Tag: Oregon

  • How a small Oregon district turns data into action

    How a small Oregon district turns data into action

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    Lessons In Leadership is an ongoing series in which K-12 principals and superintendents share their best practices as well as challenges overcome. For more installments, click here.

    Umatilla School District — a 1,500-student school system in eastern Oregon with a 72% Latino student population, 54% English learners and a 45% student poverty rate —  is setting the standard for effective, streamlined data management.

    As an educator in the district since 2000 and superintendent since 2007, Superintendent Heidi Sipe has seen Umatilla’s data systems evolve from pivot tables and spreadsheets to a mix of digital platforms tracking myriad data points for each student.

    This is a headshot of Heidi Sipe, superintendent of Umatilla School District in Umatilla, Ore.

    Heidi Sipe

    Permission granted by Heidi Sipe

     

    Part of the key, she says, is ensuring that there’s a common platform that consolidates student data points from other tools being used. This allows educators to look for trends and actionable data so they can identify students who may be at risk or need intervention plans, Sipe said.

    “We can check the efficacy of those supports and see if we need to make an adjustment or if we need to keep that going for that student to ensure their success,” Sipe told K-12 Dive.

    We recently caught up with Sipe to learn more about how the district uses that data to organize interventions, manages data anxiety, and helps parents understand the numbers.

    Editor’s Note: The following interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

    K-12 DIVE: For many people, the idea of using data and processing data can be kind of daunting. When you’re introducing any sort of data tool to educators or school leaders or even parents, how do you get them comfortable with the idea of working with that data if they have any sort of anxiety about it or are overwhelmed?

    HEDI SIPE: I think part of the overwhelm is it’s kind of “Data, data everywhere, and not a drop to use.”

    The data points we’re using every month in our data team meetings are attendance — we track historical and last 30 days — and we also track disciplinary incidents, whether it be referrals or in-school suspension, out-of-school suspension, detentions.

    We also track grades in students’ core classes, as well as overall GPA and course pass rate. And then we track our MAP data in English reading, Spanish reading, mathematics, and English language usage. We track DIBELS at the elementary level — K-3 — for progress monitoring of students in their literacy development. We use a dyslexia screener through DIBELS, and then we also have some of our intervention programs that again are supplying more data.

    So when we have all of those various pieces at play, it can be really hard for a teacher to go platform to platform to platform to check the status of a student. But when all of that’s consolidated into one place, it goes from a situation of overwhelm to a quick snapshot based off of all those various pieces, which helps us make better-informed decisions for students.

    Let’s say you’re the classroom educator or the school principal, and you see in your data tools that a student is chronically absent or disengaged or their test scores are slipping, what are the first steps that you then take to put that data into action and figure out how to help that student?

    SIPE: We have a color-coded intervention list. So, anything that’s green, a teacher team can assign a student without any admin approval. If they’ve tried at least a few green interventions and they have monitored those for at least a couple of months, then they can move up and assign an orange level intervention, again without any admin approval.

    If that’s not working, they can assign a red intervention, and that would require admin approval. And then we also have various interventions where the admin can add it, and those are gray in our category. That’s things like an attendance letter to parents, a home visit an admin has done, etc., so the staff knows, “OK, here’s what the admin’s already doing for the student.”

    There may be nursing services and things like that which are happening, and they can also refer students for those types of things. If they notice a student is, perhaps, chronically absent, but it’s a student who keeps having ear infections or earaches, we have a partnership with a local doctor. If the parents are participating in that partnership, we can actually run the student to the doctor during school hours, with the parents’ permission, and make sure the kids are getting to those appointments and that we’re able to work with parents as partners in supporting that student and getting the medical attention they need so they can stay in school.

    Those types of partnerships happen because we can see that data. Those types of partnerships happen because families and teachers know these are the interventions available, and they can either request them from us or we can assign them. That’s really a helpful tool.

    It’s also really empowering to staff to be able to make those decisions. They’re working with the kids every day. They know what’s up.

    When staff — whether it’s school and district leaders or the classroom educators — are working with parents to help them make sense of their children’s data, what are some of the most effective ways they can help them do that?

    SIPE: So, my children are grown now. However, when they were younger, whatever they were experiencing seemed normal to me at the time, and wherever they were at seemed normal to me, because I wasn’t in any way comparing them to another child.

    But it’s another thing to realize, “Oh, goodness. My child’s really behind in this,” because they can see that comparative data.

    That helped me get more onboard when one of my children needed some interventions. And then it was very helpful for me to see those interventions work and see that child really take off as a really strong reader after those interventions. The teachers were able to show me, “Hang on, this is different than peers,” and then, “Here’s what we’re going to do about it.”

    That really helped me build trust in the teachers who were supporting my child.

    Source link

  • Southern Oregon University to cut 23 programs and lay off 18 employees

    Southern Oregon University to cut 23 programs and lay off 18 employees

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    Dive Brief:

    • Southern Oregon University will eliminate 10 bachelor’s degrees, 12 minors and one graduate program in the face of long-term structural budget deficits after a vote by the institution’s board.
    • The public university will also lay off 18 employees and cut roughly three dozen other jobs through retirements, the elimination of vacant positions and other methods. SOU will shift 17 jobs off its payroll by funding them through alternative sources, such as the SOU Foundation, a nonprofit affiliated with the university.
    • The cuts are intended to stabilize SOU following years “marked by unprecedented fiscal crises,” according to the plan approved by trustees last week in a 7-2 vote.

    Dive Insight:

    SOU has faced a quartet of problems plaguing other higher education institutions — declining enrollment, flat state funding, rising costs and a shifting federal policy landscape.

    The university’s full-time equivalent enrollment fell almost 22% from 4,108 students in 2015 to 3,209 in 2024, according to state data. 

    “It is also highly likely that the federal government’s intent to dismantle support systems for low-income students also will have a devastating impact,” the plan noted.

    Earlier this year, the Trump administration sought to reduce funding to certain need-based student aid programs and eliminate others altogether, such as the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant program. Since then, both chambers of Congress have rejected some of those overtures in their own budget proposals for fiscal year 2026, though House lawmakers likewise pitched eliminating FSEOG. 

    At the state level, Oregon’s fiscal 2025-27 budget raised funding for its public universities slightly. But SOU argued that the bump fails to cover increasing costs outside of its control, such as retirement and medical benefits.

    In June, SOU’s board of trustees directed the university to find $5 million in savings by the end of fiscal 2026.

    In response, University President Rick Bailey planned more significant cuts to set SOU up for longer-term stability. He declared financial exigency at the beginning of August, paving the way for a dramatic restructuring at the institution.

    The plan pitched to SOU’s board Friday will cut more than $10 million from the university’s annual educational and general budget over the next four years, bringing it down to approximately $60 million total.

    Academically, the proposal will sunset “low-enrolled or less regionally relevant programs” to focus on “what SOU does best for the majority of students,” it said.

    Following the reduction, the university will offer a total of 30 majors and 19 minors meant to lead students toward interdisciplinary programs “aligned with regional workforce demands.”

    “SOU is no longer a comprehensive university,” the plan said. “We cannot continue to provide all the programs and supports as we have in the past.”

    Bachelor’s degrees slated for elimination include international studies, chemistry, Spanish and multiple mathematics programs. It will also cut a graduate leadership degree focused on outdoor expeditions.

    Some programs originally considered for elimination — such as creative writing and economics — will go on with restructured curricula and face additional review in coming years. 

    The plan will also restructure SOU’s honors college and eliminate direct funding for its annual creativity conference.

    During Friday’s meeting, board member Debra Fee Jing Lee supported the cuts, arguing SOU‘s strength moving forward will be based on its ability “to be lean and agile and entrepreneurial.”​​

    Board member Elizabeth Shelby similarly voted for the proposal.

    “It’s incumbent upon us to plan as we must for the next several years, even if that requires additional cuts,” she said.

    But Hala Schepmann, a board member and chair of SOU’s chemistry and physics department, opposed the plan, calling it “the nuclear option.”

    “Do we need to make immediate cuts? Yes,” she said. “But taking away key foundational components of our institution will make it harder for us to make progress.”

    Schepmann also took issue with deciding on the plan amid “significant fluctuations” in the university’s projected budget.

    This summer, SOU lowered projections for its expected revenue by $1.9 million after an internal analysis found “a multi-decade issue” of double-counting some online education tuition revenue.

    The workforce reduction comes just two years after SOU eliminated nearly 82 full-time positions through a combination of layoffs, unfilled vacancies, voluntary reductions and retirements. 

    That wave of cuts left the remaining employees “feeling as though they were asked to do more with less,” according to the proposal. It argued that the new round of cuts will address this issue by paring down programs in tandem with shrinking the workforce.

    Source link

  • Nike Co-Founder Gives $2B to Oregon Cancer Institute

    Nike Co-Founder Gives $2B to Oregon Cancer Institute

    The Oregon Health & Science University will receive a $2 billion gift from Nike co-founder Phil Knight and his wife, Penny, to support the eponymous Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU announced last week.

    It is the largest single donation ever made to a U.S. university-affiliated health center and is intended to promote the integration of cancer diagnostics, treatment and patient care.

    The gift will allow the cancer institute to become self-governed within OHSU. It will have its own board of directors under the leadership of Brian Druker, a leukemia researcher who has worked closely with the Knights and who helped develop a drug that vastly improved the life span of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

    “This gift is an unprecedented investment in the millions of lives burdened with cancer, especially patients and families here in Oregon,” said OHSU president Shereef Elnahal. “It is also a signal of trust in the superlative work that our clinicians, researchers and teammates at the Knight Cancer Institute do every day. Dr. Druker’s vision around a multidisciplinary system of care—focused squarely on making the patient’s experience seamless from the moment they receive a diagnosis—will now become reality. And thanks to the extraordinary generosity of Mr. and Mrs. Knight, Oregon will be the place to do it.” 

    The Knights have been key benefactors of the cancer institute. In 2013 they vowed to donate $500 million if the university could match the funds within two years—which it did, thanks to $200 million in bonds from the Oregon Legislature, $100 million from Columbia Sportswear chair Gert Boyle and assorted donations from some 10,000 individuals from all 50 states and 15 countries. 

    Source link

  • Colonialism-Defending Professor Settles With U of Oregon

    Colonialism-Defending Professor Settles With U of Oregon

    A professor who’s long been controversial for defending colonialism has settled the lawsuit he filed more than two years ago against a former communication manager at the University of Oregon who blocked him from interacting with a university account on Twitter.

    Bruce Gilley—a Portland State University politics and global affairs professor currently serving a stint as A Presidential Scholar in Residence at New College of Florida—filed the lawsuit in August 2022 a former communication manager for the University of Oregon’s Division of Equity and Inclusion.

    Gilley alleged that the Equity and Inclusion Twitter account published a post urging people to “interrupt racism,” suggesting they use this line: “It sounded like you just said [blank]. Is that really what you meant?” Gilley said he was blocked by the account after retweeting the post with the caption “My entry: … you just said ‘all men are created equal.’”

    Gilley and the University of Oregon reached a settlement agreement last week in which the institution admitted the communication manager blocked Gilley. The university agreed in the settlement that its insurer would pay from $95,000 to $382,000 in attorneys’ fees to Gilley’s representatives—the Institute for Free Speech and the Angus Lee Law Firm—and the institution further agreed to a detailed process to clarify its social media policies and train social media managers on them. There will be an email address for people to complain about being blocked, and the whole plan will have a 180-day supervision period for implementation.

    “The guidelines will more clearly state that third parties and the content they post must not be blocked or deleted based on viewpoint, even if that viewpoint can be viewed by some as ‘offensive,’ ‘racist’ or ‘hateful,’” the settlement agreement says.

    In a statement, the university said it “does not agree that it committed any of the violations alleged in Bruce Gilley’s complaint. The agreement reached between the university and Mr. Gilley ended the lawsuit without admission of liability or fault.”

    Source link

  • Support the Mission of the University of Oregon (United Academics of the University of Oregon)

    Support the Mission of the University of Oregon (United Academics of the University of Oregon)

    Tuition has increased faster than
    inflation. State funding has increased faster than inflation.
    Administrator salaries have increased faster than inflation. Yet, the
    administration is demanding that the teachers, librarians, and
    researchers who drive the university’s educational mission take real
    wage cuts. 

    While everyone acknowledges the
    financial challenges facing higher education, the UO is receiving more
    money per student than ever before. If this money isn’t going toward
    student education and knowledge creation, where is it going?

    The Facts:

    Quality Education Requires Investment in Faculty

    The value of a University of Oregon degree depends on the quality of
    its professors, instructors, researchers, and librarians. When faculty
    wages erode due to artificial austerity, neglect, or slow attrition, it
    affects not only the quality of education and research, but also the
    long-term value of a UO degree for students and alumni alike.

    • UO faculty salaries rank near the bottom among our peer institutions in the American Association of Universities (AAU).
    • United Academics has proposed fair wage increases that would merely adjust salaries for inflation and restore them to pre-pandemic budget levels.
    • Despite pandemic-related learning loss, the administration is spending less on education per student (adjusted for inflation) than before COVID-19.
    • The administration has prioritized administrative growth over academic excellence, while faculty have taken on increased workloads since the pandemic.

    Faculty Sacrificed to Protect UO—Now It’s Time for Fair Wages

    During the pandemic, faculty agreed to potential pay reductions to
    help UO weather an uncertain financial future. We made sacrifices to
    ensure the university could continue to serve students. Now, as we
    bargain our first post-pandemic contract, the administration refuses to
    offer wage increases that:

    • Cover inflation
    • Acknowledge additional faculty labor since the pandemic
    • Recognize our unwavering commitment to UO’s educational mission

    Our Vision for UO: Excellence in Teaching & Research

    The University of Oregon’s mission is clear:

    “The University of Oregon is a comprehensive public research
    university committed to exceptional teaching, discovery, and service. We
    work at a human scale to generate big ideas. As a community of
    scholars, we help individuals question critically, think logically,
    reason effectively, communicate clearly, act creatively, and live
    ethically.”

    Our vision for the University of Oregon is one where the educational
    and research mission are at the fore; an institution of higher learning
    where we attract and maintain the best researchers and instructors and
    provide a world class education for the citizens of Oregon and beyond.
    Yes, this will take a shift in economic priorities, but only back to
    those before the pandemic. Our demands are neither extravagant nor
    frivolous. Our demand is that the fiduciaries of the University of
    Oregon perform their primary fiduciary duty: support the mission of the
    University of Oregon.

    Why This Matters Now

    We are currently in state-mandated mediation, a final step before a
    potential faculty strike. Striking is a last resort—faculty do not want
    to disrupt student learning. However, the administration’s arguments for
    austerity do not align with the university’s financial situation or
    acknowledge the increased faculty labor and inflated economic reality
    since the pandemic. If the administration does not relent, we may have
    no choice but to strike.

    We Need Your Support

    A strong show of support from the UO community—students, parents,
    alumni, donors, legislators and citizens of Oregon and beyond—can help
    pressure the administration to do the right thing. 

    Sign our Community Support Letter

    Source link