Tag: Campus

  • Designed with purpose: Why campus restrooms should reflect the school behind them

    Designed with purpose: Why campus restrooms should reflect the school behind them

    Restrooms don’t have to be showpieces — but they also shouldn’t be an afterthought.

    Across campuses, every space tells a story. The student center. The admissions office. The lecture hall. Each one reflects the institution’s priorities, personality and pride. But too often, the restroom is left out of that story — treated as a utility rather than a touchpoint.

    That’s starting to change.

    Forward-thinking colleges and universities are reimagining what restrooms can contribute to the campus experience. Whether they blend quietly into the background or become a branded statement — they’re being designed with intention.

    To reinforce school spirit. To align with campus standards. To simplify operations across varied facilities. And most of all, to support a seamless experience for students, staff and guests.

    Because the restroom may not be the centerpiece of campus life — but it still reflects the care behind it.

    A Daily Experience That Deserves Design

    Restrooms are among the most frequently visited and most visibly judged spaces on campus by prospective students, visiting families, faculty, alumni, donors and staff. Their condition, look and functionality can either reinforce the university’s values…or quietly undermine them.

    In fact, nearly 60% of people say a poorly maintained restroom negatively affects their perception of an organization.¹ And while universities don’t compete on toilet paper, they do compete on experience, reputation and pride.

    That makes restrooms more than a maintenance checklist — they’re part of the brand.

    One Standard. Many Spaces.

    From dorms to arenas to academic halls, no two campus buildings are exactly alike. But consistency still matters for both the brand and the teams behind it.

    A welcome center might feature subtle brand cues or custom faceplates. A student union might highlight school spirit or student accomplishments. An admin wing may favor quieter design that blends in. The point isn’t sameness; it’s cohesion.

    So how do universities achieve that without adding complexity?

    They’re working from a flexible foundation — systems that adapt to each building’s needs while maintaining a cohesive experience across campus.

    That might mean:

    • High-capacity towel systems in athletic centers to reduce servicing during peak hours
    • Touchless, ADA-compliant dispensers in classrooms and libraries to support accessibility
    • Customizable faceplates in front-facing spaces to reflect branding or student life
    • Smart technology that tracks supply levels and helps janitorial staff focus where it’s needed most

    By choosing tools that support both visual customization and operational ease, campuses are creating restrooms that feel thoughtful, consistent and easy to maintain — no matter the setting.

    It’s not one-size-fits-all. It’s one strategy applied intentionally.

    Built to Work — and Work Hard

    Restrooms can look great — but if they’re hard to service, the system breaks down fast. On a busy campus with lean facility teams, every efficiency matters.

    Elevated doesn’t mean complex. In fact, the best elevated solutions simplify operations with:

    • Refill systems designed to reduce changeouts and user error
    • Configurations that match space and capacity without overloading custodial teams
    • Smart restroom monitoring that helps direct staff where they’re needed most
    • Soft-close and touchless features that create quieter, more seamless experiences

    The result: less downtime, fewer complaints, smoother campus operations. And all of it happening behind the scenes — just as it should.

    A restroom shouldn’t steal the spotlight. But it should reflect your standards.

    Whether you’re reimagining a flagship student space or refreshing legacy buildings, intentional restroom design can help bring your brand and your operations into better alignment — and create a more consistent experience, one space at a time. 

    Because small details send big signals — to students, staff and everyone who walks your halls.

    Explore what elevated could look like for your campus.


    Sources:

    1Bradley Corporation. (2023, February 28). Bradley survey illustrates why clean restrooms are good for business. https://www.bradleycorp.com/news/bradley-survey-illustrates-why-clean-restrooms-are-good-for-business

    Source link

  • University funding tied to antisemitism action – Campus Review

    University funding tied to antisemitism action – Campus Review

    Universities could be subject to a ’report card’ that assesses their responses to antisemitism, which could result in cut funding, according to Australia’s antisemitism envoy’s report released on Thursday.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • Graeme Turner’s ‘broken’ universities – Campus Review

    Graeme Turner’s ‘broken’ universities – Campus Review

    AnalysisCommentary

    Graeme Turner’s new book on the sector surveys the wreckage and offers some solutions

    The Australian university sector has come under considerable pressure in recent years. It is currently in a parlous state.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • What is an achievement wallet? – Campus Review

    What is an achievement wallet? – Campus Review

    Sarah DeMark is vice-president of workforce intelligence and credential integrity at Western Governors University; an online, Utah-based institution.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • Addressing workforce challenges in higher education – Campus Review

    Addressing workforce challenges in higher education – Campus Review

    How empowering academic and administrative staff with HR tech drives employee engagement and retention

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • New Congressional Bill Targets College Sports Funding, Could Impact Campus Diversity Programs

    New Congressional Bill Targets College Sports Funding, Could Impact Campus Diversity Programs

    A bipartisan House bill introduced last Thursday aims to reshape college athletics by limiting how universities can fund sports programs while offering the NCAA limited antitrust protections—changes that could significantly affect institutional priorities and student access.

    The SCORE Act, backed by seven Republicans and two Democrats, faces uncertain prospects despite bipartisan support. While the House appears receptive, the bill would require at least seven Democratic votes in the Senate, where passage remains unlikely.

    The legislation addresses three key NCAA priorities: antitrust protections, federal preemption of state name-image-likeness (NIL) laws, and provisions preventing student-athletes from becoming university employees. These changes come as colleges navigate the fallout from a $2.78 billion settlement requiring institutions to compensate athletes directly.

    The bill’s prohibition on using student fees to support athletics could force difficult budget decisions at universities nationwide. This restriction strikes at proposed funding mechanisms as schools scramble to find up to $20.5 million annually for athlete compensation.

    Several institutions have already announced fee increases that would be affected. Clemson University implemented a $150 per-semester “athletic fee” this fall, while Fresno State approved $495 in additional yearly fees, with half designated for athletics. Such fees disproportionately impact students from lower-income backgrounds who already face rising educational costs.

    The financial pressures extend beyond student fees. Tennessee has introduced “talent fees” for season-ticket holders, Arkansas has raised concession prices, and numerous schools are seeking increased booster contributions—all reflecting the growing financial demands of competitive athletics.

    The legislation includes provisions aimed at protecting Olympic sports programs, which some fear could be eliminated as resources shift toward revenue-generating football and basketball. Schools with coaches earning over $250,000 would be required to offer at least 16 sports programs, mirroring existing NCAA Division I FBS requirements.

    This mandate could help preserve opportunities for student-athletes in traditionally underrepresented sports, many of which provide crucial scholarship pathways for diverse student populations. However, critics question whether this protection is sufficient given the magnitude of financial pressures facing athletic departments.

    The bill’s broader implications for Title IX compliance and gender equity in athletics remain unclear, as institutions balance new athlete compensation requirements with existing obligations to provide equal opportunities for male and female student-athletes.

     

    Source link

  • Missouri governor signs legislation securing students’ rights to freely associate on campus

    Missouri governor signs legislation securing students’ rights to freely associate on campus

    Missouri has passed a law protecting the right of students to gather and speak on campuses across the state. On Wednesday, Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe signed into law SB 160, which defends the freedom of student organizations to set leadership and membership requirements that are consistent with their beliefs. 

    Although the bill was later amended to include provisions unrelated to the student organization protections for which we advocated, the final law still marks a meaningful victory for students at Missouri’s public colleges and universities.

    The First Amendment guarantees the right to freely associate with others who share their beliefs — or not associate with those who don’t. FIRE has consistently opposed policies that force student groups to eliminate belief-based membership rules to gain official college recognition. As we said in March when Utah signed similar protections into law, it makes little sense, for example, “to force a Muslim student group to let atheists become voting members or for an environmentalist student group that raises awareness about the threats of climate change to allow climate change skeptics to hold office.”

    In a letter to Missouri’s legislature supporting SB 160, we explained that the right to associate freely extends to students at public universities and to the student organizations they form. The Supreme Court agrees, and has repeatedly upheld this principle, affirming in Healy v. James that public colleges cannot deny official recognition to student organizations solely based on their beliefs or associations. Similarly, in Widmar v. Vincent, the Court ruled that a public university violated the First Amendment by denying a religious student group access to campus facilities because of its religious beliefs.

    However, the Court’s decision in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez upheld the constitutionality of “all-comers” policies — requiring student organizations to accept any student as a member or leader, even those who oppose the group’s core beliefs. But the ruling applies only when such policies are enforced uniformly. In practice, universities often apply these policies selectively. For example, some religious organizations have been forced to accept members and leaders who do not share their faith, while secular groups have been allowed to set their own membership and leadership requirements without administrative intervention. 

    This selective enforcement results in viewpoint discrimination. SB 160 is meant to correct that imbalance. It states that schools cannot take any action against a student association or potential student association:

    (a) Because such association is political, ideological, or religious; 

    (b) On the basis of such association’s viewpoint or expression of the viewpoint by the association or the association’s members; or

    (c) Based on such association’s requirement that the association’s leaders be committed to furthering the association’s mission or that the association’s leaders adhere to the association’s sincerely held beliefs, practice requirements, or standards of conduct.

    With the enactment of this bill, Missouri joins a growing number of states strengthening protections for the First Amendment rights of student organizations on campus. 

    FIRE thanks Missouri lawmakers and Gov. Kehoe for affirming that students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the campus gates.

    Source link

  • The four forces redefining connected digital experiences in higher education – Campus Review

    The four forces redefining connected digital experiences in higher education – Campus Review

    Higher education stands at an unprecedented inflection point. After decades of incremental change, universities worldwide are grappling with converging forces that are fundamentally reshaping what it means to deliver truly connected digital experiences to students, faculty, and staff.

    While 79 per cent of undergraduates feel their university met or exceeded expectations, 29 per cent of degree holders don’t believe their education was worth the cost. Meanwhile, student AI usage has exploded from 66 per cent to 92 per cent in just one year, yet only nine per cent of university technology leaders believe higher education is prepared for this transformation.

    This disconnect reveals the challenge: traditional approaches to digital transformation in universities focused on digitising existing processes rather than reimagining the entire student experience.

    According to Paul Towers, country manager for Liferay Australia, “there’s a clear mismatch between how fast student expectations are evolving and how slow institutions are responding. The next generation of learners have higher expectations than ever for what an optimal student experience looks like.”

    Today, four powerful forces are converging to redefine what “connected” truly means in the university context.

    Force 1: The consumer-grade expectations revolution

    Today’s students are digital natives who don’t differentiate between university services and the consumer applications they use daily. They expect the same personalisation they get from Netflix, the same convenience they experience with Amazon, and the same responsiveness they receive from their banking app.

    Yet amid rising costs and inflation only 60 per cent of students believe they’ll get value for money from their degree. Therefore students increasingly expect their university’s digital platforms to demonstrate clear value and efficiency at every touchpoint.

    This convergence of financial pressure, everyday student challenges, and digital nativity creates unprecedented expectations. Universities must deliver consumer-grade personalisation while addressing the complex, multifaceted nature of student success.

    It’s no longer enough to have separate portals for academics, student services, and campus life, students expect one unified experience that understands their complete journey and responds to their changing needs.

    Force 2: The everything online imperative

    The second force reshaping university digital experiences is students’ expectation that anything they can do on campus, they should be able to do online – efficiently and intuitively.

    Research shows 52 per cent of students use online search engines as their primary research tool, with 68 per cent focusing searches on specific degree programs. This behavior extends throughout their university experience; from course registration and grade checking to meal ordering and appointment scheduling.

    An overwhelming 93 per cent of institutional leaders expect digital tools to have significant impact over the next decade, recognising that digital-first service delivery is no longer optional. Students now use mobile apps for everything from ordering school meals and printing schedules to renting textbooks and checking exam grades.

    However, recent research reveals an important nuance – while students want digital convenience for routine transactions, they increasingly value in-person interactions for complex, collaborative activities.

    “Students don’t think in terms of departments or administrative offices, they think in terms of outcomes. If your digital experience adds friction, you’re making student success harder than it needs to be,” Mr Towers said.

    Leading universities embrace ‘digital-first, human-when-it-matters’ models – removing friction from routine tasks while preserving meaningful human connection.

    Force 3: The AI acceleration effect

    Perhaps no force is reshaping university digital experiences as rapidly as artificial intelligence. The statistics are staggering: 92 per cent of students now use AI in some form, with 88 per cent having used generative AI for assessments.

    Yet there’s a significant readiness gap. While 61 per cent of faculty have used AI in teaching, 88 per cent do so minimally, and only 36 per cent of students have received institutional support to develop AI skills despite overwhelmingly believing these skills are essential.

    This creates both challenge and opportunity.

    “AI is no longer a future trend – it’s a present reality in student workflows,” Mr Towers said.

    Universities that proactively integrate AI into their connected digital experiences can deliver unprecedented personalisation and support. Leading institutions envision AI-powered learning analytics and improved accessibility for both students and faculty.

    The AI revolution in university digital experiences isn’t about replacing human connection – it’s about augmenting it. AI handles routine tasks, supports 24/7, and predicts student challenges early. This frees human staff to focus on the complex, empathetic, relationship-building activities that truly matter in education.

    Force 4: Real-time connected experience

    These three forces are converging toward a vision of truly connected digital experiences that goes far beyond current university technology implementations. The future of a real-time connected experience includes:

    Predictive intelligence: Systems that anticipate student needs before they arise, identifying at-risk students early and proactively connecting them with appropriate support services.

    Hyper-personalisation: Modern learners expect flexible, personalised study paths that align with their commitments.

    Seamless integration: Rather than forcing students to navigate separate systems for academics, student services, career development, and campus life, connected experiences will provide a unified platform with a single source of truth about each student’s complete university journey.

    Accessibility excellence: Universities recognise that AI tools can significantly improve accessibility, creating more inclusive experiences for students with diverse needs and learning preferences.

    As Mr Towers outlines, “this future for students is not just digital. It’s intelligent, integrated and deeply personalised. And more importantly it will become what students expect by default.”

    What this means for universities

    The convergence of these forces is redefining what “connected” means in university digital experiences. It’s no longer sufficient to simply digitise existing processes or provide students with access to multiple systems. True connection requires:

    • Ecosystem thinking: View university experiences as a unified whole.
    • Student-centric design: Design around student journeys, not silos.
    • Proactive engagement: Anticipate needs with data and AI.
    • Human-digital balance: Use tech to enhance human interaction.

    Universities that embrace these principles and invest in truly connected digital experience platforms will be positioned to thrive in an increasingly competitive landscape. Those that continue with fragmented, process-centric approaches risk falling behind as student expectations continue to evolve.

    The question isn’t whether these forces will reshape higher education – they already have. The question is how quickly and strategically institutions will adapt to serve their students in this new reality.

    The universities that get this right won’t just improve their digital offerings; they’ll transform their ability to support student success at scale while maintaining the human connections that make higher education transformational.

    With the AI education market projected to reach $20 billion by 2027, the investment and innovation in this space will only accelerate. The time for universities to reimagine their digital experiences isn’t tomorrow – it’s today.

    Universities like Queensland and George Washington are already moving from fragmented systems to unified digital experiences that meet evolving student expectations.

    If you’re exploring how to unify your university’s digital ecosystem and create more responsive student experiences, Liferay has the expertise and platform to support your journey.

    Learn more about our approach and see how these institutions transformed their digital student experiences.

    Download our exclusive e-book, which explores how three Australian institutions leveraged Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs) here.

    Do you have an idea for a story?
    Email [email protected]

    Source link

  • Why students reject second-language study – Campus Review

    Why students reject second-language study – Campus Review

    Students are turning away from learning a second language other than English because they don’t see it as a viable qualification even though it is a core skill in other countries, experts have flagged.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link

  • Education research centre MCERA closes – Campus Review

    Education research centre MCERA closes – Campus Review

    A not-for-profit research centre that provided media training for academics and disseminated education research to the public will close after eight years of operation.

    Please login below to view content or subscribe now.

    Membership Login

    Source link