Category: Safety and Health

  • Resilience and Psychological Safety: Navigating Uncertainty

    Resilience and Psychological Safety: Navigating Uncertainty

    by Julie Burrell | February 26, 2025

    The first two months of 2025 have brought no shortage of change and uncertainty to higher ed institutions. Amid that uncertainty, you may find yourself not only navigating a wave of new compliance requirements, but also supporting employees who are feeling overwhelmed or worried. When change is happening at a rapid pace, it can be challenging to think strategically about how to manage emotional responses to change.

    However, two approaches you probably honed during the COVID-19 pandemic — fostering resilience and psychological safety — can be particularly useful in times like these.

    Resilience is a set of tools we use to regulate our response to stress. It’s what allows us to survive during moments of crisis and learn to grow. Psychological safety is a management approach that allows employees to thrive and adapt to stressful situations. We feel psychologically safe when we’re able to take risks knowing we’ll be supported.

    Combined, these workplace strategies tap into emotional resources we already have and can further develop and strengthen.

    Strengthening Internal Resilience

    You may never have stopped to reflect on how you endured the pandemic, but it likely took a great deal of resilience. Learning to survive, and even flourish, in tough times calls for a store of personal resilience, which the American Psychological Association defines as “successfully adapting to difficult or challenging life experiences, especially through mental, emotional, and behavioral flexibility.”

    Some people just appear to be more naturally resilient than others. Maybe they seem tougher or more inclined to go with the flow. But resilience isn’t an innate trait we’re born with. It’s a skill that can be learned and practiced.

    In her Resilience in the Workplace webinar, Maureen De Armond, chief human resources officer at Des Moines University Medicine and Health Sciences, identified the four key factors that make up resilience:

    1. Identifying your purpose and values
    2. Gaining confidence
    3. Seeking support from your networks
    4. Learning adaptability

    A Quick Resilience Exercise on Personal Values

    Even a 15-minute resilience-building exercise can be effective, such as this brief reflection shared in the webinar.

    First, write down a list of five answers to the question, “why is it worth it to persevere and get through this challenging time?” For example, do you want to model certain behavior for your children? Do you want to be compassionate to your coworkers? Do you want to steward your team through change? Do you want to support your friends and family?

    Second, figure out the why behind each of these five answers by identifying the value behind each. Values can include achievement, compassion, economic security, humor, leadership, passion, etc. (Here’s a handy checklist.)

    Finally, be proactive about reminding yourself of these values:

    • Display photos that represent your values so that you see them every day — a loved one, beloved pet, a favorite spot on a hike, a trip you’re planning, an inspirational public figure.
    • Place quotes that illustrate these values around your workspace.
    • Craft an inspiration board, either on a digital whiteboard or as a physical craft, that contains photos, symbols, images and words that demonstrate your values.
    • Get out of your office and take a walk. Especially if you work on campus, this can be a reminder of your community and of the student population the higher ed workforce serves.

    Think of these proactive reminders as a “battery pack,” De Armond says, that will give you a boost or a nudge to get out of a negative head space. Helping employees tap into and strengthen their own resilience will equip them for whatever lies ahead.

    The Role of Psychological Safety in Managing Uncertainty

    While it’s natural for people to seek safety and solace in a time of upheaval, psychological safety isn’t about providing comfort or promoting kindness, as important as these are. Rather, it’s about candor, trust and accountability among teams. It allows team members to speak up about mistakes (including their own), tolerate risk, and embrace discomfort and change.

    Amy Edmonson, an expert on team psychological safety in the workplace, defines psychological safety as “the shared belief that’s it’s okay to take risks, express ideas and concerns, speak up with questions, and admit mistakes without fear of negative consequences.”

    For example, what happens when a team member goes to their supervisor with a question, admits a mistake, or notices a colleague’s error? If that supervisor gets angry or becomes dismissive, the employee may stay quiet in the future and even cover up mistakes to avoid that reaction again. But if the supervisor adopts some of the tips below, the team feels safe enough to take risks and can weather storms as a group.

    Recommendations to Increase Psychological Safety

    • Encourage people to come to you with problems and thank them for doing so. Also ask, “how can I help?”
    • Adopt a learning mindset. In the example above, an angry or dismissive supervisor also missed the chance to ask, “what did you learn?” As psychological safety experts know, “organizations characterized by a learning orientation focus on curiosity and continuous improvement, and they make it safe for organizational members to admit what they do not know or perhaps got wrong.” If you have a Learning and Development team, they can offer practices for adopting a learning mindset.
    • Listen rather than talk. Leaders are expected to have all the answers, but unless immediate action is needed, pausing and getting all the facts, and listening to feelings, can be an important leadership tool. Reflective listening — repeating or paraphrasing what’s said or reflecting a feeling that’s expressed — is a particularly useful skill for creating trust.
    • Say, “I don’t know.” Leaders modeling psychological safety admit when they don’t know something, allowing others in their organization to adopt a curious mindset. This is what Brené Brown calls “the courage to not know.”
    • Celebrate small wins. Appreciating your employees matters now more than ever.
    • Take care of yourself and your team. HR is often expected, fairly or not, to manage tension and conflicting emotions. How are you showing up for yourself and your team?

    For more tips on increasing psychological safety, see the article Why Psychological Safety Matters Now More Than Ever by Allison M. Vaillancourt, vice president and senior consultant at Segal.

    Finally, Give Grace

    Giving grace to others during stressful and uncertain times can be a small but critical daily practice, one that builds compassion and trust. But we need to extend that same grace to ourselves. Set boundaries, take breaks, practice going slow, and share the load.

    Related CUPA-HR Resources

    Resilience in the Workplace — This CUPA-HR webinar, recorded in 2021, was designed to serve as resilience training for attendees, as well as a model that could easily be replicated at your institution for HR teams and other employees.

    Why Psychological Safety Matters Now More Than Ever — This article offers practical advice for increasing psychological safety, specifically for the higher ed workplace.

    Recent Executive Orders and Higher Ed HR’s Role in Creating and Sustaining an Inclusive Campus Community — A message from CUPA-HR President and CEO Andy Brantley.

    Mental Health Toolkit — This HR toolkit includes resources on sustaining mental health programs on campus and addressing problems like burnout.

    The Great Pivot from Resilience to Adaptability — This article explains how to move from resilience to adaptability and, ultimately, growth in challenging times for higher education.

    Managing Stress and Self-Care: “No” Is a Complete Sentence — This highly rated webinar shows how and why setting boundaries is critical to thriving.

    Trauma-Informed Leadership for Higher Education — This webinar explores how to develop a supportive leadership style and how to create a culture where team members can depend on each other for support during times of hardship.



    Source link

  • Suicide Prevention and Awareness: Four Ways HR Can Lead the Conversation – CUPA-HR

    Suicide Prevention and Awareness: Four Ways HR Can Lead the Conversation – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | August 31, 2022

    This blog post was contributed by Maureen De Armond, Executive Director, Human Resources at Drake University.

    In higher education, we must plan for many worst-case scenarios, including tornados, fires, active-shooter situations, and, as we now know, pandemics. Among this wide range of difficult scenarios that could present themselves on our campuses at any time, suicide is one that deserves more attention and discussion.

    Like other scenarios, suicide prevention and planning should contain at least these components: awareness and prevention at the front end; crisis-response protocols to deploy in the moment; and post-incident support and debriefing.

    Here are four ways HR can take the lead on awareness and prevention efforts:

    Normalize Mental Health Conversations

    HR can set the example in normalizing conversations about mental health. From new employee orientation to leadership trainings to trainings offered during open enrollment, make mental health as normal a topic to discuss as being sick with the flu or needing rehab due to an injured back. We know that mental health carries a stigma; openly discussing mental health helps chip away at that stigma.

    Coordinate Messaging

    Tailor communications to your institution’s practices and use more than one channel for communication. If your institution sends newsletters, plan articles for each week of September. Consider emails as well. Be sure to provide your leadership teams with prepared messages and information they can share with their teams. Point them to helplines, training opportunities, reminders about EAPs, and tips for what to do and where to go if they or someone they know is having mental health crisis.

    Collaborative messaging sent from campus and community partners can also create a widespread impact. Consider reaching out to student services, the provost’s office, Title IX/Equal Opportunity, campus safety, student senate, faculty senate, student counseling, faculty subject matter experts, and your institution’s employee assistance program (EAP) providers and health plan partners to team up on mental health messaging throughout the month.

    Train, Train, Train

    Offer learning and development opportunities that focus on mental health awareness as well as suicide prevention. This fall semester, Drake University is offering Question, Persuade and Refer suicide prevention training in addition to Mental Health First Aid for Higher Education for faculty and staff. Faculty partners are facilitating these sessions. We’ve found that having faculty-led sessions can help attract faculty attendees, leverage internal expertise and offer faculty additional forms of service to the institution.

    Inventory Resources, Benefits and Policies

    Take a fresh look at your well-being/wellness programming. Does it appropriately address mental health? Explore what resources and trainings may be available through your existing EAP contracts. Does your health plan offer virtual doctor’s visits for mental health care? If so, shine a spotlight on those resources. Making mental health care as accessible as possible may mean more people will consider using it. Review sick, personal and other paid-time-off leave policies to ensure mental health is clearly addressed. This includes handbook and web language, too.

    While suicide awareness and prevention shouldn’t be a once-a-year conversation, September is a great month for HR to demonstrate leadership in normalizing conversations about mental health and suicide prevention and planning.

    Related resources:

    Reassessing Your Institution’s EAP: Steps for HR Pros to Increase Awareness and Accessibility (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    HEERF Funds Can Be Used to Support Mental Health Resources (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Mental Health Month Focus: Higher Ed Campus Culture (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)



    Source link

  • Reassessing Your Institution’s EAP: Steps for HR Pros to Increase Awareness and Accessibility – CUPA-HR

    Reassessing Your Institution’s EAP: Steps for HR Pros to Increase Awareness and Accessibility – CUPA-HR

    by Lakyn Whaley | May 2, 2022

    May is Mental Health Month. Throughout the month, be sure to join the Connect discussion in the General Discussion group to discuss challenges and successes, as well as pose questions and offer advice to higher ed HR peers on the topic of mental health. A Zoom discussion will also take place mid-May. Stay tuned for the link to be posted in the Connect discussion. 

    Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) are nothing new. In fact, 97 percent of large employers offer an EAP as part of their benefits package. Yet, the utilization rate of these programs is abysmally low, clocking in at an average of less than 5 percent even as concerns around mental health continue to grow. EAPs should be a key resource for struggling employees, so why isn’t anybody using them?

    Lack of Awareness

    Lack of awareness, on multiple levels, plays a large role in the underutilization of EAPs. Usually, employees are introduced to their organization’s EAP and other benefits during their onboarding process. However, the deluge of information new employees are exposed to during this time can easily wash out any memory of an EAP mention.

    In addition, there’s a general lack of awareness as to how EAPs function. People may form their own incorrect assumptions, such as thinking that participating in an EAP will incur an immediate cost or that EAP use will be reflected on performance evaluations, which keep them from accessing this benefit.

    Distrust and Stigma

    From grief counseling to connecting employees to legal resources, the situations that EAPs are designed to provide support for can often be deeply personal. Because of this, some employees may be concerned that personal details or other information related to their EAP access will be shared with their employers, since the EAP is an employer-sponsored program. Others may be hesitant to interact with EAPs due to the stigma surrounding mental and behavioral health topics.

    Accessibility

    If employees are aware and comfortable accessing their organization’s EAP, the next challenge they often have to surmount is the myriad steps required to connect with the resources and services they need. Many of the individuals who would benefit from using an EAP are already operating under higher levels of stress and may be more fatigued than their peers. This can mean that these employees are less likely to have the energy needed to engage with extended processes, even when they’re the ones who need it most.

    How Can HR help?

    It might feel like the issues listed above are too big for one department — and in some cases one person — to overcome, but there are steps you can take to help.

    Start by looking at your organization’s EAP from an employee perspective and map out the steps someone needs to take to access services. Ask questions along the way such as: How many steps are there? How do employees learn more about their EAP? What options are there for contacting someone? Might the hours of service be prohibitive to some? Are the services provided meeting a variety of needs? Note too where you notice the potential for confusion or frustration within the process and remember that if something can be simplified, it should be simplified!

    Once you’ve reassessed the EAP process, take some time to examine how your campus is talking about mental health in general. While communication about the EAP is necessary for program awareness, by itself it’s not enough to improve utilization. Double down on efforts to reduce stigma around mental health and mental illness. Creating a culture where employees feel safe to talk about their mental health and welcome to bring their whole selves to the table has myriad benefits — only one of which is improving EAP usage.

    Related resources:

    Mental Health Toolkit (CUPA-HR members-only resource)

    Destigmatizing Mental Health on Campus: What Can HR Do (Higher Ed HR Magazine)

    Right Direction – Free Turnkey Resources for Organizations to Address Mental Health in the Workplace



    Source link

  • Tools to Build a Harassment-Free Higher Ed Workplace – CUPA-HR

    Tools to Build a Harassment-Free Higher Ed Workplace – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | March 30, 2022

    Sexual violence is a multi-faceted and difficult topic. Higher ed institutions either enter the conversation before an event of sexual violence has occurred or after it has occurred, leaving the institution scrambling for answers to the campus community as to why it happened in the first place.

    As part of upcoming Sexual Assault Awareness Month (April), we’re highlighting some CUPA-HR resources that share first-hand experiences from some higher ed institutions and the strategies and trainings they’ve used to respond to and approach the topic of sexual violence on campus.

    Strategies to Create a Harassment-Free Workplace

    In an article in the spring 2020 issue of Higher Ed HR Magazine, UMass Lowell detailed how they addressed concerns about a sexual harassment complaint the university received several years prior that spurred anger among students, faculty and staff. Questions were raised as to how decisions were made following the violation, whether the sanctions were sufficiently severe and what steps were taken to mitigate risk of recurrence.

    In response, the chancellor convened a task force to review the university’s Title IX policies and procedures, educational efforts, culture and climate, and communications on these issues, and to make a set of recommendations to the executive cabinet for future improvements. Read the full article to learn about how the task force practiced transparency, built trust among the community and key themes that emerged in the recommendations from the task force: A Matter of Trust: Strategies for Creating a Harassment-Free Workplace

    Impactful, Engaging In-Person Sexual Harassment Training

    While training alone isn’t the answer to creating a harassment-free environment, it certainly should be part of an institution’s broader strategy. However, in order to make an impact, the training must be engaging, insightful, interactive and relatable — and sitting at a desk clicking through an online training module or watching a video about workplace harassment is anything but engaging. With an in-person training approach, participants can ask questions, engage one another in dialogue, and connect to the content, making the messaging more likely to stick.

    Explore the benefits of and barriers to in-person sexual harassment training, as well as examples of interactive in-person training activities in the article A Thoughtful Approach: How to Conduct Impactful, Engaging In-Person Sexual Harassment Training.

    Additional Sexual Harassment Resources

    CUPA-HR’s Title IX and Sexual Harassment Toolkit is a great place to check out what other institutions are doing to mitigate sexual harassment and misconduct. The toolkit highlights sexual harassment and reporting policies, trainings and other tools for HR pros.

    By tapping into these resources, higher ed institutions can positions themselves as those that prioritize prevention over reaction when it comes to sexual violence on campus.

    Related resources:

    How Institutions Are Leveraging Partnerships and Education to Address Sexual Harassment and As

    4 Ways to Mitigate Risk Related to Sexual Misconduct and Harassment on Campus

    Sexual Harassment Resources



    Source link

  • Read and Listen to Inspiring CUPA-HR Content From 2021 – CUPA-HR

    Read and Listen to Inspiring CUPA-HR Content From 2021 – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | January 5, 2022

    Throughout 2021, HR practitioners have proven their resilience time and again by positively impacting higher education not only in response to the ever-evolving pandemic, but also in building more flexible, diverse and inclusive workplaces. CUPA-HR captured many of these higher ed success stories, as well as leadership advice, helpful resources and workforce data trends in the following articles, podcasts and blog posts.

    As you read and listen to the inspiring work your HR colleagues are doing at colleges and universities around the country, we encourage you to jot down ideas to take into the year ahead: 

    Retention and Engagement 

    Develop to Retain: Tools and Resources for Higher Ed Professional Development (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Maintaining Culture and Connection for Remote Employees (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Stay tuned for an article in the upcoming winter issue of Higher Ed HR Magazine: “Four Areas HR Can Address Now to Boost Retention and Engagement.”

    Future of Work 

    New Report Highlights Changes to the Professional Workforce in the Wake of the Pandemic (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    New Report Highlights Changes to Faculty Workforce in the Wake of the Pandemic (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Navigating Compliance With a Multi-State Workforce (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Determining Remote Work Eligibility and Talking to Leadership About Flexible Work (CUPA-HR Soundbite)

    Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion 

    5 CHROs Use CUPA-HR’s DEI Maturity Index to Energize Their DEI Efforts (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    A Mission for Greater Faculty Diversity — Oakland University’s Diversity Advocate Program (Higher Ed HR Magazine)

    Can HR Investigators Be Anti-Racist? — Action Steps to Overcome Racial Bias When Conducting Workplace Investigations (Higher Ed HR Magazine)

    Juneteenth — How Will Your Institution Observe the Day? (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Supporting the LGBTQ+ Community in Higher Ed — 3 Learning Resources for HR (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Three Ways HR Can Promote Cultural Appreciation Over Appropriation (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Boost Your Pay Equity Know-How By Tapping Into These Resources (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Mental Health

    Mental Health Month Focus: Resources (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    Strategies to Become More Resilient in Work and Life (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    HR Care Package — Resources for Self-Care (The Higher Ed Workplace Blog)

    HR Leadership 

    CUPA-HR Conversations: Higher Ed HR Turns 75 (CUPA-HR Podcast)

    Why Psychological Safety Matters Now More Than Ever (Higher Ed HR Magazine)

    Opening Doors for Strategic Partnerships With Academic Leadership (Higher Ed HR Magazine)



    Source link

  • IRS Issues Employer Guidance on COVID-19 Paid Leave Tax Credits – CUPA-HR

    IRS Issues Employer Guidance on COVID-19 Paid Leave Tax Credits – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | September 22, 2021

    On September 7, the U.S. Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2021-53, which includes guidance to employers on reporting the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees for leave taken in 2021 as provided by the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

    The FFCRA required private sector employers with 500 or fewer employees to provide emergency paid family and medical leave and emergency paid sick leave to employees who could not work or telework due to certain COVID-19 complications. The FFCRA also established fully refundable tax credits that employers may receive after providing the emergency paid family and sick leave. The tax credits under the FFCRA were set to expire on December 31, 2020, but they were extended to cover wages voluntarily paid through March 31, 2021 under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and again through September 30, 2021 under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Employers were no longer required to provide the paid sick and family and medical leave wages to employees after the enactment of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, but employers that voluntarily provided paid leave that would have satisfied the paid family leave and paid sick leave requirements under the FFCRA were eligible for the same fully refundable tax credits.

    The new IRS notice states that employers will be required to report the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees between January 1 and September 30, 2021 either on the Form W-2, Box 14, or in a separate statement provided with the Form W-2. The notice also includes model language to help employers communicate information about the qualified sick leave and family and medical leave wages to employees, as well as the impact these wages may have on tax credits the employee may be entitled to with respect to self-employment income.

    CUPA-HR will keep members apprised of any additional tax-related guidance from the IRS as it relates to COVID-19 policies and guidance.



    Source link

  • HR and the Courts – CUPA-HR

    HR and the Courts – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | September 21, 2021

    Each month, CUPA-HR General Counsel Ira Shepard provides an overview of several labor and employment law cases and regulatory actions with implications for the higher ed workplace. Here’s the latest from Ira.

    EEOC Brings Its First COVID-19 Teleworking Denial Lawsuit Under the Americans With Disabilities Act  

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently brought its first denial of a disability accommodation lawsuit connected to the pandemic. The employer in question denied an employee’s request to continue teleworking. The employee claimed that her heart problems heightened her COVID-19 risk. The case was filed in federal district court in Georgia (EEOC v. ISS Facility Services Inc. (N.D. Ga., No. 1:21-CV-3708-SCJ-RDC, comp filed, 9/7/21)).

    The employee’s accommodation request was that she be allowed to work from home two days per week. The plant where she worked reopened following a multi-month period where all employees telecommuted, including the plaintiff. The employee also asked to be allowed to take frequent breaks when working on-site three days per week because her pulmonary condition caused her to have difficulty breathing. The EEOC alleged that while the employee’s accommodation request was rejected, other employees were allowed to work from home. Additionally, the EEOC alleged that the employee was terminated after her accommodation request was denied.

    The EEOC released the following statement about the case: “In light of the additional risks to health and safety created by COVID-19, it is particularly concerning that an employer would take this action several months into a global pandemic.” The EEOC is seeking back pay, compensation for past and future pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, punitive damages and a permanent injunction.

    Union Decertification Elections and the Percentage of Actual Union Losses Rise in the First Half of 2021 Compared to 2020

    Union decertification elections in the first half of 2021 increased by 30 percent over the number of decertification elections supervised by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) during the same period in 2020. In contrast, NLRB-supervised certification elections increased by only 4 percent during the same period in 2021 as compared to 2020 according to NLRB reports published by the Bloomberg Daily Labor Report.

    Unions lost two-thirds of the decertification elections supervised by the NLRB in the first half of 2021. This is an increase of 64 percent over the number of losses unions incurred in the first half 2020.

    Community College Disability Plans Exempt From ERISA as a Governmental Plan — Federal Court Remands Plaintiff’s Case to State Court to Proceed Under Applicable State Law

    A former community college employee can seek relief from denial of disability benefits under state law as the federal court hearing the case ruled that community college plans are exempt from the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) as a governmental plan. The federal court ruled that relief may be available to the employee under state law, as there is no federal jurisdiction.

    The case involved a former employee of St. Louis Community College who had been receiving disability benefits under the plan for about five years. Disability benefits continuation was denied by the plan administrator. The plan was administered by American General Life insurance. The case was originally filed in state court but was removed to federal court alleging jurisdiction under ERISA. The federal district court judge dismissed the case, concluding that the plan was established by a governmental entity and as such there was no ERISA jurisdiction. The judge remanded the case to proceed in state court to determine whether the plaintiff is subject to relief under state law (Glover v. American General Life Insurance Company (2021 BL 297552, N.D. Ill., no. 3:21-cv-50205, 8/6/21)).

    Former Director of University Family Law Clinic Who Was Denied a Permanent Position to Head the Clinic and a Professorship Alleges Ageism

    A Pennsylvania attorney who was over 60 when he was recruited to run the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Law Family Law Clinic has filed an age discrimination lawsuit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 after he was passed over when the position became a full-time faculty position and the university allegedly chose an attorney who was under 40 with little experience in parental custody issues routinely handled by the clinic (Congelio v. University of Pittsburgh (W.D. Pa. No. 2:21-cv-902, complaint filed 7/13/21)).

    According to the age discrimination complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the person who was hired for the position and as a faculty member was not licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania where the university and the law clinic are located. The plaintiff was a visiting professor at the law school when he was not selected for the position to continue running the clinic with the accompanying full-time faculty appointment.



    Source link