Tag: Grow

  • Hawaiian Language Schools Grow As DOE Shrinks. There’s One Big Problem – The 74

    Hawaiian Language Schools Grow As DOE Shrinks. There’s One Big Problem – The 74


    Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

    At a time when local schools are facing shrinking enrollment and talks of closure, Hawaiian immersion programs are bucking the trend. 

    Enrollment in schools that teach primarily in ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi — collectively known as Kaiapuni schools — has increased by 68% over the past decade, with the number of campuses run by the state education department growing from 14 to 26. But students tend to have fewer immersion options in middle and high school, and the pool of qualified teachers isn’t keeping up with families’ growing demand.

    Recruiting qualified teachers is one of the largest barriers to expanding Kaiapuni programs, Office of Hawaiian Education Director Kau‘i Sang said in a recent education board meeting. The Department of Education needs to find a balance between adding more classrooms to meet families’ needs and hiring enough teachers to support existing Kaiapuni schools, she said. 

    DOE plans on opening two new Kaiapuni programs at Haleʻiwa Elementary on Oʻahu and Kalanianaʻole Elementary on the Big Island.

    “We cannot open classrooms unless we have qualified staff,” Sang said. 

    Currently, DOE has three unfilled Kaiapuni teacher positions, Communications Director Nanea Ching said in an emailed statement. The department also employs 25 unlicensed Kaiapuni educators who still need to fulfill their teacher training requirements, she said. 

    But the number of additional teachers needed to fully staff Kaiapuni schools could be closer to 100, said Kananinohea Mākaʻimoku, an associate professor at the University of Hawaiʻi Hilo’s College of Hawaiian Language. Some Kaiapuni teachers are taking on larger-than-average class sizes because of staffing shortages, she said, meaning the annual vacancy rates underestimate the number of educators schools need. 

    DOE will need 165 more Kaiapuni teachers in the next decade to fully staff its classrooms and meet families’ growing demand, according to ʻAha Kauleo, an advisory group of Hawaiian language schools and organizations. The projection doesn’t account for a large group of teachers who are expected to retire in the coming years, Mākaʻimoku said.

    Last year, UH Mānoa and Hilo produced a total of 12 licensed Kaiapuni teachers.

    It’s difficult to find candidates who are both fluent in Hawaiian and interested in teaching, Mākaʻimoku said, especially because Hawaiian language speakers are in high demand in many careers. But a lack of teachers doesn’t mean schools should stop expanding Kaiapuni programs, she said, especially when the movement has so much family support and momentum. 

    ‘No Option But To Leave Their Home District’

    The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court has previously ruled that the education department has a constitutional duty to provide families with access to Hawaiian immersion education. Two lawsuits filed in August argued that DOE has fallen short of this responsibility by creating unique barriers for immersion families, such as waitlists for enrollment and limited immersion programs in some school districts.

    One of the lawsuits was dropped over the summer, but the second remains active. 

    Currently, families are pushing for more immersion options in Pearl City, which has no middle or high school for Kaiapuni students. Children can attend the Kaiapuni program at Waiau Elementary until the sixth grade but then need to transfer to immersion programs in Kapolei or Honolulu for middle school or switch to an English-language program.

    A petition to add Kaiapuni programs at Highlands Intermediate and Pearl City High School received more than 100 signatures over the past three weeks. 

    “Our keiki start their educational journey in Hawaiian immersion programs, but upon reaching intermediate and high school levels, they find themselves with no option but to leave their home district,” parent Chloe Puaʻena Vierra-Villanueva said in written testimony to the Board of Education.

    The department is planning to add more grade levels to existing Kaiapuni schools next year and provide families with more information on how to enroll in immersion programs, Sang said. Her office also plans on tracking the number of open seats and waitlists across the state to determine which communities have the greatest demand for Kaiapuni classrooms. 

    Since 2020, the state has also offered a $8,000 salary bonus to Kaiapuni teachers to attract more people to classroom positions. 

    Kahea Faria, an assistant specialist at UH Mānoa’s College of Education and a Kaiapuni parent, said she would like to see more DOE campuses solely dedicated to serving immersion students across all grade levels. Creating environments where Hawaiian is the only spoken language is critical to students’ development, she said, and could possibly encourage more kids to pursue teaching careers in Kaiapuni schools. 

    “Right now, with a growing number of students, they have very limited opportunities to grow their language abilities,” Faria said. 

    The state also needs to look beyond Kaiapuni graduates to expand the potential pool of immersion teachers, Mākaʻimoku said. For example, she said, offering more Hawaiian language classes to families and community members could encourage more people to earn their Kaiapuni teaching credentials. 

    “That’s definitely a conversation that all communities in Hawaiʻi should have,” she said. 

    This story was originally published on Honolulu Civil Beat.


    Did you use this article in your work?

    We’d love to hear how The 74’s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers. Tell us how

    Source link

  • Year in Review: Updating Your Strategy to Grow Smarter

    Year in Review: Updating Your Strategy to Grow Smarter

    Why Higher Ed Institutions Should Use Annual Reviews to Refocus Their Strategy

    Organizational development principles teach us that long-term, sustainable change is achieved through making data-driven decisions, continuously learning and adjusting, and intentionally planning for growth. Which is why an annual review of your existing higher education programs and operations is an essential step in the process for building your institution’s success. 

    Skipping a review in the planning process puts your institution at risk of repeating mistakes and missing crucial opportunities due to an outdated approach. 

    In every area and at every level, institutions benefit from looking back at data from the previous year for clues into what adjustments are needed for improvement. From holding project retrospectives and conducting marketing audits to tracking enrollment trends and having individual performance check-ins, regular rituals that facilitate reflection on what’s working and what isn’t encourage continuous growth. 

    Similarly, creating an annual review process for your degree programs empowers your institution to assess its efficiency while using data-driven insights to build a strategic road map for the future.

    Change starts from within. The best way to achieve growth is by being honest about where you are now and where you want to be. At Archer, we go through a robust discovery process with our partner institutions to understand the unique challenges and opportunities their online programs and the institutions themselves face in today’s dynamic higher ed landscape.

    Common Pitfalls in Strategy Resets

    Strategy resets often simply recycle old plans instead of applying lessons learned. Contrary to what you may think, plans built on evidence from the past are much easier to implement and keep on track than recycled plans. Here are three common pitfalls your institution should avoid when planning for the future.

    Pitfall #1: Following Assumptions Over Evidence

    When leaders fail to connect data and insights from past performance to future goals, important trends are missed and errors are doomed to be repeated. Analyzing available metrics and assessing risks ultimately leads to more intelligent plans that can increase enrollment and support positive student outcomes. Marrying your intuition and insights with data makes for a stronger strategy. 

    Pitfall #2: Allowing Siloed Departments to Slow Progress

    Honest assessments across functional areas only happen when teams work together. Every corner of the university should be represented in the review process; marketing, information technology, enrollment, financial aid, the registrar, faculty, administration, and leadership all need to be aligned. 

    This is hard work, but you can start by finding ways to collaborate with a department that you work with regularly and then expand that collaboration to other departments. Look for more opportunities throughout the year for better cross-departmental communication and collaboration. 

    Pitfall #3: Limiting Plans to the Near Future Without Considering the Bigger Picture

    Institutions should prevent letting their short-term tactics override their long-term goals. When you tie your institutional goals to your departmental goals, you create a natural flow of work and have an easier time communicating your successes up the chain of command. By regularly reviewing their goals and assessing if their work is on track or needs revisiting, teams are able to course-correct when necessary — before reaching the end of the year.

    Using Postmortem Frameworks for Smarter Growth

    Fortunately, there are plenty of techniques that can be used to create an effective review process. Postmortem meetings, data analysis, planning worksheets, and open communication can fuel an insightful retrospective. 

    When approached with the intent to learn from the past and find areas for improvement, a postmortem meeting offers a crucial opportunity for an organization to reflect on its progress. In postmortem meetings, individuals and teams consider how successful a project or period of time was and pinpoint what to change moving forward. Risk assessments are also particularly useful to help teams prepare for possible enrollment and market shifts in the future. 

    By harnessing the power of analytics reporting and postmortem agreements, teams can co-create realistic road maps that connect their vision with the institution’s operational capacity. Getting buy-in from all departments by engaging them in cooperative planning gives everyone the chance to discuss their team’s areas of strength and the areas where additional support may be needed. 

    Institutions that follow Archer’s Good, Better, Best framework are able to get a clear view of where they currently stand and what they should prioritize next to achieve consistent growth.

    Key Takeaways

    • Avoid common strategy reset pitfalls by first taking account of where you are now and then determining where you want to be.
    • By leveraging data, collaboration, and iterative improvement strategies, institutions use proven organizational development techniques to stay competitive.
    • Postmortems, planning tools, and governance help leaders sustain their institution’s progress. 

    Let Archer Support Your Year-in-Review Process

    Institutional growth requires a tailored approach, and the path looks different for every organization. At Archer Education, we understand that deep discovery, organizational development, sufficient investment, best-in-class technology, and a laser focus on the student experience are essential.

    Are you ready to expand your institution’s online program offerings, elevate your student enrollments, future-proof your teams, or all of the above? Then allow the talented Archer team to support your institution by helping you establish a year-in-review process and uncover new possibilities for sustainable growth. 

    If you’d like to learn more, contact our team and explore our technology-enabled strategy marketing, enrollment, and retention services today.

    Source link

  • Underrepresented Applicants Grow, Foreign Applicants Drop

    Underrepresented Applicants Grow, Foreign Applicants Drop

    New early-applicant data from the Common App found that applications from Black, low-income, first-generation and rural potential students are all up compared to this point last year. However, international applications dipped, and the most selective institutions are experiencing the smallest application growth compared to other types of institutions. Applicants are also increasingly choosing to submit standardized test scores.

    The Common App report, released Thursday, is the first in a series of monthly research briefs on college applicant trends typically released between November and March. The November brief showed that applicants, and applications, rose over all compared to this time last year, with notable growth among particular groups.

    For example, applications from those who identified as Black or African American increased 16 percent and multiracial applicants rose 11 percent compared to the same time last application season. The report also found that applicants who identified as first-generation grew by 12 percent, while low-income applicants, who qualified for a Common App fee waiver, increased at more than twice the rate of other applicants. Rural applicants grew by 15 percent compared to last year, while those from metropolitan areas grew only 6 percent.

    But the number of international students applying dropped 9 percent compared to this point last year, driven by a 14 percent drop in applicants from India, which has historically been the second-biggest source of international applicants on the Common App platform after China. Applicants from Asia broadly and from Africa also dropped significantly, 9 percent and 18 percent respectively, with a whopping 43 percent decline in applicants from Ghana. These trends suggest the Trump administration’s policies, including international student visa delays and denials, may be deterring students.

    At a time when highly selective institutions are under new political pressures, the report found that colleges and universities with admit rates of 25 percent or below had the slowest application growth, at 4 percent. Applications to other types of institutions grew at two or three times that rate.

    The return of standardized test requirements at some institutions is also driving more applicants to submit test scores. Notably, applications reporting scores rose 11 percent compared to this time last year. However, students who identify as underrepresented minorities or first-generation or who qualify for a Common App waiver were less likely to share their scores.

    Source link

  • Higher Education Inquirer Continues to Grow

    Higher Education Inquirer Continues to Grow

    The Higher Education Inquirer’s viewership continues to grow. In the last week, we have had more than 30,000 views, and that’s without SEO help.  Some of the content in HEI may be found elsewhere, but our in-depth historical and sociological analysis is rare for a blog or any other news source. HEI also relies on scholars and activists for our outstanding content.  Thank you, Henry GirouxGary Roth, and Bryan Alexander for allowing us to post your work.  And thanks to LACCD Whistleblower and Michael S. Hainline for your investigative exposes.  If you missed any of their articles, please click on their links. FYI: The Higher Education Inquirer archive also includes more than 700 articles and videos. Please check them out and let us know what you think. We want to hear from all sides of the College Meltdown.   

    Source link

  • CoSN State Chapters Grow With Additions of MACE and CoSNE

    CoSN State Chapters Grow With Additions of MACE and CoSNE

    Washington, D.C.– CoSN today announced that the Mid-America Association for Computers in Education ( MACE) and the Nebraska Chapter of the Consortium for School Networking ( CoSNE) have been approved by the CoSN Board of Directors as official State Chapters. CoSN State Chapters play a crucial role in advancing the organization’s mission at the local level. These chapters provide a platform for education technology leaders to collaborate, share best practices and advocate for innovative solutions in their regions. Through networking events, professional development opportunities and policy influence, CoSN State Chapters empower members to drive impactful change in their school districts.

    MACE is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to advancing educational technology by fostering collaboration, sharing best practices and supporting educators in the effective use of technology. The organization works to enhance education through responsible use of hardware and software, engage with industry partners to establish technical standards, and connect professionals in the field.   CoSNE was established by the Nebraska Association of Technology Administrators ( NATA), along with a group of Nebraska K-12 chief technology officers, chief information officers and technology directors in smaller districts/regions — or not previously associated with NATA. CoSNE is advancing the focus on policy advocacy, professional development, and engagement with state and national entities to advance educational technology leadership and best practices for every K-12 technology leader across Nebraska.