Tag: Public

  • Public Confidence in Higher Ed Growing

    Public Confidence in Higher Ed Growing

    Jumping Rocks/Universal Images Group/Getty Images

    Despite the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on colleges and universities, American confidence in higher education is growing.

    According to a poll the Vanderbilt Project on Unity and American Democracy published Thursday, 47 percent of 1,030 Americans surveyed said they have “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in higher education institutions, with a net positive rating of 33—up 13 percentage points since 2023. Survey respondents reported more confidence in higher education than in the police (44 percent), the medical system (38 percent) and large tech companies (25 percent).

    Those findings echo the results of two recent polls—one by New America and another by Gallup and the Lumina Foundation. The latter showed that 42 percent of Americans said they have a “great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in higher education, compared to a low of 36 percent in 2024 and 2023.

    But like those polls, Vanderbilt’s showed partisan divides.

    While 69 percent of Democrats said they were confident in higher education, only 35 percent of Republicans said the same; just 24 percent of respondents who identify with Trump’s Make America Great Again movement expressed confidence. However, the vast majority (78 percent) of people surveyed said a college education is “very” or “somewhat” important for a young person to succeed, including 87 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of Republicans.

    “While the conventional wisdom may suggest that support for colleges and universities is low, it’s important to highlight that most Americans view higher education as a net positive for society, and its support has actually increased from the low levels we saw in 2023 and 2024,” Josh Clinton, co-director of the Vanderbilt poll, said in a news release. “Yes, there are real concerns—most people think affordability is a major problem, and many perceive colleges and universities as having a partisan slant—but that’s very different from widespread opposition to the idea of higher education itself.”

    Fifty-six percent of people surveyed believe that colleges and universities conduct scientific and medical research that saves lives, but only 14 percent said they remain as affordable as possible. The majority (67 percent) also cited political bias on campuses as a serious problem, though Democrats (54 percent) were less likely to agree than Republicans (79 percent), especially those who identified with the MAGA movement (91 percent).

    Nearly three-quarters (71 percent) of respondents said universities should refrain from taking official stances on political issues, including 83 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of Democrats.

    Source link

  • Quebec is threatening to outlaw public prayer

    Quebec is threatening to outlaw public prayer

    Last year, FIRE launched the Free Speech Dispatch, a regular series covering new and continuing censorship trends and challenges around the world. Our goal is to help readers better understand the global context of free expression. Want to make sure you don’t miss an update? Sign up for our newsletter


    Quebec secularism minister may ‘strengthen secularism’ by banning public prayer

    There doesn’t need to be a tension between secularism, free expression, and freedom of religion. Governments should ensure people are neither forced to adopt, nor abandon, religious views at the whims of the state. But Quebec is pursuing a different route, with the province’s Secularism Minister’s repeat public promises to ban public prayer. 

    The details of Jean-François Roberge’s planned legislation are not yet available but he has cited his “mandate to strengthen secularism” as a reason he’ll be introducing a bill to ban prayer in public places this fall. Roberge’s commitment follows earlier comments from Premier François Legault that “[w]hen we want to pray, we go to a church, we go to a mosque, but not in public places.” Legault also specifically mentioned Islamic prayer as a target. 

    Alarming new legislation in Canada, worsening repression in Hong Kong, and online global takedowns emerging from India

    Alarming new legislation in Canada, worsening repression in Hong Kong, and online global takedowns emerging from India.


    Read More

    Enforcing neutral limits on public activity to ensure traffic isn’t disrupted, for example, would be one thing. But public comments by Quebec officials thus far have suggested this effort to enforce secularism in public spaces will be much broader and limit what religious expression can be conveyed outside the confines of houses of worship. 

    There’s other free speech news out of Canada, too. At Techdirt, Mike Masnick reports that on the other side of the country, the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal issued a troubling $72,000 fine against X because it geo-blocked, rather than globally blocked, non-consensual intimate images the tribunal ordered to be taken down. As Masnick points out, it’s part of a growing broader challenge on the global internet where courts and officials are ordering extra-terroritorial takedowns — can one country censor the internet for everyone? As FIRE wrote about last year, Australia’s eSafety commissioner made a similar attempt to globally remove a video on X of a man stabbing a bishop.

    And Kneecap, the Irish rap trio that’s faced controversy and even police investigation in the UK for band members’ speech about Israel, Hamas, and Hezbollah, has been banned from entering Canada. Parliamentary Secretary for Combating Crime Vince Gasparro cited their “hate speech” and “glorification of terrorism” that “are contrary to Canadian values and laws” as the reason.

    Latest from the UK: Graham Linehan, Palestine Action, and Epstein projection arrests during Trump’s visit

    • It seems the UK’s free speech woes are making headlines every week, but that was especially true with the arrest of Graham Linehan, who was detained by five officers when he arrived in Heathrow Airport from Arizona earlier this month. Linehan was arrested for a series of posts on X, including one where he said if “a trans-identified male is in a female only space…call the cops, and if all else fails, punch him in the balls.” As my colleague Jacob Mchangama explained about the arrest, “a provocative tweet from more than four months ago suggesting that someone ‘punch’ others in a hypothetical situation does not meet any meaningful threshold of incitement (imminent or not).”
    • Public attention on the UK’s average of 30 arrests a day for online expression may be hitting its mark. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said in comments in the Commons that “there is a line between content that is offensive, rude, ill-mannered, and incitement to violence, incitement to hatred.” She added that “it is important that we police that line between these types of comments effectively, so that everybody in this country can have confidence in our policing system, but also confidence in exercising their rights under the law of our land.” Her words follow remarks from Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, who said “I don’t believe we should be policing toxic culture wars debates and officers are currently in an impossible position.”
    • The mass arrests of protesters who “express support” — to be clear, just through words — for banned group Palestine Action continue full steam ahead. In one weekend this month, police arrested over 400 protesters, some of whom were taken in just for holding signs reading, “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.” Protest organizers were also charged.
    • President Trump, fresh off threatening to set the U.S. Department of Justice on people who engage in so-called “hate speech” against him, was at the center of some speech controversies during his visit to the UK last week. First, four activists were arrested after projecting, without permission, images of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein onto Windsor Castle. The statute under which they were arrested should certainly raise eyebrows. They were taken in for suspicion of “malicious communications,” which targets “indecent or grossly offensive” messages intended to “cause distress or anxiety to the recipient.” Similarly, activists cried foul when police stopped them from driving an advertising van featuring images of Trump and Epstein through Windsor, where the president was staying. 

    Blasphemy news: Nigerian mob executes alleged offender, and Moroccan feminist found guilty

    As I write about regularly at the Free Speech Dispatch, blasphemy is not only still a criminal act in dozens of countries, but an offense for which the allegation alone can sometimes result in a public killing — no judge, no jury, just executioners. So was the case in Nigeria weeks ago when a mob executed a woman by burning her to death after she was accused of blaspheming against the Prophet Muhammad. The victim, a food vendor, was accused of making a blasphemous remark after “a man jokingly proposed marriage” to her.

    And Moroccan feminist Ibtissam Lachgar, whose arrest I discussed in the last Dispatch, was found guilty and sentenced to two and a half years in prison, along with a $5,000 fine, for blasphemy after posting a photo of herself wearing a shirt with the message, “Allah is Lesbian.”

    Chinese mining company weaponizes cybercrime law against Sierra Leone journalist 

    Chinese-owned mining company Leone Rock Metal Group filed a complaint with Sierra Leone’s Criminal Investigation Department against editor Thomas Dixon after he published an investigation alleging labor violations at the company. Dixon was detained and interrogated for hours on charges of “cyberbullying and stalking.” He also says the company “offered to drop its complaint if he agreed never to report on the company again—a condition he flatly rejected.” Another journalist was detained on similar charges just after Dixon was released on bail.

    China’s censorship goes global — from secret police stations to video games

    2025 is off to a repressive start, from secret police stations in New York to persecution in Russia, Kenya, and more.


    Read More

    Rapid free speech developments all across Asia

    • Singapore’s Home Affairs and Law Minister Kasiviswanathan Shanmugam, who is and also coordinating minister for National Security, and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng are suing Online Citizen editor Terry Xu — and attempting to get a court in Taiwan, where Xu lives, to intervene. They’re suing over Xu’s reporting on Singapore’s luxury property market.
    • India’s Supreme Court ordered content creators to apologize for mocking disabilities in their online content. “Influencers commercialise speech. When a speech falls in the ambit of commercial or prohibitive categories, the immunity under right to free speech is not available,” the justices said.
    • Cambodia’s National Assembly unanimously passed legislation allowing those who “collude” with foreign forces or are involved in “destruction of sovereignty, territorial integrity and national security” to be stripped of citizenship. Rights groups said it “will have a disastrously chilling effect on the freedom of speech of all Cambodian citizens.”
    • American comedian Sammy Obeid is alleging that shows he planned to hold in Singapore were canceled because the Infocomm Media Development Authority wouldn’t issue him the permits over the content of his comedy. IMDA said it wouldn’t issue the permits because Obeid submitted them too late — but Obeid claims the delays were ultimately because of issues with his script discussing Israel in the show. And under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act, Obeid has also been ordered to carry corrections to social media posts accusing Singapore of censorship over the incident.
    • The Chinese government has had a busy month of international art censorship. Weeks after successfully pressuring a Thai art gallery to censor an exhibit criticizing authoritarian governments, Chinese officials also pushed back against a Taiwanese art exhibit at the Republic of Kazakhstan’s Central State Museum. The day before the show was set to open “the museum abruptly announced that it would begin a one-month renovation.”
    • Bihar police arrested a 20-year-old man for using “abusive language” against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a political rally.
    • Hong Kong’s schools must now review details of activities held by all outside organizations and individuals, as well as the backgrounds of the organizers and guests, to ensure they “do not involve contents that endanger national security, nor promote political propaganda and improper values.” 

    Hong Kong, free speech, and what musing about sci-fi can teach us

    • Indonesian officers have arrested thousands of protesters in recent weeks who demonstrated against President Prabowo Subianto Djojohadikusumo’s policies. The protests broadened “when an armored police vehicle hit and killed a rideshare driver.”
    • Nepal is still reeling after mass protests in response to government corruption and unpopular policies, including a short-lived ban on social media platforms. Dozens were killed in the protests and the Prime Minister has since resigned and not been seen publicly.
    • The full and total silencing of women under the Taliban continues. Now, books written by women are banned from Afghanistan’s higher education system.
    • Punishment under Thailand’s ban on criticism or mockery of the royal family,  lese-majeste, continues to crush political dissent in the country. People’s Party MP Chonthicha Jangrew was sentenced to two years and eight months for Facebook posts that “insulted the monarchy, incited social conflict and threatened national security.” Influencer Aniwat Prathumthin was given a suspended sentence for years old Facebook posts and, as part of her sentence, must complete community service on royal holidays. But there was some positive news: Anchan Preelert, a Thai woman who was sentenced to a shocking 43 years for lese-majeste in 2021, was pardoned and freed last month.

    Powerful Israeli minister to cut funding for awards event over winning film’s content

    Miki Zohar, Israel’s culture and sports minister, has promised to revoke funding for the Ophir Awards after “The Sea,” an “Arabic-language drama about a Palestinian boy from the West Bank who risks his life to go to the beach in Tel Aviv,” won the top prize. Zohar says the Ophir ceremony, for which film awards are voted on by the Israeli Academy of Film and Television, “spit in the face of Israeli citizens” and that “The Sea” portrays Israeli soldiers “in a defamatory and false way.”

    It’s been a bad month for free speech, basically everywhere. But there is good news.

    Egyptian-British writer and human rights activist Alaa Abd el-Fattah has been in prison in Egypt since 2019 for “spreading false news and harming Egypt’s national interest” after sharing a social media post about a prisoner’s death. But after years of campaigning from activists and his family — including his mother, who has undergone multiple hunger strikes — Abd el-Fattah will be freed after a pardon from Egyptian president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. 

    Source link

  • LAWSUIT: Texas bans the First Amendment at public universities after dark

    LAWSUIT: Texas bans the First Amendment at public universities after dark

    AUSTIN, Texas, Sept. 3, 2025 — The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression filed a lawsuit today to stop enforcement of a new, unconstitutional law that turns every public university in Texas into a speech-free zone starting at 10 p.m. every day. FIRE is suing the University of Texas System on behalf of student musicians, journalists, political organizers, and religious students who span the ideological spectrum, all of whom the new Texas law threatens to silence.

    “The First Amendment doesn’t set when the sun goes down,” said FIRE senior supervising attorney JT Morris. “University students have expressive freedom whether it’s midnight or midday, and Texas can’t just legislate those constitutional protections out of existence.”

    In 2019, Texas was a national leader in protecting student speech, passing a robust law enshrining free speech on public university campuses. But after a series of high-profile protests over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in 2024, the Texas legislature reversed course and passed Senate Bill 2972, transforming the speech-protective 2019 law into one mandating that the state’s public universities and colleges impose a host of sweeping censorship measures.

    FIRE’s lawsuit is challenging two major provisions of the law, which went into effect on Sept. 1. The first requires public universities in Texas to ban all “expressive activities” on campus between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m., which the law defines as “any speech or expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.”

    That is a shocking prohibition of protected speech at public universities. Under the new law, universities now have the power to discipline students at nighttime for wearing a hat with a political message, playing music, writing an op-ed, attending candlelight vigils — even just chatting with friends.

    “This law gives campus administrators a blank check to punish speech, and that authority will inevitably be used to target unpopular speech,” said FIRE attorney Adam Steinbaugh. “Administrators have plenty of ways to prevent disruptive conduct that do not involve such a broad censorship mandate.”

    FIRE is also challenging the law’s mandate that universities ban student groups from a host of protected expression during the last two weeks of any semester or term, including inviting guest speakers, using amplified sound, or playing a drum. The Fellowship of Christian University Students at UT-Dallas, for example, would be unable to invite an off-campus minister to lead a prayer during finals.

    “Our organization gives students on campus a place to worship with one another and hear from Christian leaders,” said FOCUS committee chair Juke Matthews. “For many of them, this is their church away from home. This law would yank away part of their support system right at the most stressful time of the term.”

    COURTESY PHOTOS OF STUDENT CLIENTS FOR MEDIA USE

    If state officials and campus administrators want to regulate disruptive speech, the First Amendment demands that they narrowly tailor any such regulation. But Texas’ blanket ban makes no distinctions about the noise level or location of the expression. The Texas law would permit a tuba concert during finals weeks, but not one with drums. And the law exempts “commercial speech” from its sweeping bans on speech. So Texas students are free to advertise t-shirts featuring the First Amendment after hours… but could face discipline for wearing them.

    FIRE is suing on behalf of a diverse group of students and student organizations whose speech the new Texas law will harm. Along with the UT-Dallas chapter of FOCUS, other plaintiffs include:

    • Young Americans for Liberty is an Austin-based national grassroots organization for students who want to advance the cause of liberty. Many of their student members at Texas universities engage in protests, petitions, and “Free Speech Balls” that traditionally take place during evening hours. FIRE is also representing an individual YAL member who attends UT-Austin and would personally face punishment for inviting YAL speakers in the final weeks of term or for sharing his political opinions at the wrong hour.
    • The Society of Unconventional Drummers is a registered student organization at UT-Austin that puts on performances throughout the term, including at the end of each semester. Texas’s arbitrary rule banning percussion the last two weeks of any semester would force the students to cancel one of their most popular shows.
    • Strings Attached is a student music group that holds public performances on UT-Dallas’s campus, including in the final two weeks of term. Some of their concerts take place after hours or during the day with sound amplification, both of which could fall afoul of the Texas law’s sweeping bans.
    • The Retrograde is a new, independent student newspaper that serves the UT-Dallas community. Whether it’s writing a story, emailing sources, editing a column, much of its staff’s newsgathering and reporting necessarily happens after Texas’ 10 p.m. free speech cutoff.

    “Under these new rules, we’re at risk of being shut down simply for posting breaking news as it happens,” said Retrograde Editor-in-Chief Gregorio Olivares. “With that threat hanging over our heads, many student journalists across the UT system face the impossible decision between self-censorship and running a story that criticizes the powers on campus.”

    FIRE’s clients will ask the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent UT’s new speech bans from taking effect. The defendants in the lawsuit include the members of the UT System Board of Regents, UT System Chancellor John M. Zerwas, UT-Austin President Jim Davis, and UT-Dallas President Prabhas V. Moghe.


    The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought—the most essential qualities of liberty. FIRE recognizes that colleges and universities play a vital role in preserving free thought within a free society. To this end, we place a special emphasis on defending the individual rights of students and faculty members on our nation’s campuses, including freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience.

    CONTACT:

    Alex Griswold, Communications Campaign Manager, FIRE: 215-717-3473; [email protected]



    Source link

  • One-third of U.S. public schools screen students for mental health

    One-third of U.S. public schools screen students for mental health

    This press release originally appeared on the RAND site.

    Key points:

    Nearly one-third of the nation’s K-12 U.S. public schools mandate mental health screening for students, with most offering in-person treatment or referral to a community mental health professional if a student is identified as having depression or anxiety, according to a new study.

    About 40 percent of principals surveyed said it was very hard or somewhat hard to ensure that students receive appropriate care, while 38 percent said it was easy or very easy to find adequate care for students. The findings are published in the journal JAMA Network Open.

    “Our results suggest that there are multiple barriers to mental health screening in schools, including a lack of resources and knowledge of screening mechanics, as well as concerns about increased workload of identifying students,” said Jonathan Cantor, the study’s lead author and a policy researcher at RAND, a nonprofit research organization.

    In 2021, the U.S. Surgeon General declared a youth mental health emergency. Researchers say that public schools are strategic resources for screening, treatment, and referral for mental health services for young people who face barriers in other settings.

    Researchers wanted to understand screening for mental health at U.S. public schools, given increased concerns about youth mental health following the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    In October 2024, the RAND study surveyed 1,019 principals who participate in the RAND American School Leader panel, a nationally representative sample of K–12 public school principals.

    They were asked whether their school mandated screening for mental health issues, what steps are taken if a student is identified as having depression or anxiety, and how easy or difficult it is to ensure that such students received adequate services.

    Researchers found that 30.5 percent of responding principals said their school required screening of students with mental health problems, with nearly 80 percent reporting that parents typically are notified if students screen positive for depression or anxiety.

    More than 70 percent of principals reported that their school offers in-person treatment for students who screen positive, while 53 percent of principals said they may refer a student to a community mental health care professional.

    The study found higher rates of mental health screenings in schools with 450 or more students and in districts with mostly racial and ethnic minority groups as the student populations.

    “Policies that promote federal and state funding for school mental health, reimbursement for school-based mental health screening, and adequate school mental health staff ratios may increase screening rates and increase the likelihood of successfully connecting the student to treatment,” Cantor said.

    Support for the study was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health.

    Other authors of the study are Ryan K. McBainAaron KofnerJoshua Breslau, and Bradley D. Stein, all of RAND; Jacquelin Rankine of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Fang Zhang, Hao Yu, and Alyssa Burnett, all of the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute; and Ateev Mehrotra of the Brown University School of Public Health.

    RAND Health Care promotes healthier societies by improving health care systems in the United States and other countries.

    eSchool News Staff
    Latest posts by eSchool News Staff (see all)

    Source link

  • Indianapolis Public Schools to Transfer Two Closed School Buildings to Settle Legal Battle – The 74

    Indianapolis Public Schools to Transfer Two Closed School Buildings to Settle Legal Battle – The 74


    Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

    Indianapolis Public Schools will put one closed school building up for lease or sale to charter schools for $1 and will sell another to a local nonprofit, the district announced Friday.

    The transfer of the buildings that used to house Raymond Brandes School 65 and Francis Bellamy School 102 stems from an Indiana Court of Appeals ruling in a lengthy battle over the state’s so-called $1 law, which requires districts to transfer unused school buildings to charter schools for the sale or lease price of $1. The court ruled in May that IPS must sell School 65.

    The announcement also comes as the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance ponders how to solve facility challenges for both IPS, which continues to lose students in its traditional schools every year, and charters, which frequently struggle to acquire school buildings.

    The district said in a statement that Damar Charter Academy, a school for students with developmental and behavioral challenges in Decatur Township, had reached out to IPS to express interest in School 65 — which is located on the southeast side of IPS. The district does not have the power to pick which charter school it will sell a building to — if more than one charter school is interested, state law requires a committee to decide.

    On Monday, Damar confirmed to Chalkbeat that it is interested in School 65.

    In the statement, the district said it would prefer to “move forward with disposition” of School 65 through a collaborative community process.

    “But, we respect the court’s decision and will proceed in full compliance with that order,” IPS Superintendent Aleesia Johnson said. “If the building is claimed by a charter school, we think Damar has a strong record of serving some of the most vulnerable and underserved students in our city and I have confidence that acquiring Raymond Brandes will allow them to expand their operations to serve even more students.”

    Meanwhile, the district will sell School 102 to Voices, a nonprofit that works with youth, for $550,000. The district had already leased the school on the Far Eastside to Voices, which also shares the space with two other youth programs.

    “Indianapolis Public Schools is committed to continuing to engage with our community on thoughtful re-use of our facilities and to being good stewards of our public assets,” Johnson said in a statement. “We are excited to move forward with our planned sale of the Francis Bellamy 102 building to VOICES and to see their impact in serving our community continue for many years into the future.”

    This story was originally published on Chalkbeat. Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news site covering educational change in public schools.


    Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

    Source link

  • Broward County Public Schools faces enrollment drops, possible closures

    Broward County Public Schools faces enrollment drops, possible closures

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    Dive Brief:

    • Broward County Public Schools announced plans to “address” 34 of its 239 schools for possible closures or consolidations during a Tuesday board meeting. 
    • The pending plans come at a time when the large Florida district is reporting an enrollment decrease of 10,360 students, a count taken 10 days into the 2025-26 school year compared to the year prior. The district’s total enrollment, excluding charter schools, was 188,002 on Aug. 22.
    • The district also reported in July that 58 of its schools were below 70% capacity, including 39 elementary schools, 16 middle schools and 3 high schools.

    Dive Insight:

    As the sixth largest school district in the U.S., BCPS is not immune to a national trend of districts facing enrollment drops amid declining birthrates and growing school choice options.

    In a May survey of current and former BCPS parents conducted by Hanover Research, the data found that about half of respondents — 53% — said they enrolled their children in a nontraditional schooling option because they wanted higher quality instruction. A third of families also cited smaller class sizes and another third indicated the availability of more programs. The district surveyed 8,983 parents who either had a child enrolled, formerly enrolled, or partially enrolled in a BCPS school.

    The top two reasons parents said they unenrolled their children from BCPS was because they were dissatisfied with the district’s education quality (26%) and they were concerned about school safety (24%).  

    Among those who previously had a child enrolled or partially enrolled at BCPS, 20% said improved teacher quality through professional development would have made them more likely to stay. Some 18% also separately said better support for students with disabilities, improvements on handling school bullying, or strengthened safety and security measures would have encouraged them to keep their child in the district.

    To retain families, the district is being advised based on the parent survey results to:

    • Track school climate and culture outcomes for improvements.
    • Offer more college and career readiness support.
    • Provide more support to teachers to improve the district’s education quality.
    • Tackle school safety issues and work to reduce bullying and harassment.

    An August analysis by Bellwether, an education nonprofit, warns that more school closures and consolidation could be on the horizon in the coming months and years due to declining enrollment — ultimately leading to strained school budgets. Bellwether estimated that the total loss in revenue from declining enrollment at the nation’s largest 100 districts could total up to $5.2 billion based on 2023-24 school enrollment. 

    Other large school districts recently weighing a number of school closures and consolidations as a result of declining enrollment include Atlanta Public Schools, Austin Independent School District in Texas and St. Louis Public Schools.

    Source link

  • How Do We Rebuild Public Trust in Higher Education? Together

    How Do We Rebuild Public Trust in Higher Education? Together

    A recent Lumina–Gallup poll offers a rare piece of good news: public confidence in higher education has ticked up from a recent low of 36% to 43%. While the rebound is modest, it breaks a years-long narrative of decline, and it’s worth asking: What is driving renewed trust?

    Drs. Julie Posselt and Adrianna Kezar Respondents pointed to three factors: quality of education, opportunities for graduates, and innovation. In other words, the public is telling us that when we deliver tangible value—educational excellence, new opportunities, and forward-looking ideas—trust grows.

    At the USC Rossier School of Education, this belief is guiding our next chapter. This month, we are merging the Pullias Center for Higher Education and the Center for Enrollment Research, Policy and Practice. Working collectively under the Pullias banner thanks to the generous bequest of the Earl and Pauline Pullias family, we are coming together to propel learning across decades of experience in research-practice partnerships. 

    The teams in our centers work with community colleges, school districts, nonprofits, businesses, government agencies, state higher education systems, and national associations. Though we love theory work as much as the next professors, we know theory’s greatest power is realized when tested and applied in the real world, in partnership with the communities we serve.

    Take the USC College Advising Corps. Through partnerships with public high schools across Los Angeles County, we place nearly 40 trained college advisers per year, most of them recent college graduates from across Southern California, into underresourced high schools. The result has been to support 10,000 high school seniors annually, with more than 88,000 first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented students helped since the program began more than a decade ago. This is the kind of scale, innovation, and equity-driven practice that the public recognizes and values.

    Our work to date and going forward will be defined as much by our approach. We partner with communities, connecting research directly to policy and practice to innovate on the systems that shape student access and success, from high school through graduate education and into the workforce. This work often means capacity building, institutional improvement, and student-centered design—not in theory alone, but in practice, in partnership, and at scale.

    Look around and you’ll find many more examples of people and organizations who inspire not just through individual excellence but also by deepening wells of mutual support and mutual investment. There are longstanding national examples such as Campus Compact, which brought together college presidents across the country to sign a declaration and create an organization focused on civic engagement; they have sponsored collaborative responses to crises and offer faculty development. That kind of solidarity is not typical, but to our minds it is increasingly valuable.

    Benjamin Franklin warned at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, “We must all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.” His words are as relevant to higher education today as it was to the Continental Congress. Our sector’s future depends on resisting the pull toward isolation and polarization, and instead modeling connection, mutual support, and shared purpose. 

    In a year certain to bring challenges, higher education must lead not from the top of the ivory tower, but from within networks of trust we build with the communities around us—of professionals and publics. For us, merging our centers is just one example of the belief that we are stronger together—intellectually, financially, and in service of the public good. We welcome connecting with you through your stories and examples of the same. 

     ____________

    Drs. Julie Posselt and Adrianna Kezar are Co-Directors of the Pullias Center for Higher Education at University of Southern California.

    Source link

  • Ohio State Restricts Decorations in Public Dorm Spaces

    Ohio State Restricts Decorations in Public Dorm Spaces

    Ohio State University has advised resident advisers to restrict all dorm floor and common room decor—as well as welcome programming for incoming students—to “Ohio State spirit themes” to avoid offending or alienating students. That means motifs like “retro video games and SpongeBob” motifs, which one outraged former RA on Reddit said they decorated with, won’t be allowed. 

    The move comes partly in response to SB1, a higher ed law Ohio passed in March that prohibits DEI, requires institutions to “demonstrate intellectual diversity” and mandates institutional neutrality on “controversial” subjects such as climate change, electoral politics, foreign policy, immigration, marriage and abortion.

    “SB1 was certainly a factor, but our goal is to create an open and welcoming environment for all students … including in our residence halls, as we build community throughout our spaces and programming,” Dave Isaacs, OSU communications and media relations manager, said in a statement shared with Inside Higher Ed. “And this was discussed with RAs during their orientation for the position.”

    Move-in activities are also required to be Buckeye-themed, including “necklace making and mug decorating,” the statement said.

    Students took to Reddit to pan the new decorating rules, with one commenter posting, “SB1 and university leadership has sucked the life out of literally everything.”

    “There were no comments supporting Ohio State’s decision,” the student newspaper, The Lantern, noted. “However, one user called on students to protest the state and national government over these decisions, rather than Ohio State’s administration.”

    Source link

  • Public Ill. Universities Will Provide Medication Abortions

    Public Ill. Universities Will Provide Medication Abortions

    Public colleges and universities in Illinois will now be required by law to supply contraception and abortion medication in the student health center or pharmacy, according to Illinois Public Media.

    Democratic governor JB Pritzker signed HB 3709 into law Friday, requiring colleges to supply birth control and medication abortions starting this academic year. Only three other states—California, Massachusetts and New York—currently have similar laws.

    The law was inspired in part by a student referendum at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign regarding whether the university health center should offer medication abortions. About three-quarters of the more than 6,000 undergraduates who voted were in favor of the idea, but the university didn’t implement the idea, saying it didn’t have the expertise to provide abortions.

    The governor also signed a bill increasing protections for abortion providers on the same day.

    Source link

  • Public Media Cuts Could Limit Students’ Career Exploration

    Public Media Cuts Could Limit Students’ Career Exploration

    Student journalists have their fingerprints on more than 282 public radio or television stations across the country, providing behind-the-scenes support, working as on-screen talent or reporting in their local communities for broadcast content. But over $1 billion in federal budget cuts could reduce their opportunities for work-based learning, mentorship and paid internships.

    About 13 percent of the 319 NPR or PBS affiliates analyzed in a report from the Center for Community News at the University of Vermont operate similarly to teaching hospitals in that a core goal of the organization is to train college students. Nearly 60 percent of the stations “provide intensive, regular and ongoing opportunities for college students” to intern or engage with the station.

    Scott Finn, news adviser and instructor at the Center for Community News and author of the report, worries that the cuts to public media and higher education more broadly could hinder experiential learning for college students, prompting a need for additional investment or new forms of partnerships between the two groups.

    In July, Congress rescinded $1.1 billion in federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds public media stations including NPR and PBS. The cuts threaten the financial stability of many stations, some of which are directly affiliated with colleges and universities.

    Working at a public media station provides a variety of benefits for students, Finn said. In his courses, Finn partners with community outlets that will publish students’ stories, depending on the quality and content, which he says motivates students to submit better work.

    “Being published, being broadcast is important. The whole focus of the exercise changes,” Finn said. “It’s not just trying to please me as the instructor or a tick box for a grade. They have real-world consequences. Their story will have an impact. It will move people, it will change policy, and that knowledge them inspires them to work harder.”

    Most students want internship opportunities; a recent study by Strada found students rate paid internships as the most valuable experience for improving their standing as a candidate for future jobs. But nationally, there’s a shortage of available, high-quality internships compared to the number of students interested in participating, according to a 2024 report from the Business–Higher Education Forum.

    A Handshake survey from earlier this year found 12 percent of students in the survey didn’t have an internship before finishing their degree, largely because they lacked the time or weren’t selected for one.

    For interns or students working directly in the studio, partnering alongside career journalists also gives them access to a professional network and a career field they may not otherwise engage in.

    But student journalists aren’t the only ones who lose out when internship programs are cut.

    Emily Reddy serves as news director at WPSU, a PBS/NPR member station in central Pennsylvania associated with Penn State University. Reddy hosts a handful of student reporting interns throughout the calendar year, training them to write, record and broadcast stories relevant to the community.

    “[Interns] bring an energy to the newsroom,” Reddy shared. “They’re enthusiastic. They are excited to go out to some board meeting that no one else wants to go to. They bring us stories that we wouldn’t know about otherwise.”

    WPSU uses a variety of funding sources to pay student interns, including endowed scholarships at the university and donated funds. But like many other stations, WPSU is facing its own cuts. Earlier this year, Penn State reduced funding to the station by $800,000, or around 9 percent of the station’s total budget. That resulted in a cut of $400,000 from CPB.

    In response, WPSU shrank its full-time head count, laying off five staff members and cutting hours for three. Roles vacated by retirements were left unfilled. In October, the station will lose around $1.3 million as a result of the federal cuts, though Reddy doesn’t know what the full impact will be on staffing.

    WPSU had planned to increase its internship offerings, and Reddy is still hopeful that will happen. However, the laid-off personnel were among those responsible for managing learners.

    “The big thing that I’m concerned about working with students is that you can’t just have the students; somebody has to train them, somebody has to edit them, somebody has to voice coach them and clean up their productions,” Reddy said.

    About 12 percent of the stations in the Center for Community News’s report don’t sponsor interns, and they pointed to budget cuts as a key reason why. For stations experiencing financial pressures, Finn hopes newsrooms find creative ways to keep students involved in creating stories, including classroom partnerships or faculty editors who trim and refine stories. Universities are uniquely positioned to assist in this work, Finn said, because they have more resources than public stations and have a strong motivation to place students in successful internship programs.

    “This is a really important time for universities to double down on their relationship with public media stations and not walk away from it,” Finn said. “A lot of [stations] are these underutilized resources, in terms of student engagement and student learning.”

    Finn also says alumni and other supporters of student learning and public media can help to fill in gaps in funding, whether that’s supporting a paid full-time faculty role to serve as a liaison between students and stations or to endow internship dollars.

    “If public media stations are important to student success, then university advancement has to embrace the public media station as a part of its mission and help raise money for it,” Finn said.

    Source link