not just tasks but also your mental well-being.

    Implement Practical, Routine-Based Strategies: Strategies such as a weekly review can dramatically reduce feelings of being overwhelmed and improve your organizational habits. Scheduling regular check-ins on your progress can guide you in managing your workload without feeling inundated.

    Choose and Stick to Appropriate Technologies: The effectiveness of any tool depends on it being integrated thoughtfully into your day-to-day activities. My experience with tools like Raindrop for bookmarking and Zotero for academic references emphasizes choosing technologies that fit seamlessly with your workflow. Also, avoiding frequent changes in your toolset helps in building a routine that you and your team can rely on.

    Continuous Commitment to Your Tools: Commit to your tools unless there’s a compelling reason to change. This consistency will help not only you but also your team in becoming more proficient with the technologies adopted and ultimately, more cohesive and functional as a unit.

    VIDEO

    Remember, the key to integrating any new tool or process effectively into your work-life system relies heavily on consistent usage and the development of supportive habits around it.

    Source link

  • The TRAP Test to Spot AI Deepfakes and How to NOT Be Deceived – Sovorel

    The TRAP Test to Spot AI Deepfakes and How to NOT Be Deceived – Sovorel

    Everyone needs to develop AI Literacy skills in order to use AI properly and increase effectiveness/efficiencies, yet another vital part of AI Literacy is to develop critical thinking and awareness skills to avoid being deceived by synthetic data such as AI created deepfakes. Cyber Magazine, an international news source, expressed the importance of this issue by stating:

    Deepfakes are inevitably becoming more advanced, which is making it harder to spot and stop those that are used with bad intentions. As access to synthetic media technology increases, deepfakes can be used to damage reputations, fabricate evidence and undermine trust.

    With deepfake technology increasingly being used for mal-intent, businesses would do well to ensure that their workforce is fully trained and aware of the risks associated with AI-generated content. (Jackson, 2023)

    To address this important issue I have created the TRAP test:

    T: Think Critically. All of us must now have a critical awareness and mindset when using any type of digital media since all digital media can now be easily manipulated and created with generative AI. When encountering any digital text, images, audio, or video we need to realize that it might not be real and it might be trying to manipulate our perception. We need to use the TRAP test to ask further questions to help ensure that we are getting the object truth.

    R: Realistic/Reliable/Reputable: When using digital media or viewing a video, we need to ask ourselves the question “does this seem real and is it likely to occur?” We must also consider whether or not the source of the information is reliable and if it is coming from a reputable source. Is it from an official source, a well known news source, a government agency, or established organization? Always check the source.

    A: Accurate/Authority: Check to see if all parts of the digital media are accurate. As an example, if watching a video, are all parts accurate and consistent. Are there any issues with the eyes, the background, or the light sources? Is it similar and consistent with other videos, images, or text? Additionally, has the media been released or authenticated by an authority? These questions must be verified and answered to help ensure validity and accuracy.

    P: Purpose/Propaganda: When reviewing any digital media we must ask ourselves, “what is the purpose of this media? If the answer is that they are trying to get your money or to sway your vote in an election then you should be extra sure that the information is completely truthful. Ask yourself if the digital information presented is simply just propaganda, full of bias and misleading. Be sure to ask if there is more to the story that you are reading/watching.

    Using the TRAP test and asking these questions will help to prevent everyone from being scammed and/or deceived. Students, faculty, and everyone must develop AI Literacy skills like these.

    All aspect of this defined AI Literacy are important (Anders, 2023), but Awareness and Critical Thinking are key in developing the proper mindset to use the TRAP test. This is something that must be continually developed and used in order to ensure its greatest effectiveness.

    All of us in academia must work to ensure that student and everyone else develop these skills to use AI in the right way and be able to properly spot AI deepfakes and avoid being deceived. Please share this information with colleagues, students, family, and friend; especially the elderly who can at times be even more vulnerable. Together we make a major difference and improve our new world filled with AI.

    A video describing the TRAP test is also available on the Sovorel Educational YouTube channel:

    “How to Spot a Deepfake and NOT Be Deceived” (Anders, 2024)

    Please share your thoughts and comment below:

    References

    Anders, B. (2023). The AI literacy imperative: Empowering instructors & students. Sovorel Publishing.

    Jackson, A. (2023, October 13). The rising tide of deepfakes as AI growth cause concern. Cyber Magazin, Technology: AI. https://cybermagazine.com/technology-and-ai/the-rising-tide-of-deepfakes-as-ai-growth-cause-concern

    Source link

  • Collateral Damage of the Rankings Obsession

    Collateral Damage of the Rankings Obsession

     UF Law slide from 21 to 28 in the US News Law School Rankings. Twenty-eight is not so bad and it, at least, avoids the dreaded 30. (I don’t mean to imply these rankings mean anything except to some University Presidents and law school deans on the make.)

    So why the slip? It’s actually pretty simple. US News began factoring in bar passage rate on which UF Law has historically done miserably given the caliber of students admitted. (Schools with nominally less capable students put UF to shame.)  The reasons UF underachieves is likely due to a number or reasons: a very high curve, students taking many hours of non graded courses often in tangential subjects, very few required bar courses and so on. 

    Since passage has been a problem for decades, why wasn’t it address before? That too has an easy answer. The ranking obsession of the Laura Rosenbury administration  and, I think, her chief benefactor Provost Glover,  did not deem it a pressing matter. Why? Because when only  rankings count and not whether graduating students can pass a bar exam, why worry about it. 

    Don’t get me wrong. I do not know if there is a correlation between passing the bar and succeeding as an attorney. I do know passing the bar is definitely correlated with being permitted to practice law and, there can be no “success” if you can’t get through the door. 

    So, UF is left with the collateral damage caused by a Dean who put self promotion ahead of duty to the students. In fact, I am told that that policy actually exasperated the bar passage issue. When confronted with “splitter students” — those with high LSAT and not comparable GPAs, the policy was to give the nod to the high LSAT students.  Yes, those would be the very bright ones who are likely over confident and lack the work ethic to pass the bar. Seems like a dumb policy but not when you realized that UF thought it did better in the rankings with this policy — that is, until bar passage counted.

    Of course, there is no accountability. Rosenbury is off to Barnard where she continues a policy that personally served her interests at Florida of limiting free speech. If this does not ring a bell, check it out in the Times. Presumably, that policy is also because it pleases those who are higher up.

    Source link

  • A Game Changing App for Faculty Researchers!

    A Game Changing App for Faculty Researchers!

    Consensus – A Game Changing App for Faculty Researchers

    Today, I started to utilize a new AI app for my research. This app, Consensus, is a game changer for faculty researchers. I wish that I had this app in graduate school – it would have definitely made life easier!

    Step 1 – Here are some screen shots of the software. You can type a question in the box (yes, a question) and the system does the work. Yes, the work that you would usually have to do!

    Step 2 – Then, AI does the rest. You receive AI-powered answers for your results. Consensus analyzes your results (before you even view them) and then summarizes the studies collectively.

    Step 3 – You can view the AI-powered answers which review each article for you.

    *I would also encourage you to review the article independently as well.

    Step 4 – View the study snapshots! Yes, a snapshot of the population, sample size, methods, outcomes measured, and more! Absolutely amazing!

    Step 5 – Click the “AI Synthesis” button to synthesize your results. Even better!

    Step 6 – Use the “powerful filters” button. You can view the “best” research results by: a) population, b) sample size, c) study design, d) journal quality, and other variables. 

    I plan to make a video soon, but please take a look at this video to discover exactly how Consensus can help you in your research! 

    ***

    Check out my book – Retaining College Students Using Technology: A Guidebook for Student Affairs and Academic Affairs Professionals.

    Remember to order copies for your team as well!


    Thanks for visiting! 


    Sincerely,


    Dr. Jennifer T. Edwards
    Professor of Communication

    Executive Director of the Texas Social Media Research Institute & Rural Communication Institute

    Source link

  • Using AI in Education is NOT an All or Nothing Endeavor – Sovorel

    Using AI in Education is NOT an All or Nothing Endeavor – Sovorel

    In working with many different instructors around the world, I still run into a lot of teachers and professors that think that using AI and teaching about AI Literacy in the classroom is an all or nothing endeavor. They have the false belief that you either have use AI in every part of your teaching, for every assignments, or you can’t use AI at all. The reality is that there is a full continuum of how an instructor can use and implement generative AI within their classroom.

    The infographic provided in this post is an example of the many different ways that an instructor could use generative AI within their teaching and learning process. To begin with an instructor could simply just talk about generative AI. This is beneficial on a multiple of levels in that for one it helps student understand that the instructor is at least aware of generative AI. Additionally, talking about AI helps students develop their AI Literacy skills which is something that all of us in academia must continually develop within ourselves so that we can can properly develop it within all of our students.

    The continuum of AI integration into learning that proceeds with different levels of use of AI in the classroom. This could be done in a way so that the instructor uses generative AI, such as ChatGPT, in front of the students so that then everyone can then discuss and answer questions about the interaction and the created results. Another way to implement could be that students use the AI in class for different activities. A more advanced way would be for students to have homework assignments where they would have to us the AI in some way to complete a task or as part of a group project.

    A key consideration with AI integration is that every instructor must be knowledgeable about the topic to be taught and their students needs. Instructors need to make purposeful choices as to when to us AI and in what ways. A great tool to help with the creating or redesigning assessments and assignments given that we know have generative AI is the following infographic titled “Redesigning Assignments & Assessment in Age of AI.”

    The SHARE Technique to Assist in Redesigning Assignments and Assessments in the Age of AI

    This infographic is very benifitial in that in addition to helping all with the creation of assignments/assessments in the age of AI, it helps instructors to create good and effective assignments/assessment in general. Faculty need to be purposful and really think about assignments and learning activeities in order to help students learn the material and also develop appropriate AI Literacy skills.

    View this following video for additional information on integrating AI in the classroom:

    What are your thoughts? Please add to the comments so that we can all learn from one another.

    Source link

  • Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

    Changes in SAT Scores after Test-optional

    One of the intended consequences of test-optional admission policies at some institutions prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was to raise test scores reported to US News and World Report.  It’s rare that you would see a proponent of test-optional admission like me admit that, but to deny it would be foolish.

    Because I worked at DePaul, which was an early adopter of the approach (at least among large universities), I fielded a lot of calls from colleagues who were considering it, some of whom were explicit in their reasons for doing so.  One person I spoke to came right out at the start of the call: She was only calling, she said, because her provost wanted to know how much they could raise scores if they went test-optional.

    If I sensed or heard that motivation, I advised people against it.  In those days, the vast majority of students took standardized admission tests like the SAT or ACT, but the percentage of students applying without tests was still relatively small; the needle would not move appreciably by going to test-optional admission.  

    On the other hand, of course, I knew the pressure admissions offices were under by trustees, presidents, provosts, and faculty, and as Campbell’s Law and its many variants tells us, what gets measured gets produced.  DePaul, a private university with a public mission, was using a test-optional approach to ensure those students who were a part of our mission would not be left behind as applications grew.  (I often say how lucky I was to work at a place where–in 17 years–I was never once asked about how to increase test scores or selectivity, but I heard frequently about the Pell percentage in the class.)

    If you wanted different outcomes, there were lots of ways to manipulate admissions statistics to effect the same outcome, I’d tell the callers.

    Motivations, of course, were different in the summer of 2020, when it had become clear that test-optional admission was a necessary utilitarian decision that also carried with it good reputational benefits: Even if you were doing it to survive, you could at least look like you were being altruistic.  And, of course, you could learn something in the process.

    So what’s happened? About what you would expect.  At the overwhelming majority of colleges, the Mean SAT EWR+M score has risen between the fall of 2019 and 2022.  I used 2019 as the base because the data reported to IPEDS is for enrolling students, and the 2020 term was affected by COVID. 

    It’s dangerous, of course, to try to figure out exactly why they went up, other than the expected sampling bias.  It could be that reputation that drove such things was already increasing.  It could be that the college took a lot more or a lot fewer chances in admission (either is possible); it could be location and migration (out on the west coast, people care about tests, it seems, a lot less than they do in the Eastern Time Zone), and students who cross state lines to attend college tend to be wealthier, and wealthier students tend to score higher on tests.

    Or it could be all of those things, and others.  We’ll never really know.  But it’s still fun to look at.  So here we go, with just one view this time.

    One the left are mean SAT scores in 2019 and 2022, calculated from the reported 25th and 75th percentiles of the two sections.  Numbers are rounded. On the left are gray bars with the 2019 figure, and purple bars with the 2022 score.  On the right are the changes, and the chart is sorted on the value in descending order.

    There are four filters to get the view you want: At top left you can use the control to limit the region; at top right you can look at public and/or private four-year universities.  You can also use the sliders to look at colleges by limiting the 2022 selectivity or class size.

    Again, this is interesting, but not necessarily instructive.  See if you can guess what your favorite college looks like before and after the pandemic.  Have fun.

    (Note: Some institutions that went test-optional stopped reporting test scores as a result, and they are not included here.)

    Source link

  • Ethan Mollick Shares Principles for Working with AI on Coaching for Leaders with Dave Stachowiak

    Ethan Mollick Shares Principles for Working with AI on Coaching for Leaders with Dave Stachowiak

    I enjoyed listening to Coaching for Leaders episode 674: Principles for working with AI with Ethan Mollick this morning. Dave is traveling this week, but it was almost like he was here, keeping me company, as I listened to the interview. 😂

    One key point from the conversation that really resonated with me was how quick and easy it is to assess the AI’s output, it if is doing something that you’re already good at. I have found many examples of that truth, in experimenting with various AI tools.

    We use the CastMagic.io service for the first pass at our podcast transcripts, for example. It can identify key quotes from the interviews and recommend discussion questions. For me (or someone on our team) to carve out the time to listen to the entire episode and try to figure out which quotes might be good to share just isn’t practical. Yet we can quickly look and discard what the tool identified as not particularly helpful in illuminating or amplifying the conversation.

    In a recent workshop with faculty, they were surprised to learn how easy it is to set up a form for students to make a request for a letter of recommendation or reference for a job or for grad school. Then, an AI can take the first pass at writing a draft, based on your writing style and preferences for length, tone, etc. How much easier is it to correct it for what it got wrong about a particular student’s recommendation vs starting from scratch?

    I’ve been using an AI app called Whisper Memos, which is on both my iPhone and on my Apple Watch. When I get an idea or something I want to share with someone, I just tap the complication on my watch face and start talking. The key differentiator for Whisper Memos for me is that it automatically puts in carriage returns, making it that much faster for me to make edits later on.

    Another thing I like is that I discovered my favorite “chicken scratch” notes app on my iPhone and Apple Watch, Drafts, has a special email address I can use to send text to it. So now I have Whisper Memos set up to send to my unique Drafts email address and all my thoughts wind up in one place, ready for me to process when I have time.

    I encourage you to listen to episode 674 with Ethan Mollick on Coaching for Leaders with Dave Stachowiak. When you’re done, check out the AI-related conversations that I’ve had for Teaching in Higher Ed.

    How are you using AI in your work these days?

    Source link

  • Podcast with D2L’s Cristi Ford on Durable Skills and AI –

    Podcast with D2L’s Cristi Ford on Durable Skills and AI –

    I was delighted to speak with Cristi Ford, D2L’s VP of Academic Affairs, about durable skills and AI in higher education. You can find the episode in all the usual places:

    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-teaching-skills-can-complement-the-use-of-ai/id1663544722?i=1000649960964

    Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1iYsMHqAKXzts9i4skDHPE

    YouTube (audio only): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE6bbJHSa-A

    Show Notes: https://www.d2l.com/podcasts/teach-and-learn/how-teaching-skills-can-complement-the-use-of-ai-in-education-with-michael-feldstein/

    Cristi is a delightful, thoughtful educator and a pleasure to talk with about these important issues. (Side note: D2L is building up a very impressive staff roster. They have more people I would gladly share a meal with—and more that I would call my personal friends—than any other company in EdTech today.)

    The podcast flowed directly from a talk I gave at a D2L Ignite conference in Orlando, which, I’m gratified to say, has brought me more meaningful feedback and new connections than any talk I’ve given in a long time. We often talk aspirationally about AI being a humanizing technology. In my talk, I start by putting the idea of rapid change, including AI, in the context of humans learning from other humans. The heart of the talk is my own deeply personal story about how ChatGPT helped me cope with a terrible crisis. And I close by arguing that teaching skills are durable skills. Cristi was in the audience. Much of our podcast conversation elaborates on some of those themes in what was a packed 45-minute talk.

    Below, you can see my original talk, recorded for my hospitalized sister on my iPhone.

    AI and Durable Skills Keynote at D2L’s Ignite Orlando Summit



    Source link