Tag: Fun

  • Fun with Tuition Data | HESA

    Fun with Tuition Data | HESA

    I want to show you something kind of intriguing about how tuition is changing in Canada.

    By now you might be familiar with a chart that looks like Figure 1, which shows average tuition, exclusive of ancillary fees (which would tack another $900-1000 on to the total), in constant $2024. The story it shows is one of persistent real increases from up until 2017-18, at which point, mainly thanks to policy changes in Ontario, tuition falls sharply and continues to fall as tuition increases across the country failed to keep up with inflation in the COVID years. Result: average tuition today, in real terms, is about where it was in 2012-13.  

    Figure 1: Average Undergraduate Tuition Fee, Canada, in $2024, 2006-07 to 2024-25

    Simple story, right? Boring, even.  

    But then, just for fun, I decided to look at tuition at the level of individual fields of study. And what I found was kind of interesting. Take a look at Figure 2, which shows average tuition in what you might call the university’s three “core” areas: social science, humanities, and physical/life sciences. It’s quite a different story. The pre-2018 rise was never as pronounced as it was for tuition overall, and the drop in tuition post-2018 was more pronounced. As a result, tuition in the humanities is about even with where it was in 2006 and in the sciences is now three percent lower than it was in 2006.

    Figure 2: Average Undergraduate Tuition Fee by Field of Study, Canada, in $2024, 2006-07 to 2024-25

    This got me thinking: how is it possible that the overall average tuition is rising so quickly when so many big disciplines are showing so little change? So I looked at the change in each discipline from 2006-07 to 2024-25. Figures 3 and 4 show the 18-year change in tuition for direct- and second-entry programs (and yes, this is an admittedly English Canadian distinction, since the programs in Figure 4 are also at least partially direct entry in Quebec).

    Figure 3: Change in Real Tuition Levels, direct-entry undergraduate programs, Canada, 2006-07 to 2024-25

    Figure 4: Change in Real Tuition Levels, second-entry undergraduate programs, Canada, 2006-07 to 2024-25

    Two very different pictures, right? Quite clearly, second-entry degrees – which are a tiny fraction of overall enrolments – are nevertheless dragging the overall average up quite a bit. Unfortunately, it’s not easy to work out exactly how much because – inexplicably – Statscan does not use the same field of study boundaries for enrolment and tuition. But, near as I can figure out, there are about 15,000 students in law in Canada, 5,000 in pharmacy, 3,000 in dentistry and 2,000 in veterinary science. So that’s 25,000 students (or 2% of the undergraduate total) in fields with very high tuition increases, and a little back-of-the-envelope math suggests that these increases for just 2% of the student body were responsible for about 15% of all tuition growth.  

    Now, there is one other thing you have to look at and that is what is going on in engineering. This field has the fastest-growing real tuition over the period (26%) but is also the fastest-growing field in terms of domestic student enrolments (up 56% over the same period, compared to 16% for universities as a whole). So, compared with a world where engineering enrolments stayed steady between 2006-07 and 2024-25, an extra 22,000 people voluntarily enrolled in a field of study which was both more expensive (compared to science, average engineering tuition is about $2500 higher) and increasingly so every year. Again, a little back-of-the-envelope math shows that this phenomenon was responsible for between 10 and 11% of the growth in overall average tuition.  

    So, let’s add all that up: about a quarter of all the real growth in tuition over the past 20 years (which, as we noted at the outset wasn’t all that much to begin with) was due to tuition growth in the country’s most expensive programs. These are programs which are either growing rapidly or have long waiting lists, so I think the argument that these tuition increases have deterred enrolment is a bit far-fetched. And it means that the vast majority of students are seeing tuition fees which are well below the “average”. In fact, by my calculations, the actual increase in real dollars for that portion of the student body in first-degree programs – bar engineering – is somewhere around $625 in eighteen years.

    Affordability crisis? Not really.

    Source link

  • Fun with Participation Rate Data

    Fun with Participation Rate Data

    Just a quick one today, mostly charts.

    Back in the fall, StatsCan released a mess of data from the Labour Force Survey looking at education participation rates—that is, the percentage of any given age cohort that is attending education—over the past 25 years. So, let’s go see what it says.

    Figure 1 shows total education participation rates, across all levels of education, from age 15 to 29, for selected years over the past quarter century. At the two ends of the graph, the numbers look pretty similar. At age 15, we’ve always had 95%+ of our population enrolled in school (almost exclusively secondary education, and from age 26 and above, we’ve always been in the low-tweens or high single digits. The falling-off in participation is fairly steady: for every age-year above 17, about 10% of the population exits education up until the age of 26. The big increase in education enrolments that we’ve seen over the past couple of decades has really occurred in the 18-24 range, where participation rates (almost exclusively in universities, as we shall see) have increased enormously.

    Figure 1: Participation rates in Education (all institutions) by Age, Canada, select years 1999-00 to 2023-24

    Figure 2 shows current participation rates by age and type of postsecondary institution. People sometimes have the impression that colleges cater to an “older” clientele, but in fact, at any given age under 30, Canadians are much more likely to be enrolled in universities than in colleges. Colleges have a very high base in the teens because of the way the CEGEP system works in Quebec (I’ll come back to regional diversity in a minute), and it is certainly true that there is a very wide gap in favour of universities among Canadians in their mid-20s. But while the part rate gap narrows substantially at about age 25, it is never the case that the college participation rate surpasses the university one.

    Figure 2: Participation Rates by Age and Institution Type, Canada, 2023-24

    Figure 3 shows college participation rates by age over time. What you should take from this is that there has been a slight decline in college participation rates over time in the 19-23 age range, but beyond that not much has changed.

    Figure 3: College Participation Rates by Age, Selected Years, 1999-2000 to 2023-24

    Figure 4 uses the same lens as figure 3 only for universities. And it’s about as different as it can be. In 1999, fewer than one in ten Canadians aged 18 was in university: now it is three in ten. In 1999, only one in four 21 year-olds was in university, now it is four-in-ten. These aren’t purely the effects of increased demand; the elimination of grade 13 in Ontario had a lot to do with the changes for 18-year-olds; Alberta and British Columbia converting a number of their institutions from colleges to universities in the late 00s probably juices these numbers a bit, too. But on the whole, what we’ve seen is a significant increase in the rate at which young people are choosing to attend universities between the ages of 18 and 24. However, beyond those ages the growth is less pronounced. There was certainly growth in older student participation rates between 1999-00 and 20011-12, but since then none at all.

    Figure 4: University Participation Rates by Age, Selected Years, 1999-2000 to 2023-24

    So much for the national numbers: what’s going on at the provincial level? Well, because this is the Labour Force Survey, which unlike administrative data has sample size issues, we can’t quite get the same level of granularity of information. We can’t look at individual ages, but we can see age-ranges, in this case ages 20-24. In figures 5 and 6 (I broke them up so they are a bit easier to read), I show how each province’s university and college participation rates in 2000 vs. 2023.

    Figure 5: University Participation Rates for 20-24 Year-olds, Four Largest Provinces, 2000-01 vs. 2023-24

    Figure 6: University Participation Rates for 20-24 Year-olds, Six Remaining Provinces, 2000-01 vs. 2023-24

    Some key facts emerge from these two graphs:

    • The highest participation rates in the country are in Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia.
    • In all provinces, the participation rate in universities is higher than it is for colleges, ranging from 2.5x in Quebec for over 4x in Saskatchewan.
    • Over the past quarter century, overall postsecondary participation rates and university participation rates have gone up in all provinces; Alberta and British Columbia alone have seen a decline in college participation rates, due to the aforementioned decision to convert certain colleges to university status in the 00s.
    • Growth in participation rates since 2000 has been universal but has been more significant in the country’s four largest provinces, where the average gain has been nine percentage points, and the country’s six smaller provinces, where the gain has been just under five percent.
    • Over twenty-five years, British Columbia has gone from ninth to second in the country in terms of university participation rates, while Nova Scotia has gone second to ninth.
    • New Brunswick has consistently been in last place for overall participation rates for the entire century.

    Just think: three minutes ago, you probably knew very little about participation rates in Canada by age and geography, now you know almost everything there is to know about participation rates in Canada by age and geography. Is this a great way to start your day or what?

    Source link

  • 15 Inspiring & Fun Teacher Desk Setup Ideas (2024)

    15 Inspiring & Fun Teacher Desk Setup Ideas (2024)

    Looking to refresh your workspace with a fun and inspiring teacher desk setup? Whether you’re in a classroom or teaching from home, your desk can be a creative hub that fuels productivity and positivity. From colorful organizers to cozy lighting, the right setup can transform your space into one that sparks joy.

    Check out these inspiring desk ideas to give your teaching environment a fresh new vibe!

    Teacher Desk Setup Inspiration

    15.

    Teacher Desk

    14.

    Teacher Desk

    13.

    Teacher Desk

    12.

    Teacher Desk

    11.

    Teacher Desk

    10.

    Teacher Desk

    9.

    Teacher Desk

    8.

    Teacher Desk

    7.

    Teacher Desk

    6.

    Teacher Desk

    5.

    Teacher Desk

    4.

    Teacher Desk

    3.

    Teacher Desk

    2.

    Teacher Desk

    1.

    Teacher Desk


    Chris

    Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

    Source link

  • Build Psychological Safety and Fun Into the Workplace to Reduce Overwork and Burnout – CUPA-HR

    Build Psychological Safety and Fun Into the Workplace to Reduce Overwork and Burnout – CUPA-HR

    by CUPA-HR | September 28, 2022

    In the wake of the Great Resignation and talent recruitment challenges, heavy workloads have led to stress and burnout for some employees. One way higher ed HR pros can help identify sources of stress and mitigate burnout is by considering employees’ work environments. Are invisible pressures placed on employees, causing team members to downplay or hide their concerns about heavy workloads, or can employees be honest about their concerns and feel comfortable bringing their whole selves to work each day? How would employees describe the atmosphere where they work? Are levity and humor weaved into the workday, or is the lack of levity contributing to feelings of being overwhelmed?

    In the recent CUPA-HR virtual workshop, How to Manage Unmanageable Workloads, presenter Jennifer Moss explained how building psychological safety and bringing the fun back to work can reduce the impact of overwork and burnout. So what is psychological safety, and how can HR integrate it and the elements of fun and play into the workplace?

    Increase Psychological Safety

    “Psychological safety is the ability to reveal one’s true self and opinions without fear that doing so will lead to negative repercussions in terms of reputation, career, status or relationships with others,” explains Why Psychological Safety Matters Now More Than Ever, an article in the Spring 2021 issue of Higher Ed HR Magazine. Teams with high psychological safety see more open conversations between team members and managers about their work. They feel comfortable sharing honestly because they know they won’t be punished simply for doing so.

    Read the article to learn how HR pros can elevate psychological safety in the workplace by attending to systems and structures, supporting employees to forge connections, and fostering a learning orientation.

    Bring Back the Fun

    Although HR has much serious work to do, leaders can look for opportunities to incorporate fun, where appropriate. The application of fun and play has been shown to reduce stress and feelings of burnout while also improving creativity and productivity in working environments. Having fun at work has shown to have a positive impact on employee morale, engagement and camaraderie, all of which collectively have an influence on an organization’s culture. Here are some ideas to bring back the fun and stimulate play in the workplace.

    Encourage Humor

    Similar to incorporating more fun into the workplace, there are also plenty of benefits to weaving humor into the workplace. This element of work is sometimes considered non-essential but has many emotional and physical benefits that make us happier and healthier at work. Humor builds trust in relationships; a culture where it’s okay to admit failure; and happier, healthier employees. Learn how to conduct a humor audit to analyze where your workplace humor went right and ways to use it more effectively.

    Related resources:

    Health and Well-Being Toolkit (CUPA-HR members-only toolkit)

    How to Bring the Fun at Work (Higher Ed Workplace Blog)



    Source link