Category: Teaching and Learning

  • Reflective teaching: the “small shifts” that quietly change everything

    Reflective teaching: the “small shifts” that quietly change everything

    by Yetunde Kolajo

    If you’ve ever left a lecture thinking “That didn’t land the way I hoped” (or “That went surprisingly well – why?”), you’ve already stepped into reflective teaching. The question is whether reflection remains a private afterthought … or becomes a deliberate practice that improves teaching in real time and shapes what we do next.

    In Advancing pedagogical excellence through reflective teaching practice and adaptation I explored reflective teaching practice (RTP) in a first-year chemistry context at a New Zealand university, asking a deceptively simple question: How do lecturers’ teaching philosophies shape what they actually do to reflect and adapt their teaching?

    What the study did

    I interviewed eight chemistry lecturers using semi-structured interviews, then used thematic analysis to examine two connected strands: (1) teaching concepts/philosophy and (2) lecturer-student interaction. The paper distinguishes between:

    • Reflective Teaching (RT): the broader ongoing process of critically examining your teaching.
    • Reflective Teaching Practice (RTP): the day-to-day strategies (journals, feedback loops, peer dialogue, etc) that make reflection actionable.

    Reflection is uneven and often unsystematic

    A striking finding is that not all lecturers consistently engaged in reflective practices, and there wasn’t clear evidence of a shared, structured reflective culture across the teaching team. Some lecturers could articulate a teaching philosophy, but this didn’t always translate into a repeatable reflection cycle (before, during, and after teaching). I  framed this using Dewey and Schön’s well-known reflection stages:

    • Reflection-for-action (before teaching): planning with intention
    • Reflection-in-action (during teaching): adjusting as it happens
    • Reflection-on-action (after teaching): reviewing to improve next time

    Even where lecturers were clearly committed and experienced, reflection could still become fragmented, more like “minor tweaks” than a consistent, evidence-informed practice.

    The real engine of reflection: lecturer-student interaction

    Interaction isn’t just a teaching technique – it’s a reflection tool.

    Student questions, live confusion, moments of silence, a sudden “Ohhh!” – these are data. In the study, the clearest examples of reflection happening during teaching came from lecturers who intentionally built in interaction (eg questioning strategies, pausing for problem-solving).

    One example stands out: Denise’s in-class quiz is described as the only instance that embodied all three reflection components using student responses to gauge understanding, adapting support during the activity, and feeding insights forward into later planning.

    Why this matters right now in UK HE

    UK higher education is navigating increasing diversity in student backgrounds, expectations, and prior learning alongside sharper scrutiny of teaching quality and inclusion. In that context, reflective teaching isn’t “nice-to-have CPD”; it’s a way of ensuring our teaching practices keep pace with learners’ needs, not just disciplinary content.

    The paper doesn’t argue for abandoning lectures. Instead, it shows how reflective practice can help lecturers adapt within lecture-based structures especially through purposeful interaction that shifts students from passive listening toward more active/constructive engagement (drawing on engagement ideas such as ICAP).

    Three “try this tomorrow” reflective moves (small, practical, high impact)

    1. Plan one interaction checkpoint (not ten). Add a single moment where you must learn something from students (a hinge question, poll, mini-problem, or “explain it to a partner”). Use it as reflection-for-action.
    1. Name your in-the-moment adjustment. When you pivot (slow down, re-explain, swap an example), briefly acknowledge it: “I’m noticing this is sticky – let’s try a different route.” That’s reflection-in-action made visible.
    1. End with one evidence-based note to self. Not “Went fine.” Instead: “35% missed X in the quiz – next time: do Y before Z.” That’s reflection-on-action you can actually reuse.

    Questions to spark conversation (for you or your teaching team)

    • Where does your teaching philosophy show up most clearly: content coverage, student confidence, relevance, or interaction?
    • Which “data” do you trust most: NSS/module evaluation, informal comments, in-class responses, attainment patterns and why?

    If your programme is team-taught, what would a shared reflective framework look like in practice (so reflection isn’t isolated and inconsistent)?

    If reflective teaching is the intention, this article is the nudge: make reflection visible, structured, and interaction-led, so adaptation becomes a habit, not a heroic one-off.

    Dr Yetunde Kolajo is a Student Success Research Associate at the University of Kent. Her research examines pedagogical decision-making in higher education, with a focus on students’ learning experiences, critical thinking and decolonising pedagogies. Drawing on reflective teaching practice, she examines how inclusive and reflective teaching frameworks can enhance student success.

    Author: SRHE News Blog

    An international learned society, concerned with supporting research and researchers into Higher Education

    Source link

  • “Say My Name, Say My Name”: Why Learning Names Improves Student Success – Faculty Focus

    “Say My Name, Say My Name”: Why Learning Names Improves Student Success – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • “Say My Name, Say My Name”: Why Learning Names Improves Student Success – Faculty Focus

    “Say My Name, Say My Name”: Why Learning Names Improves Student Success – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • The Final Stretch: Designing a Meaningful Course Ending – Faculty Focus

    The Final Stretch: Designing a Meaningful Course Ending – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • The Final Stretch: Designing a Meaningful Course Ending – Faculty Focus

    The Final Stretch: Designing a Meaningful Course Ending – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • Uni boosts gender diversity by 30% in maths – Campus Review

    Uni boosts gender diversity by 30% in maths – Campus Review

    As the artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing industries explode, trained STEM professionals are in high demand. Mathematics is foundational to these fields.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • Tutorials must persevere at unis: Opinion – Campus Review

    Tutorials must persevere at unis: Opinion – Campus Review

    Monash University has announced it will replace tutorials for senior law students with seminars that encourage “active learning activities” but have significantly larger class sizes.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • Tech Transformation: Why skills matter

    Tech Transformation: Why skills matter

    I’ve just returned from a school evaluation visit.  One of the things I most enjoy about these visits is having time with schools to discuss their programme development plans.  In the case of my recent visit, the plan was about the ATL skills.

    Many schools recognise that learning skills is essential – but the question remains WHAT skills – in a recent article I read that 35% of current key skills are projected to change.  This implies to me that the most important skills are those that transfer to what is needed outside of school – in life and work.

    The Future of Jobs Report 2025 considers skills that will be needed by 2030 given projected changes in global employment, rapid technological advances, and economic instability.  The forecast is that 170 million new jobs will be created, but 92 million will disappear – as a result almost 60% of workers will require reskilling over the next 5 years – and this of course has a huge impact on what schools need to teach.

    Jobs that require routine skills are declining, whereas jobs that involve digital, analytical and design thinking skills are on the increase.  A lot of this is being driven by technology such as automation and AI.  Another area of rapid expansion is the “green economy” with a focus on sustainability.  These jobs are linked to environmental science, clean energy and sustainable design, requiring skills of systems thinking and ethical reasoning.  And in this world of shifting economics and geopolitics, collaboration, strategic thinking and resilience are all called for.

    There are demographic shifts driving these changes too – as the world’s population is aging there are more demands for healthcare and caregiving – these require more interpersonal skills such as empathy.  

    In IB schools we have long recognised that it is not enough to master content – skills need to be explicitly taught and practiced, and woven into learning experiences.  Pedagogical approaches such as project-based learning and teaching through transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary units will help students develop transferable skills.  And perhaps most important of all, teachers also need to engage in continuous professional learning to keep pace with all these changes.

    Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

    Source link

  • How Building Rapport Helped My Students Take Risks – Faculty Focus

    How Building Rapport Helped My Students Take Risks – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • How Building Rapport Helped My Students Take Risks – Faculty Focus

    How Building Rapport Helped My Students Take Risks – Faculty Focus

    Source link