Tag: Flagship

  • 2 flagship universities select leaders after abrupt resignations

    2 flagship universities select leaders after abrupt resignations

    The end of 2025 didn’t just usher in winter break but also major leadership changes.

    Two East Coast flagships, the University of Virginia and the University of Delaware, named new presidents, each of whom took office on Jan. 1. But UVA’s decision to name a president in December defied the wishes of Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger, potentially setting the stage for contentious relations between her and the university’s board.

    At least two religious institutions also announced leadership transitions last month, some making mid-academic year pivots.

    Below, we’re rounding up a selection of last month’s most notable college leadership changes.

    President: Brian Konkol
    Institution: Valparaiso University
    Coming or going? Coming

    Valparaiso University on Dec. 2 selected Brian Konkol as its new president. Konkol joins the Lutheran institution from Syracuse University, where he served as vice president, dean and professor.

    Konkol assumed the role on Jan. 1.

    Like many small religious institutions, Valparaiso’s finances have been shaky in recent years. 

    The university implemented a suite of cuts in 2024, eliminating over two dozen academic programs with low enrollment and nixing an undisclosed number of faculty positions. 

    Valparaiso’s last leader, José Padilla, said at the time that the cuts were “not solely a cost cutting initiative” and were also intended to “meet the expectations of our students and the demands of the market.” Six months later, Padilla announced he would resign when his contract expired on Dec. 31.

    S&P Global Ratings in May gave Valparaiso’s bonds a BB+ rating, which reflects some credit risk. The university’s attempt to sell $54 million in bonds faced delays, according to Bloomberg, but they went through in July.

     

    President: Kathleen Getz
    Institution: Mercyhurst University
    Coming or going? Going

    Mercyhurst University President Kathleen Getz will retire at the end of June, the Catholic institution announced Dec. 2.

    Under Getz, the Pennsylvania university served as a teach-out option for students who attended Notre Dame College of Ohio, a nearby religious institution that shuttered in 2024.

    Mercyhurst also moved up to NCAA’s Division 1. Getz said at the time that the transition would allow the small private college to collaborate and compete with “universities and athletic programs in new and larger markets.”

    The university also made staffing cuts, though they were less dramatic than those at other peer colleges. It cut five administrative and staff positions in June. Getz told the Erie Times-News that the cuts were not indicative of larger financial struggles at the university.

    Mercyhurst’s board selected David Livingston as the institution’s interim president for a term of two years, beginning when Getz steps down. Livingston is a former Mercyhurst faculty member and administrator who more recently led Lourdes and Lewis universities.

    President: Greg Cant
    Institution: Wilkes University
    Coming or going? Going

    Greg Cant will retire as Wilkes University’s president in August, per a Dec. 8 statement from the university.

    The announcement came just days after Cant informed university stakeholders that the private Pennsylvania institution had implemented a plan that had closed a roughly $7 million budget deficit.

    The deficit first became public knowledge when The Citizens’ Voice obtained a copy of an October letter to the campus community detailing the shortfall, which attributed it in part to a “breakdown in process” and “failure in leadership.” The projected gap followed a $2.8 million deficit the previous year that left officials “surprised,” according to The Citizens’ Voice.

    The university faced student protests in the fall demanding more transparency from administrators. Wilkes last month did not publicly share details about how it had addressed the budget gap, but a university spokesperson told The Citizens’ Voice it will “share any additional updates when they are available.”

    Effective immediately, Wilkes’ senior vice president and provost, David Ward, assumed the role of chief operating officer and provost “to support the University in this time of leadership transition,” the university said in its Dec. 8 release.

    President: James Clements
    Institution: Clemson University
    Coming or going? Going

    Clemson University President James Clements announced on Dec. 9 that he would retire at the end of the month, after leading the South Carolina institution for 12 years. The abrupt notice came after Clemson’s board approved a five-year contract extension for Clements in October 2024.

    The public research university has repeatedly been in the public eye over the last year, both for its financial woes and its responses to political pressure. 

    Clemson froze all spending that wasn’t “mission critical,” restricted employee travel and suspended hiring amid reports it needed to cut $63 million from its budget. According to an email shared with The Post and Courier, the university said it was not facing a deficit and no jobs were in danger.

    The university also froze its in-state tuition rate for undergraduates to secure more state funding.

    Source link

  • Tuition and Fees at Flagship and Land Grant Universities over time

    Tuition and Fees at Flagship and Land Grant Universities over time

    If you believe you can extract strategy from prior activities, I have something for you to try to make sense of here.  This is a long compilation of tuition and fees at America’s Flagship and Land Grant institutions.  If you are not quite sure about the distinction between those two types of institutions, you might want to read this first.  TLDR: Land Grants were created by an act of congress, and for this purpose, flagships are whoever I say they are.  There doesn’t seem to be a clear definition.  

    Further, for this visualization, I’ve only selected the first group of Land Grants, funded by the Morrill Act of 1862.  They tend to be the arch rival of the Flagship, unless, of course, they’re the same institution.

    Anyway, today I’m looking at tuition, something you’d think would be pretty simple.  But there are at least four ways to measure this: Tuition, of course, but also tuition and required fees, and both are different for residents and nonresidents.  Additionally, you can use those variables to create all sorts of interesting variables, like the gap between residents and nonresidents, the ratio of that gap to resident tuition, or even several ways to look at the role “required fees” change the tuition equation.  All would be–in a perfect world–driven by strategy.  I’m not sure I’d agree that such is the case.

    Take a look and see if you agree.

    There are five views here, each getting a little more complex.  I know people are afraid to interact with these visualizations, but I promise you can’t break anything.  So click away.

    The first view (using the tabs across the top) compares state resident full-time, first-time, undergraduate tuition and required fees (yellow) to those for nonresidents (red bar). The black line shows the gap ratio.  For instance, if resident tuition is $10,000 and nonresident tuition is $30,000, the gap is $20,000, and that is 2x the resident rate.  The view defaults to the University of Michigan, but don’t cheat yourself: Us the filter at top left to pick any other school. If you’ve read this blog before, you know why Penn State is showing strange data.  It’s not you, it’s IPEDS, so don’t ask.)

    The second tab shows four data points explicitly, and more implicitly.  This view starts with the University of Montana, but the control lets you change that.  On top is resident tuition (purple) and resident tuition and fees (yellow). Notice how the gap between the two varies, suggesting the role of fees in the total cost of attendance.  The bottom shows those figures for nonresidents.

    The third view looks a little crazy. Choose a value to display at top left, and the visualization will rank all 77 institutions from highest to lowest.  Use the control at top right to highlight an institution to put it in a national context.  Hover over the dots for details in a popup box.  If you want to look at a smaller set of institutions, you can do that, too, using the filters right above the chart.  The fourth view is the exact same, but shows the actual values, rather than the rank.  As always, hover for details.

    Finally, the fifth view is a custom scatter plot: Choose the variable you want on the x-axis and the variable to plot it against on the y-axis.  Then use the filters to limit the included institutions. As always, let me know what you find that’s interesting.

    Source link