Tag: arrested

  • Pro-Palestinian Protesters Arrested at Columbia, UW, Beyond

    Pro-Palestinian Protesters Arrested at Columbia, UW, Beyond

    About 80 pro-Palestinian protesters were arrested at Columbia University Wednesday as they occupied a reading room in the campus’s library, The New York Times and other sources reported.

    The arrests come just over a year after protesters at Columbia occupied Hamilton Hall, an academic building, as part of a massive protest movement that inspired other student demonstrations nationwide but drew ire from Republicans and pro-Israel groups, who argued that the protesters’ chants and signs were antisemitic.

    Columbia isn’t the only campus where protesters are seeking to revitalize the movement as the spring semester winds down. Though their numbers are nowhere near the hundreds that erupted last spring, pro-Palestinian protests have sprung up on several campuses in recent weeks—in some cases honoring the anniversary of last year’s demonstrations or calling for charges against student demonstrators to be dropped.

    “In light of all of the repression that the student movement for Palestine faced in the wake of the encampment last year, it’s important for us to insist on our demands, which have not changed,” a spokesperson for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine told The News & Observer regarding a daylong demonstration held at the end of April.

    Ultimately, it seems that most protesters are asking for the same thing they demanded a year ago: for their institutions to divest from companies with ties to Israel. Only an extremely small number of colleges has done so, but that hasn’t deterred students from trying.

    The protests also come amid President Donald Trump’s ongoing attacks on institutions that he believes failed to protect Jewish students during last year’s demonstrations. So far, his administration has frozen billions in federal funding to Columbia and other institutions, and taken steps to deport international students who participated in the protests.

    UW and Columbia

    Columbia students weren’t alone in taking over a campus building in recent weeks. About 75 protesters at the University of Washington occupied a new engineering building, barricading the doors and starting fires in nearby dumpsters Monday night, The Seattle Times reported. The organizers, part of a group called Students United for Palestinian Equality and Return UW, told the paper they wanted to “repurpose a building that is meant to make weapons of war to a place that serves the needs of students and workers and staff at the University of Washington.”

    Three law enforcement agencies were called in to disband the protest; 31 people were arrested.

    Administrators at both Columbia and UW have issued statements condemning the protests on their respective campuses. UW president Ana Mari Cauce called the demonstration “dangerous, violent and illegal building occupation and related vandalism.” She condemned statements by the group celebrating Hamas’s deadly Oct. 7 attack on Israeli civilians, saying the institution would “continue our actions to oppose antisemitism, racism and all forms of biases.”

    In a lengthy message to the Columbia campus, Claire Shipman, the recently installed acting president, called the Wednesday protest “utterly unacceptable.”

    “Let me be clear: Columbia unequivocally rejects antisemitism and all other forms of harassment and discrimination. And we certainly reject a group of students—and we don’t yet know whether there were outsiders involved—closing down a library in the middle of the week before finals and forcing 900 students out of their study spaces, many leaving belongings behind. Our commitment to a safe, inclusive, and respectful campus community is unshakeable, and we will continue to act decisively to uphold these values,” she wrote.

    Both presidents said they attempted to resolve the situation peacefully before sending in police.

    Shipman’s statement earned her the praise from members of the Trump administration’s Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism, who said in a statement that they are “confident that Columbia will take the appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved in this act.”

    At the same time, the same task force announced it would launch a review of the protest at UW.

    “The Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism appreciates the university’s strong statement condemning last night’s violence and applauds the quick action by law enforcement officers to remove violent criminals from the university campus,” the task force said in a press release. “While these are good first steps, the university must do more to deter future violence and guarantee that Jewish students have a safe and productive learning environment. The Task Force expects the institution to follow up with enforcement actions and policy changes that are clearly necessary to prevent these uprisings moving forward.”

    Arrests Elsewhere

    In recent weeks, pro-Palestinian protesters have also been arrested at Swarthmore College, Rutgers University, Virginia Commonwealth University and the University of California, Los Angeles.

    At Swarthmore, protesters erected an encampment on Trotter Lawn, a central campus green, on April 30, demanding divestment and the protection of students from the Trump administration. The university began issuing interim suspensions the next day. On May 3, police were called in to tear down the encampment, according to a statement by college president Val Smith. Police arrested nine individuals, including one current and one former student.

    The Rutgers protest, held on April 29, was arranged to oppose an appearance by U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, an Israel supporter who participated in a roundtable on antisemitism at the university’s Hillel. Though they were protesting in a designated area near the Hillel, four individuals—three of them Rutgers students—were charged with rioting after they stepped out of the area, blocking a public sidewalk, according to MyCentralJersey.com.

    At VCU, one person was arrested April 29 during a gathering to commemorate a clash between protesters and police on campus the previous year. A student organizer with the campus’s Students for Justice in Palestine chapter said the event was not a protest. However, university police said it violated a policy that requires authorization for events where students hold signs or banners, The Progress-Index reported. Police asked the students to disperse and arrested one individual who held up a sign chastising police for pepper-spraying protesters last April.

    At UCLA, three individuals were arrested at an on-campus showing of The Encampments, a documentary on the pro-Palestinian encampments of spring 2024. According to the university, the event, which drew about 150 guests, was unauthorized because it was hosted by the campus’s SJP chapter, which was suspended in February. The university indicated that the three individuals were arrested for assaulting a police officer and assaulting and robbing a student.

    ‘Scared to Talk About It’

    Despite the recent increase in protests, the Trump administration’s actions—as well as the penalties levied on student protesters by many institutions over the past year—seem to have quieted some planned demonstrations this spring.

    Emory University was home to an explosive clash between protesters and police on April 25, 2024, which led to 28 arrests. But this year, according to The Emory Wheel, Emory’s student newspaper, only about 50 people showed up to an event commemorating that day.

    One faculty demonstrator told the Wheel that many students no longer felt comfortable protesting.

    “It’s clear that there’s just a lot of people who are afraid,” he said. “You don’t have to actually arrest people sometimes to suppress freedom of speech.”

    Student protesters at the University of Texas at Austin, the site of over 130 arrests in April 2024, expressed a similar sentiment during a protest marking the anniversary of those arrests. About 100 people showed up, according to the university’s student paper.

    “You don’t hear near as many people talking about the genocide that’s going on, even here at UT,” a student told The Daily Texan. “With the 100-plus arrests that [law enforcement] made, people are almost scared to talk about it or to do anything about it.”

    Source link

  • Barnard protesters arrested after refusing to evacuate library

    Barnard protesters arrested after refusing to evacuate library

    Student protesters at Barnard College were arrested Wednesday afternoon for refusing to leave the campus’s library when asked by police, who were clearing the building due to a bomb threat, The New York Times reported. The students were protesting the recent expulsions of three student demonstrators.

    Protesters gathered for a sit-in in the Milstein Center at around 1 p.m. Wednesday. Several hours later, administrators shared that they had received a bomb threat, and police began evacuating the building. The New York Police Department posted on social media that “anyone who refuses to leave the location is subject to arrest.” (The bomb threat was later found to be false.)

    Many students initially refused to leave, continuing to chant above the sound of a fire alarm, until police began pushing students out of the building. Eventually, nine students were taken into custody for resisting police.

    Columbia University Apartheid Divest, a pro-Palestinian activist group, as well as the college’s student government, condemned Barnard’s leaders for calling on NYPD officers to remove students from the building.

    “Barnard College has broken a long-standing promise. SGA has been explicitly told by President [Laura] Rosenbury, in the presence of other senior staff, that the College would never invite the NYPD onto campus,” student government members wrote in an email to the Barnard community. “To go against this commitment blatantly violates a precedent that was meant to protect our students.”

    Rosenbury defended the decision to bring NYPD officers to campus, saying it was necessary to protect protesters from injury after they refused to follow staff members’ instructions to leave the Milstein Center. (Copies of both the SGA’s and Rosenbury’s emails were shared in an article by Bwog, an independent student newspaper at Columbia.)

    “For the safety of our entire community—including the safety of the masked disrupters—Barnard made the necessary decision to request NYPD assistance so they could evacuate the building to reduce the risk of harm … The decision to request NYPD assistance was guided and informed entirely by the absolute obligation we have to keep every member of our community safe,” Rosenbury said via email.

    Source link

  • Quran burner assassinated in Sweden — and another arrested in the UK

    Quran burner assassinated in Sweden — and another arrested in the UK

    Last year, FIRE launched the Free Speech Dispatch, a regular series covering new and continuing censorship trends and challenges around the world. Our goal is to help readers better understand the global context of free expression. Want to make sure you don’t miss an update? Sign up for our newsletter

    Blasphemers face arrest, the death penalty, and assassination

    (Jay Janner / Austin American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK)
    • Iraqi refugee Salwan Momika, known for his well-publicized and controversial public Quran burnings, was assassinated on Jan. 29 in Sweden. Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson suggested “there is obviously a risk that there is also a link to foreign power” involved. Days later, a Swedish court fined and issued a suspended sentence to Salwan Najem, another Iraqi refugee who burned Qurans with Momika, who was convicted of incitement against an ethnic group. The similar charges against Momika were dropped in light of his killing.
    • Greater Manchester Police arrested a man “on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence” for publicly burning a Quran and livestreaming the act in the UK. An assistant chief constable said police “made a swift arrest at the time and recognise the right people have for freedom of expression, but when this crosses into intimidation to cause harm or distress we will always look to take action when it is reported to us.” The arrest took place just two days after Momika was assassinated in Sweden.
    • Labour Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner will establish a council to create a government definition of “Islamophobia.” Depending on the council’s definition, and how it will or will not be implemented by government agencies responding to Islamophobia, it could implicate UK citizens’ ability to speak freely about important religious matters. 
    • Six men were sentenced to death for blasphemy in Pakistani courts late last month. All had been accused of posting blasphemous content on the internet.
    • Delhi police are investigating Washington Post columnist Rana Ayyub for social media posts sharing “anti-India sentiment” and insulting Hindu deities.
    • Iranian rapper Amir Hossein Maghsoudloo, known by Tataloo, was reportedly sentenced to death for blasphemy. He had previously been extradited from Turkey and sentenced to five years in prison before his case was reopened.

    Comedy and art crackdown in India

    Crowd of people carrying Hindu God Ganesha for immersion in water bodies during a festival

    Crowd of people carrying the Hindu God Ganesha for immersion in bodies of water during a festival in Amravati, Maharashtra, India, on Sept. 27, 2018 (Dipak Shelare / Shutterstock.com)

    In late January, a Delhi court gave the green light for police to seize two paintings by famous artist MF Husain from the Delhi Art Gallery. A complaint against the paintings, which “depicted Hindu gods Ganesha and Hanuman alongside nude female figures,” alleged they “hurt religious sentiments.” (Around the same time, local police in Texas also seized paintings. Fort Worth police entered the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth and took four decades-old photos from artist Sally Mann’s Diaries of Home installation showing her children nude. FIRE, the National Coalition Against Censorship, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas demanded an end to the censorship this week.)

    FIRE demands Fort Worth police return artwork confiscated from museum

    Press Release

    Government agents storming into a museum and taking down art isn’t the sort of thing that’s supposed to happen in America. But that’s exactly what happened in Fort Worth, Texas.


    Read More

    An even bigger media censorship controversy has bloomed since. In a recent episode of the YouTube show India’s Got Latent, comedian Ranveer Allahbadia joked, “Would you watch your parents have sex every day, or join in once and stop it forever?” To put it mildly, this did not go over well.

    In the days following the controversy, numerous censorship threats emerged. Mumbai police have summoned panelists on the show, and they may be facing numerous charges related to obscenity and insult. MP Naresh Mhaske called for greater regulation of online speech, and the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology is reportedly “considering recommending that the laws around digital content be made stricter.” YouTube has acted, too, taking down the video after receiving a notice from the Information and Broadcasting Ministry.

    This joke may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s a good example of how efforts to crack down on one incident of unpopular speech can balloon into a much greater censorship threat.

    New laws governing speech from Israel to Pakistan to Australia

    National flags of Pakistan and Israel

    • Late last month, Israel’s Knesset passed a law criminalizing denial of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel “with the intention of defending the terrorist organization Hamas and its partners, expressing sympathy for them, or identifying with them.” Offenders will be sentenced to five years in prison. The bill is modeled after legislation criminalizing Holocaust denial.
    • Pakistan’s new law governing online disinformation will punish intentional dissemination of material speakers have “reason to believe to be false or fake and likely to cause or create a sense of fear, panic or disorder or unrest.” Journalists protested the law, which will punish offenders with up to three years in prison.
    • Australia introduced mandatory minimum sentencing for some violent hate offenses, but also for the use of hate symbols or displays, like a Nazi salute. The Law Council of Australia objected to the changes, noting that “a person guilty of public display of prohibited symbols at a political protest would be subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 12 months imprisonment.”
    • Germany’s ban on “symbols of anti-constitutional organizations” is not new, but it certainly caught global attention last month. Police announced they were investigating protest groups’ projection onto a Tesla Gigafactory of the word “Heil” and an image of Elon Musk’s repeated gesture at President Trump’s inauguration rally, which police suggest violates the country’s ban on the Nazi salute.

    Sorry, DeepSeek can’t talk about that

    Smartphone displaying the Deepseek logo with the Chinese flag in the background

    A smartphone displaying the Deepseek logo with the Chinese flag in the background (Rokas Tenys / Shutterstock.com)

    AI company DeepSeek joins the list of Chinese tools and apps gaining a greater global footprint — but its users have discovered there are many things DeepSeek won’t say. As we’ve covered in previous Dispatch entries, tech developed by or with Chinese companies tends to come with some serious speech restrictions, and DeepSeek is no different. When asked some common sensitive questions about Chinese politics and history, DeepSeek offers this result: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.” Sometimes users can even see the program produce an answer before deleting it. It will, however, answer similarly sensitive questions about other countries’ histories.

    A busy few weeks of charges and sentencings

    • A Thai man already serving a record 50 years in prison on lese-majeste charges received yet another long sentence for insulting the monarchy in social media posts, bringing him to at least 59 years. Meanwhile, another activist received a two-year term on similar charges as well as Computer Crime Act violations for live-streaming from a protest.
    • Malaysia is targeting its royal critics, too. A 42-year-old man must pay a fine or serve a six-month sentence after being found guilty of posting “offensive and insulting” Instagram content about the monarchy.

    From the UK to Germany to Singapore: Police are watching what you post

    Blog

    Police detained a pro-Palestinian activist in London under the UK’s Terrorism Act for, as the arresting officer put it, “making a hate speech.”


    Read More

    • A Shanghai court sentenced documentary filmmaker Chen Pinlin to three and a half years for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” a charge commonly used against critics of the Chinese government. Chen had released a documentary about the country’s 2022 “White Paper” protests.
    • Police in India are investigating claims filed against politician Rahul Gandhi for “acts jeopardising India’s sovereignty, unity and integrity.” Gandhi accused the country’s BJP party of capturing all state institutions and said he was fighting against “the Indian state itself.”
    • Moroccan activist Said Ait Mahdi was fined and sentenced to three months in prison on charges including defamation for leading protests criticizing the government’s response to a deadly 2023 earthquake.
    • Turkish authorities are in the midst of yet another crackdown on civil society, with dozens of journalists, lawyers, and politicians investigated, arrested, or brought in for questioning by authorities in recent weeks.  
    • Kazakh authorities arrested blogger and satirist Temirlan Ensebek for “inciting interethnic discord” in an old online post — but won’t say which one.
    • The band Placebo’s Brian Molko has been charged with defamation for “contempt of the institutions” in Italy after calling Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni a “piece of shit, fascist, racist” during a 2023 music festival.

    Non-Crime Hate Incidents…in the U.S.? 

    Yellow Tape Showing Text "Police Line Do Not Cross" with police flashers in background

    The Free Beacon released a report late last month about “Bias Response Hotlines” popping up in cities and states across the United States — and these hotlines share some similarities with the UK’s controversial treatment of “non-crime hate incidents” (NCHIs). 

    In Maryland, for example, the attorney general’s office states on its website that “people who engage in bias incidents may eventually escalate into criminal behavior,” so “Maryland law enforcement agencies are required by law to record and report data on both hate crimes and bias incidents.” And in Philadelphia, authorities handling “hate incidents” can ask for identifying details, including exact addresses and names of the alleged offenders, and officials will in some cases “contact those accused of bias and request that they attend sensitivity training.”

    Readers of the Dispatch may recognize some overlap with the UK’s problematic NCHI system, where police create records of NCHIs based on complaints from members of the public accusing individuals, who are often not informed, of legal but hateful acts. The NCHI system is extensive, and it caught global attention late last year when Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson reported being visited by Essex Police for a year-old X post. Multiple police departments handled the case, and at least one flagged it as an NCHI. 

    For more about this and other recent debates about free speech in Europe, see my piece  from earlier this week on a 60 Minutes story detailing Germany’s speech policing and Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference.

    Women’s rights activist facing long jail term released in Saudi Arabia

    A still image of Salma al-Shehab from an interview she gave in 2014 at the Riyadh International Book Fair

    A still image of Salma al-Shehab from an interview she gave in 2014 at the Riyadh International Book Fair. (YouTube.com / Abdul Rahman Al-Saad)

    Let’s finish off with some good news. Salma al-Shehab, a 36-year-old mother of two and doctoral student at Leeds University, has been released from prison after more than four years, of which almost nine months were spent in solitary confinement. Al-Shehab’s ordeal reached a nadir in 2022 when an appeals court sentenced her to a shocking 34 years in prison for posting in support of women’s rights on social media. She used the internet to “cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security,” among other alleged crimes. 

    There are still some reasons to be concerned, however. Al-Shehab may still be restricted by a travel ban, and many unjustly imprisoned activists remain behind bars in Saudi Arabia.

    Source link