Blog

  • ED to Investigate Brown Over Campus Shooting

    ED to Investigate Brown Over Campus Shooting

    The Department of Education is investigating whether Brown University violated the Clery Act in relation to a campus shooting earlier this month that left two students dead.

    “After two students were horrifically murdered at Brown University when a shooter opened fire in a campus building, the department is initiating a review of Brown to determine if it has upheld its obligation under the law to vigilantly maintain campus security,” U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a Monday news release announcing the investigation. 

    The release also questioned whether Brown’s video surveillance system was “up to appropriate standards” and accused the university of being “unable to provide helpful information about the profile of the alleged assassin” in the aftermath of the shooting. 

    The suspected shooter, Claudio Manuel Neves Valente, a former Brown student, evaded capture and was found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound following a five-day manhunt. While some observers accused Brown of substandard security practices, which critics say delayed the capture of the suspected shooter, others allege the FBI bungled the search.

    ED is also probing whether Brown’s emergency notifications about the shooting were delayed.

    The department requested various records to aid in the investigation, including copies of annual security reports; crime logs; student and employee disciplinary referrals “related to the illegal possession, use, and/or distribution of weapons, drugs, or liquor”; and copies of all Brown policies and procedures, among other campus safety documents.

    The same day that ED announced the investigation into Brown, the private university in Rhode Island placed its top campus safety official, Rodney Chatman, on administrative leave as it reviews the shooting. Hugh T. Clements, the former chief of police of the Providence Police Department, will take on the top public safety job as Brown conducts a security assessment.

    Brown officials did not respond to a request for comment from Inside Higher Ed.

    Source link

  • Cancellation of mental health grants ruled unlawful

    Cancellation of mental health grants ruled unlawful

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    Dive Brief:

    • A federal judge on Friday ordered the permanent reinstatement of U.S. Department of Education mental health grants in 16 states, ruling that the April cancellation of the school-based and professional development funding was unlawful.
    • The order came a week after the Education Department awarded $208 million in new mental health grants under revised priorities set by the Trump administration that prohibit recipients from “promoting or endorsing gender ideology, political activism, racial stereotyping, or hostile environments for students of particular races.” 
    • The original multi-year grant program first became available in 2018 to help schools address a worsening youth mental health crisis and increased school violence, including by supporting partnerships with colleges to expand the number of mental health providers available to students. Court records in the case, which was filed by the 16 states covered in the ruling, described how the funding brought more mental health professionals into schools and improved school climates.

    Dive Insight:

    The Education Department in April discontinued already approved funding for the School-Based Mental Health Services Grant Program and the Mental Health Service Professional Demonstration Grant Program that had been approved in fiscal years 2022, 2023 and 2024, saying they conflicted with Trump administration’s priorities. 

    The new grant priorities announced in July limited funding to hiring school psychologists rather than also funding school counselors and social workers, who often also provide student mental health supports. 

    U.S. District Judge Kymberly Evanson, in the Dec. 19 order in State of Washington v. U.S. Department of Education, took the Education Department to task for politicizing the grant program. “Nothing in the existing regulatory scheme comports with the Department’s view that multi-year grants may be discontinued whenever the political will to do so arises,” the ruling said.

    The Education Department did not return a request for comment Monday.

    The canceled grants caused “significant disruption” to the 16 plaintiff states, according to the judge. Nationally, the Education Department said the canceled grants totaled about $1 billion, according to court records.

    Evanson found the Education Department had violated the Administrative Procedure Act multiple times through actions that “are arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law.”

    Specifically, the judge ruled that the department’s discontinuation notices to grantees in the 16 states that sued were “arbitrary and capricious” because they did not explain the reason for the cancellations. “The Department makes no effort to analogize the discontinuation notices or the process by which the notices were issued to the cases they cite,” Evanson said.

    The permanent injunction prevents the Education Department from issuing new priorities or irrelevant information to judge the mental health grant applications. Additionally, the court said it will oversee compliance with the order. In October, Evanson had issued an order granting the state’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

    The mental health grant programs began in 2018, after the school shooting at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, which killed 14 students and three staff members. The grants were continued and expanded over the years, including after the 2022 school shooting at Texas’ Robb Elementary School, where 19 students and two teachers were killed. 

    Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, who led the states’ lawsuit, said in a Dec. 20 statement the mental health grants helped schools hire 14,000 mental health professionals who provided mental and behavioral health services to nearly 775,000 K-12 students nationwide in the first year, helping to reduce wait times for students needing help.

    “We’re facing a youth mental health crisis,” Brown said in response to the latest court order. “Making sure our kids have proper support should never be subject to political whim. This is why we stand firm against this administration’s utter disregard for the law.”

    Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, in a Dec. 22 statement, said the ruling “ensures that our young people are not unlawfully denied resources, including mental health professionals in schools, to help them navigate a nationwide mental health epidemic.” Massachusetts was among the plaintiff states.

    Kelly Vaillancourt Strobach, director of policy and advocacy for the National Association of School Psychologists, said that NASP is “pleased to see that the grantees in these plaintiff states will be able to continue their work next year.”

    She added that grantees still have a lot of questions and that NASP “will be working with them to get answers to them in the new year about the future of their grant.”

    Myrna Mandlawitz, policy and legislative consultant for the Council of Administrators of Special Education, said the ruling could bode well for other plaintiffs suing the administration over canceled grants. “You can’t enforce against a grantee criteria that they didn’t know about when they applied for and received the grant. That doesn’t even pass the laugh test if you ask me,” Mandlawitz said.

    Joining Washington and Massachusetts in the lawsuit were the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.

    Source link

  • DHS final rule to overhaul H-1B visa in favour of higher earners

    DHS final rule to overhaul H-1B visa in favour of higher earners

    The final rule, released by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Tuesday is due to take effect on February 27, in time for the annual H-1B spring lottery. 

    It is currently under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and is set to be officially published on December 29.

    Alongside favouring “higher-skilled” and “higher-paid” workers, DHS said the change would “disincentivise abuse of the H-1B program to fill relatively lower-paid, lower-skilled positions, which is a significant problem under the present H-1B program”. 

    It is part of wider government efforts to ensure H-1B visas are issued to high earners, which saw the administration hiking the H-1B visa fee to $100,000 – a move it later clarified would not apply to F-1 students changing status within the US. 

    The drastic hike, which is up to 20 times more than what employers previously paid, has drawn three legal challenges, including one from the US Chamber of Commerce. 

    Today’s rule will come as little surprise to the sector after it was proposed in the Federal Register on September 24, with critics arguing that the change would constrain the US tech sector which they say would be moved to ramp up offshoring facilities and jobs.  

    53% of current international students say they would not have enrolled in the US if H-1B access was determined by wage levels

    NAFSA

    “There simply are not enough American computer science graduates to support the decades-long record of US innovation and economic growth. That is the wonder of the US tech sector,” Intead CEO Ben Waxman previously told The PIE. 

    “Why would the US government want to constrain that engine?” he asked.  

    What’s more, the change is likely to contribute to the declining appeal of the US among prospective international students who increasingly cite work experience and job opportunities as primary factors shaping study decisions.  

    In a recent NAFSA survey of current US international students, over half of respondents (53%) said they would not have enrolled in the first place if access to H-1B was determined by wage levels.  

    A similar proportion (54%) indicated they would never have enrolled in the US if it wasn’t for Optional Practical Training (OPT), which experts anticipate is also under threat

    The H-1B visa, popular with the likes of Amazon, Microsoft and Apple, enables US employers to temporarily employ international workers in “specialty occupations” across a wide range of industries such as healthcare, computer science and financial analysis.  

    Currently, there is an annual cap of 85,000 new H-1B visas, and when this cap is exceeded, applicants are placed into a random lottery which determines who is awarded a visa.  

    Under the new weighted system, higher earners will be entered into the selection pool more times than lower earners, ranging from one to four times.  

    Source link

  • Cost of DfE’s school insurance scheme to rise 7.4%

    Cost of DfE’s school insurance scheme to rise 7.4%

    Risk protection arrangement costs have risen by 61 per cent since 2020

    Risk protection arrangement costs have risen by 61 per cent since 2020


    The Department for Education has confirmed costs for its school insurance programme will rise again by 7.4 per cent this year, with the scheme now costing 60 per cent more than in 2020.

    The risk protection arrangement (RPA), first set up in 2014, provides state schools an alternative to commercial insurance.

    It covers risks such as material damage, personal accident and employers’ liability, with government covering the losses.

    Now, the DfE has confirmed the amount it charges will rise from £27 to £29 per pupil from April 2026. This 7.4 per cent increase is far above the current rate of inflation, around 3.5 per cent.

    It said costs were reviewed annually “to ensure breadth of cover and value for money are balanced”.

    While the DfE first charged £25 per pupil for schools in 2014, prices were lowered to £18 per pupil in 2019-20.

    Prices have since increased year on year, with a 61 per cent change from 2020 to 2026.

    Around 12,400 schools were signed up to the RPA in January 2025. The DfE opened the scheme to LA-maintained schools in 2020.

    It was originally launched to reduce the public cost of protecting academies against risk.

    While schools may join at any time of the year, multi-academy trusts can join in a phased manner, where some academies may still have commercial insurance contracts in place.

    The DfE has been approached for comment.

    Source link

  • Think you’re a news whiz? Take our news quiz

    Think you’re a news whiz? Take our news quiz

    You recall the big headlines in your news feed. But News Decoder took you to places that don’t get big spotlights. How well did you pay attention?

    Source link

  • Layoffs, Cuts and Closures Are Coming to LAUSD Schools As District Confronts Budget Shortfalls – The 74

    Layoffs, Cuts and Closures Are Coming to LAUSD Schools As District Confronts Budget Shortfalls – The 74


    Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

    Budget cuts, staffing reductions and school consolidations are coming to Los Angeles Unified as the cash-strapped district works to balance its shrinking budget, a top school official said. 

    LAUSD’s chief financial officer in an interview last week said declining enrollments and the end of pandemic relief funds have forced the district to take cost-cutting measures.  

    Schools have already been notified of how much they will have to cut from their budgets. The cuts will go into effect starting in August. 

    LAUSD officials in June had predicted a $1.6 billion deficit for the 2027-28 school year. But an updated version of the budget approved by the board last week eliminates the deficit by using reserve funds plus cost-cutting measures over the next two years. 

    The planned cuts to school budgets will begin in the 2026-27 school year, with school consolidations and staffing reductions planned for the following school year, said LAUSD Chief Financial Officer Saman Bravo-Karimi. 

    “We have fewer students each year, and in LAUSD that’s been the case for over two decades,” Bravo-Karimi said. “That has a profound impact on our funding levels. Also, we had the expiration of those one-time COVID relief funds that were very substantial.”  

    The district recently contracted with the consulting firm Ernst and Young to create models for closing and consolidating schools. While school officials wouldn’t say which schools or how many would be closed, the district has clearly been shrinking. 

    Enrollment last year fell to 408,083, from a peak of 746,831 in 2002. Nearly half of the district’s zoned elementary schools are half-full or less, and 56 have seen rosters fall by 70% or more. 

    Bravo-Karimi said in the current school year the district will spend about $2 billion more than it took in from state, local and federal funding. The trend of overspending is expected to continue next year and the year after that, he said.

    The district’s board in June approved a three-year budget plan that included a $18.8-billion budget for the current school year. The plan delayed layoffs until next year, and funded higher spending in part by reducing a fund for retirees’ health benefits. 

    According to the plan approved this month, the district will save:  

    • $425 million by clawing back funds that went unused by schools each year 
    • $300 million by reducing staffing and budgets at central offices 
    • $299 million by cutting special funding for schools with high-needs students
    • $120 million by cutting unfilled school staffing positions
    • $30 million by consolidating schools  
    • $16 million by cutting student transportation 

    Bravo-Karimi said the district gets virtually all of its money through per-pupil funding from the state. Since enrollment in the district has fallen steadily for decades, and then sharply since the pandemic, funding is down significantly, he said.

    Most zoned L.A. elementary schools are almost half empty, and many are operating at less than 25% capacity. Thirty-four schools have fewer than 200 students enrolled; a dozen of those schools once had enrollment over 400.     

    The drops have prompted LAUSD leaders to talk about closing or combining schools, a controversial step that other big U.S. cities are already doing or considering. 

    Bravo-Karimi said the district would assess the needs of communities and the conditions at local schools before it makes any decisions about school closings or consolidations. 

    “That process needs to play out before any decisions are made about potential consolidation of school facilities,” he said.

    Bravo-Karimi said other factors, including ongoing negotiations with labor unions, and changes to state funding, will further impact the district’s budget in the coming months. 

    Marguerite Roza, director of the Edunomics Lab and Research Professor at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy, said the cuts planned for LAUSD are “relatively mild” compared to overall size of the district’s budget and cuts being considered at other districts around California and the rest of the country. 

    “I don’t think the people in the schools are going to notice that there’s a shrinking of the central office or that they’re using reserves,” said Roza. “Unless you’re one of the people who loses their transportation or if you’re in one of the schools that gets closed.” 

    But, Roza said, many of the cuts taken by LAUSD can only be made once, and the district still faces profound changes as enrollments continue to fall and downsizing becomes more and more necessary. 

    “This really should be a signal to families,” said Roza of the planned cuts in the district’s latest budget. “After several years of really being flush with cash, this is not the financial position that LA Unified is going to be in moving forward.” 

    LAUSD Board Member Tanya Ortiz-Franklin, who represents LAUSD’s District Seven, which includes neighborhoods such as South L.A., Watts and San Pedro, said the district will work to shield kids from the impact of budget cuts. 

    But, Ortiz-Franklin said, the district hired permanent staffers with one-time COVID funding, and now some of those staffers will have to be let go. 

    Still, LA Unified has made strong gains since the pandemic, she said, and the district must work hard to preserve its upward trajectory despite financial headwinds. 

    “We would love to share good news, especially this time of year,” said Ortiz-Franklin. “But the reality is, it is really tough.” 

    School leaders across LAUSD received preliminary budgets for the next year over the last few weeks, said Ortiz-Franklin. Some schools in her district are facing cuts of up to 15%, forcing them to make tough decisions on which staffers to keep and who to let go. 

    Several hundred additional layoffs will be announced in February, she said, when the district makes another assessment of staffing needs. 

    “We don’t know the total number yet, and we don’t know which positions yet,” said Ortiz-Franklin.


    Did you use this article in your work?

    We’d love to hear how The 74’s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers. Tell us how

    Source link

  • Meet the founder… Bhakti Shah, The Outreach Collective

    Meet the founder… Bhakti Shah, The Outreach Collective

    Describe your company in three words or phrases.

    Explore, exchange, and evolve.

    What inspired you to start the company? Was there a particular moment that sparked the idea?

    After 18 years in the industry, I witnessed a fundamental disconnect across India’s education ecosystem. Schools, universities, counsellors, and solution providers were all shaping student outcomes, yet operating in complete silos — no coordination, no meaningful dialogue, no shared professional infrastructure.

    I was working as an outreach professional with a university at the time. That year alone, we managed 350 school fairs. My team was stretched impossibly thin – working weekends, holidays, special occasions – simply because schools and universities weren’t communicating. The inefficiency was staggering, but the real issue was deeper: there was no equitable space where these stakeholders could engage as equals and build collective capacity.

    TOC emerged to fill that void. What started as a WhatsApp group of 40 people grew to 1,000 within three months. That validated everything: the need wasn’t just real — it was urgent and market-wide.

    How would you describe your company’s mission in one sentence?

    TOC is a Global South–first professional development association building structured learning and networking infrastructure for the education ecosystem.

    How would your team describe you as a leader?

    I hold high standards, I am demanding, but with clear purpose. TOC operates as a not-for-profit with largely volunteer-driven efforts and one full-time employee, which requires a fundamentally different leadership approach.

    But let me be direct: volunteering isn’t a favour, and it doesn’t mean reduced accountability. When you commit to a volunteer role, hundreds of members depend on that work being executed well and on time. I expect basic professional courtesies — respecting timelines, honoring commitments, delivering what you have promised.

    My team would say I expect excellence because the work genuinely matters. Leadership here is about mutual respect, shared accountability, and recognising that impact doesn’t require a paycheck to be real.

    What’s one misconception about your sector you’d love to correct?

    That university enrolments depend entirely on schools. It’s both unfair and strategically flawed. Universities treating schools as transactional feeders is neither scalable nor sustainable as it creates unrealistic pressure on schools while preventing universities from building diversified recruitment strategies. The ecosystem needs to move beyond this outdated model and embrace multiple pathways to students. The sooner institutions recognise this, the stronger everyone becomes.

    What keeps you energised outside of work?

    Two things. First, food — I’m a khansama at heart. If I weren’t building TOC, I’d be running a kitchen. I specialize in Mughlai, Awadhi, and other regional Indian cuisines, and I am equally passionate about baking. Cooking isn’t a hobby for me; it’s how I think, create, and process.

    Second, impact stories. When diverse stakeholders connect in our spaces and say, “We would never have met if it wasn’t for TOC” — that’s everything. Those moments of connection and the transformation they catalyse keep me going. It’s proof that the infrastructure we’re building actually works.

    What advice would you give another founder entering the international education space?

    Fundamentally rethink how you approach sales. Everyone is selling something — universities, companies, consultants — but the conversation transforms when you position yourself as solving a problem rather than pushing a product. Don’t lead with what you offer; lead with the challenge you’re addressing and the measurable value you create.

    In education especially, thought leadership isn’t optional — it’s foundational infrastructure. If you’re only selling without building intellectual credibility, contributing meaningfully to discourse, and adding genuine value, you won’t build sustainable growth. Sales without substance is dead on arrival.

    What initiatives are you rolling out in the near future?

    We’re launching Initiate by TOC, a new entity structured around three verticals: research, learning, and experiences.

    Under research, we’re partnering with Ashoka University to publish Pre-College Skills Audit in India 2026 — India’s first multi-stakeholder examination of skills readiness. The study begins in January with findings released in May.

    The experiences vertical launches with the Sakura Immersion Program in partnership with Acumen – a first-of-its-kind Japan-focused professional development experience for independent counsellors across Kyoto, Osaka, and Tokyo.

    In learning, we’ve partnered with Symbiosis Centre for Distance Learning to offer a three-month Certificate in Career and College Guidance — formal credentialing for counselling professionals.

    If you could accomplish one big thing in the next year, what would it be?

    Building scalable, credential-worthy learning infrastructure that professionalizes the entire education ecosystem — counsellors, university representatives, service providers, and school leaders. This sector has operated on informal knowledge transfer and relationship-based learning for far too long.

    If we can create formal pathways for continuous professional development – where expertise is recognised through credentials, learning is structured and ongoing, and professional growth is accessible across the Global South – we fundamentally elevate how the ecosystem functions. Better-equipped professionals create better student outcomes, stronger institutional partnerships, and more effective solution delivery.

    That’s not incremental change, that’s the multiplier effect that transforms an entire industry.

    Source link

  • Effectively Countering Blame Displacement | Tech & Learning

    Effectively Countering Blame Displacement | Tech & Learning

    As educators, we frequently encounter challenging situations, often involving aggressive or defensive responses that feel like a verbal assault.

    I learned this firsthand as a new administrator when a student was seated in the office for detention and another child walked up, knocked on the window, and made fun of him. I redirected the heckler, and later that night I was stunned at what happened: the parent of the heckler wrote a letter to the superintendent, complaining that I had verbally assaulted his son and demanded I be fired; I was clearly unfit to work with children.

    Source link

  • From Promise to Precarity — What’s New in 2026

    From Promise to Precarity — What’s New in 2026

    When HEI published “Guild Education: Enablers of Anti‑Union Corporations and Subprime College Programs” in April 2021, the piece raised serious concerns about Guild’s business model, its corporate clients, and the value of its touted “education as a benefit” for working-class employees. That early reporting highlighted the risk that Guild’s platform — while appearing to offer opportunity — might deliver little meaningful upward mobility while embedding workers more deeply in corporate control.

    Almost five years later, the unfolding story of Guild reveals a deeper crisis: repeated layoffs, leadership instability, and employee dissatisfaction have compounded internal challenges, creating a disconnect between the company’s outward mission and the lived realities of its workforce.

    In 2021, HEI documented Guild’s extensive client network, which included major employers such as Walmart, Lowe’s, and Chipotle. Its partnerships with both for-profit and nonprofit education providers raised questions about the quality of credentials and long-term outcomes. HEI noted that only a small percentage of eligible employees at these companies accessed Guild’s tuition benefits, highlighting limits in the platform’s reach. At the time, Guild was framed as part of a broader “robocollege” ecosystem, where corporate-sponsored online programs risked low completion rates and limited returns for learners.

    The subsequent years have underscored these concerns. After a reported peak valuation of $4.4 billion in 2022, Guild’s value declined sharply by 2024, with secondary market activity placing it around $1.3 billion. The company experienced multiple rounds of layoffs, including a 25 percent workforce reduction in May 2024, adding to prior cuts and heightening employee insecurity. Under new leadership following the departure of founder CEO Rachel Romer Carlson, Guild pivoted strategically, rebranding itself from “Guild Education” to simply “Guild” and acquiring Nomadic Learning to expand its corporate learning offerings.

    While the company reports significant growth metrics — including expanded access to nearly 500,000 new employees and over $1 billion saved in tuition — employee reviews reveal a starkly different internal reality. Former and current staff describe high stress, frequent goal-post shifts, and a demoralizing culture marked by favoritism and inequity. Coaching, once central to Guild’s mission, is now characterized by rigid metrics, performance improvement plans, and limited room for meaningful mentorship. Burnout, extended medical leaves, and frustration with stalled internal mobility are widespread. Many employees report that the company’s original social justice mission has been hollowed out in practice, leaving staff disconnected from the work they once found meaningful.

    Guild’s pivot toward corporate learning reflects broader trends in workforce development, skills-based hiring, and talent management. While the shift may offer employers measurable returns in retention and internal mobility, it also signals a departure from the promise of genuine educational uplift. For employees drawn to Guild for its original mission, the change raises questions about whose needs are being prioritized and at what cost.

    The story of Guild underscores several pressing concerns. Credibility gaps between marketing and internal realities leave workers vulnerable to exploitation. Corporate priorities have overtaken educational mission, demonstrating how profit motives can override commitments to social equity. The devaluation of coaching and credentials as meaningful education risks normalizing lower-quality programs tied primarily to employer needs. For other corporate-sponsored education and edtech ventures, Guild’s trajectory offers a cautionary tale: scaling and investor demands can quickly erode mission and employee well-being.

    Guild’s rise was once seen as a model of opportunity creation for working adults, but the experiences of its employees reveal the fragility of that promise. By 2025, the company is less a beacon of social mobility than a case study in what can happen when education becomes a tool for corporate talent management. For readers committed to equity, accountability, and lifelong learning, Guild’s story serves as a warning: marketing and good intentions are insufficient protections when leadership and corporate priorities fail.


    Sources

    Source link

  • Final Exam: Test yourself on the past year’s K-12 news

    Final Exam: Test yourself on the past year’s K-12 news

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    How well did you keep up with this year’s developments in K-12 education? To find out, take our 10-question quiz below. Then, share your score by tagging us on social media with #K12DivePopQuiz.

    Source link