Tag: Quran

  • In Quran burning conviction, UK judge uses violence against defendant as evidence of his guilt

    In Quran burning conviction, UK judge uses violence against defendant as evidence of his guilt

    Last year, FIRE launched the Free Speech Dispatch, a regular series covering new and continuing censorship trends and challenges around the world. Our goal is to help readers better understand the global context of free expression. Want to make sure you don’t miss an update? Sign up for our newsletter.


    Return of blasphemy prosecutions feared in the UK 

    On June 2, four months after West London resident Moussa Kadri attacked Kurdish-Armenian asylum seeker Hamit Coskun for burning a Quran, Westminster Magistrates’ Court found Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence and fined him £240 ($323). 

    Coskun ignited a new round of debate over blasphemy in the UK after burning a Quran outside London’s Turkish consulate and yelling “Fuck Islam” and “Islam is a religion of terrorism,” which he has since repeatedly claimed was a protest against “the Islamist government of Erdoğan,” Turkey’s president. In response, Kadri attacked him with a knife, knocked him to the ground, and kicked him while he was down.

    But there’s a particularly disturbing element to this case. Namely, the judge’s justification for the conviction. The “disorderly” nature of Coskun’s protest, the judge said, “is no better illustrated than by the fact that it led to serious public disorder involving him being assaulted by two different people.” 

    That’s right, a man’s violent attack on another was cited as evidence of the victim’s guilt.

    The UK was not alone in making blasphemy news in recent weeks. In Bangladesh, a 23-year-old was arrested under the country’s Cyber Security Act for “insulting” the Prophet Muhammad on Facebook. An Iranian court upheld a death sentence on blasphemy charges for the musician Tataloo. And Sweden may be facing yet another Quran burning controversy, but appears to be allowing it to proceed — for now.

    Political speech in the crosshairs around the world

    • Mayor Gilles Platret of French city Chalon-sur-Saone banned display of Palestine’s flag in the city this month as well as “all pro-Palestine demonstrations.”
    • Hungary delayed a vote on a bill that would allow punishment including bans on organizations judged to “threaten the sovereignty of Hungary by using foreign funding to influence public life.”
    • Istanbul prosecutors — continuing Turkey’s crusade against imprisoned Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, a rival of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan — banned use of Imamoglu’s image and audio recordings.
    • Israeli Education Minister Yoav Kisch threatened to revoke funding to universities where students have held Nakba rallies. “Academia is not a platform for incitement under the guise of freedom of expression,” he wrote.
    • Kneecap member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been charged with a terrorism offense by the UK Metropolitan Police for displaying a flag supporting Hezbollah at a concert in London last year.
    • The lese-majeste case against American academic Paul Chambers, accused of insulting Thailand’s monarchy, has officially been dropped. Chambers will return to the U.S.
    • Malaysian police are investigating a queer sexual health workshop for “causing disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will, or prejudicing the maintenance of harmony or unity, on grounds of religion.”
    • Georgian Dream, the ruling party of Georgia, says it’s taking action against “the filthiest phrases and insults” made against its party members from a so-called “externally funded hate speech campaign.”
    • Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad was arrested for social media posts about India’s tensions with Pakistan, including one about “those who are mindlessly advocating for war.”

    Eight year sentence for Brazilian comedian 

    A São Paulo state criminal court sentenced comedian Leo Lins to a whopping eight years and three months in prison for “practicing” or “inciting” racism and religious prejudice as well as for his comments about disabilities. The charges stemmed from a viral 2022 set in which Lins mocked “Black and Indigenous people, obese people, elderly people, gay people, Jews, northeastern Brazilians, evangelicals, disabled people and those with HIV.”

    “When there is a confrontation between the fundamental precept of liberty of expression and the principles of human dignity and judicial equality, the latter should win out,” the judge said of Lins’ sentencing. Lins intends to appeal.

    Free press under attack from Saudi Arabia to El Salvador to Samoa 

    • On June 14, Saudi Arabia executed journalist Turki Al-Jasser on treason and terrorism charges. Al-Jasser’s supporters claim the charges were in retaliation for the journalist’s criticism of Saudi royals. The Committee to Protect Journalists says the international community’s failure to act after Jamal Khashoggi’s murder “emboldened de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to continue his persecution of the press.”

      Jamal Khashoggi’s fiancé Hatice Cengiz looks at his photo as Nihad Awad of CAIR speaks about the murder during a demonstration at the Saudi Embassy, Washington DC, October 2021
    • Staff of an investigative news outlet in El Salvador, El Faro, fled the country in expectation of criminal charges after reporting that President Nayib Bukele’s party “paid gangs a quarter of a million dollars during his 2014 mayoral race for their help getting him votes in communities they controlled.”
    • An Argentinian investigative journalist is accusing the country’s intelligence services of approving a plan that would “allow agents to gather intelligence on journalists, economists, academics and other critics of President Javier Milei and his government.” The government denied the allegation “but acknowledged the existence of the document.”
    • A Kenyan author was arrested after President William Ruto’s daughter accused him of impersonation for writing a book about her without her permission.
    • Samoan journalist Lagi Keresoma was charged under a criminal defamation law over her article about a former police officer’s legal challenges. Press freedom advocates are pushing for the repeal of the criminal defamation statute, rightfully warning of its limits on journalists’ rights.
    • London BBC staff are raising the alarm over the Iranian government’s efforts to intimidate them within the UK, citing a “sharp and deeply troubling escalation” in Iran’s years-long campaign against them. Metropolitan Police said at least 20 people in London have been the target of violence and threats by Iran in recent years.

    The latest news in tech: Porn, bans, and Telegram

    • Six of Brazil’s 11 Supreme Court justices voted in favor of holding tech companies responsible for “illegal” third party content posted to their platforms but specifics on the enforcement and other details are still forthcoming. “We must, as a court, move in the direction of freedom with responsibility and regulated freedom, which is the only true freedom,” one judge said.
    • President Emmanuel Macron has committed to banning social media for children under 15, citing a recent murder in the country. “Platforms have the ability to verify age. Let’s do it,” he said.
    • And Pornhub warned it will no longer be available in France over recent age verification legislation.
    • Porn is a focus of government action in Tanzania, too. Information minister Jerry Silaa announced a block on the platform X over the presence of porn on the site, material he said is contrary to Tanzania’s “laws, culture, customs, and traditions.”
    • Vietnam ordered a block on Telegram, citing “anti-state” material available on the app and legal authority prohibiting “taking advantage of telecommunications activities to oppose the state.”
    • Transparency reports show that in the early months of 2025, Telegram handed law enforcement data on 22,777 users, a major jump from previous disclosures. 

    China’s censorship looks to the past — and abroad

    Unsurprisingly, the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre brought another wave of censorship in Hong Kong, which in previous years was home to mass demonstrations commemorating the date. But now even silent protests are criminalized, and self-censorship has soared. Police made some arrests, including “a man holding an electric candle, a man standing silently in the rain, and two women, including a girl holding flowers and dressed in a school uniform.” 

    Censorship of the Tiananmen anniversary is widespread online, too. Media outlet ABC obtained authorities’ 230-page Tiananmen censorship guide “used by frontline content censors to train artificial intelligence tools to moderate vast amounts of content.” A similar memo warned, “Delete first. Review later.”

    A candlelight vigil outside the Chinese consulate general in Los Angeles to mark the 36th anniversary of the crackdown on the pro-democracy protests in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, June 2025

    A candlelight vigil outside the Chinese consulate general in Los Angeles to mark the 36th anniversary of the crackdown on the pro-democracy protests in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, June 2025

    Amidst the censorship surrounding June 4, other national security-related threats emerged in Hong Kong. Joshua Wong, a pro-democracy activist already serving a nearly five-year prison sentence, was hit with new charges — while beyond bars. This month, he was charged with “conspiring to collude with foreign forces” for allegedly encouraging other nations to impose sanctions on Hong Kong in 2020. And the city’s police are warning residents that they too may face national security charges if they download “secessionist” mobile game Reversed Front: Bonfire, which allows users to play as targeted groups rising against the Chinese Communist Party. Even just recommending the game could qualify as “incitement to secession.”

    Censorship of disfavored political speech isn’t just a problem within China and Hong Kong — critics of the Chinese government face repression on a global scale. At Book World Prague, a Czech book fair, Chinese officials unsuccessfully pressured organizers to remove the Taiwanese flag from a publisher’s booth as well as censor a catalog that mentioned involvement by Taiwan’s Ministry of Culture. And here in the United States, two men, one from China and the other from the UK, are accused of stalking a U.S.-based man in an effort to prevent him from protesting Xi Jinping’s 2023 visit to California.

    Source link

  • Quran burner assassinated in Sweden — and another arrested in the UK

    Quran burner assassinated in Sweden — and another arrested in the UK

    Last year, FIRE launched the Free Speech Dispatch, a regular series covering new and continuing censorship trends and challenges around the world. Our goal is to help readers better understand the global context of free expression. Want to make sure you don’t miss an update? Sign up for our newsletter

    Blasphemers face arrest, the death penalty, and assassination

    (Jay Janner / Austin American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK)
    • Iraqi refugee Salwan Momika, known for his well-publicized and controversial public Quran burnings, was assassinated on Jan. 29 in Sweden. Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson suggested “there is obviously a risk that there is also a link to foreign power” involved. Days later, a Swedish court fined and issued a suspended sentence to Salwan Najem, another Iraqi refugee who burned Qurans with Momika, who was convicted of incitement against an ethnic group. The similar charges against Momika were dropped in light of his killing.
    • Greater Manchester Police arrested a man “on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence” for publicly burning a Quran and livestreaming the act in the UK. An assistant chief constable said police “made a swift arrest at the time and recognise the right people have for freedom of expression, but when this crosses into intimidation to cause harm or distress we will always look to take action when it is reported to us.” The arrest took place just two days after Momika was assassinated in Sweden.
    • Labour Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner will establish a council to create a government definition of “Islamophobia.” Depending on the council’s definition, and how it will or will not be implemented by government agencies responding to Islamophobia, it could implicate UK citizens’ ability to speak freely about important religious matters. 
    • Six men were sentenced to death for blasphemy in Pakistani courts late last month. All had been accused of posting blasphemous content on the internet.
    • Delhi police are investigating Washington Post columnist Rana Ayyub for social media posts sharing “anti-India sentiment” and insulting Hindu deities.
    • Iranian rapper Amir Hossein Maghsoudloo, known by Tataloo, was reportedly sentenced to death for blasphemy. He had previously been extradited from Turkey and sentenced to five years in prison before his case was reopened.

    Comedy and art crackdown in India

    Crowd of people carrying Hindu God Ganesha for immersion in water bodies during a festival

    Crowd of people carrying the Hindu God Ganesha for immersion in bodies of water during a festival in Amravati, Maharashtra, India, on Sept. 27, 2018 (Dipak Shelare / Shutterstock.com)

    In late January, a Delhi court gave the green light for police to seize two paintings by famous artist MF Husain from the Delhi Art Gallery. A complaint against the paintings, which “depicted Hindu gods Ganesha and Hanuman alongside nude female figures,” alleged they “hurt religious sentiments.” (Around the same time, local police in Texas also seized paintings. Fort Worth police entered the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth and took four decades-old photos from artist Sally Mann’s Diaries of Home installation showing her children nude. FIRE, the National Coalition Against Censorship, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas demanded an end to the censorship this week.)

    FIRE demands Fort Worth police return artwork confiscated from museum

    Press Release

    Government agents storming into a museum and taking down art isn’t the sort of thing that’s supposed to happen in America. But that’s exactly what happened in Fort Worth, Texas.


    Read More

    An even bigger media censorship controversy has bloomed since. In a recent episode of the YouTube show India’s Got Latent, comedian Ranveer Allahbadia joked, “Would you watch your parents have sex every day, or join in once and stop it forever?” To put it mildly, this did not go over well.

    In the days following the controversy, numerous censorship threats emerged. Mumbai police have summoned panelists on the show, and they may be facing numerous charges related to obscenity and insult. MP Naresh Mhaske called for greater regulation of online speech, and the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology is reportedly “considering recommending that the laws around digital content be made stricter.” YouTube has acted, too, taking down the video after receiving a notice from the Information and Broadcasting Ministry.

    This joke may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s a good example of how efforts to crack down on one incident of unpopular speech can balloon into a much greater censorship threat.

    New laws governing speech from Israel to Pakistan to Australia

    National flags of Pakistan and Israel

    • Late last month, Israel’s Knesset passed a law criminalizing denial of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel “with the intention of defending the terrorist organization Hamas and its partners, expressing sympathy for them, or identifying with them.” Offenders will be sentenced to five years in prison. The bill is modeled after legislation criminalizing Holocaust denial.
    • Pakistan’s new law governing online disinformation will punish intentional dissemination of material speakers have “reason to believe to be false or fake and likely to cause or create a sense of fear, panic or disorder or unrest.” Journalists protested the law, which will punish offenders with up to three years in prison.
    • Australia introduced mandatory minimum sentencing for some violent hate offenses, but also for the use of hate symbols or displays, like a Nazi salute. The Law Council of Australia objected to the changes, noting that “a person guilty of public display of prohibited symbols at a political protest would be subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 12 months imprisonment.”
    • Germany’s ban on “symbols of anti-constitutional organizations” is not new, but it certainly caught global attention last month. Police announced they were investigating protest groups’ projection onto a Tesla Gigafactory of the word “Heil” and an image of Elon Musk’s repeated gesture at President Trump’s inauguration rally, which police suggest violates the country’s ban on the Nazi salute.

    Sorry, DeepSeek can’t talk about that

    Smartphone displaying the Deepseek logo with the Chinese flag in the background

    A smartphone displaying the Deepseek logo with the Chinese flag in the background (Rokas Tenys / Shutterstock.com)

    AI company DeepSeek joins the list of Chinese tools and apps gaining a greater global footprint — but its users have discovered there are many things DeepSeek won’t say. As we’ve covered in previous Dispatch entries, tech developed by or with Chinese companies tends to come with some serious speech restrictions, and DeepSeek is no different. When asked some common sensitive questions about Chinese politics and history, DeepSeek offers this result: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.” Sometimes users can even see the program produce an answer before deleting it. It will, however, answer similarly sensitive questions about other countries’ histories.

    A busy few weeks of charges and sentencings

    • A Thai man already serving a record 50 years in prison on lese-majeste charges received yet another long sentence for insulting the monarchy in social media posts, bringing him to at least 59 years. Meanwhile, another activist received a two-year term on similar charges as well as Computer Crime Act violations for live-streaming from a protest.
    • Malaysia is targeting its royal critics, too. A 42-year-old man must pay a fine or serve a six-month sentence after being found guilty of posting “offensive and insulting” Instagram content about the monarchy.

    From the UK to Germany to Singapore: Police are watching what you post

    Blog

    Police detained a pro-Palestinian activist in London under the UK’s Terrorism Act for, as the arresting officer put it, “making a hate speech.”


    Read More

    • A Shanghai court sentenced documentary filmmaker Chen Pinlin to three and a half years for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” a charge commonly used against critics of the Chinese government. Chen had released a documentary about the country’s 2022 “White Paper” protests.
    • Police in India are investigating claims filed against politician Rahul Gandhi for “acts jeopardising India’s sovereignty, unity and integrity.” Gandhi accused the country’s BJP party of capturing all state institutions and said he was fighting against “the Indian state itself.”
    • Moroccan activist Said Ait Mahdi was fined and sentenced to three months in prison on charges including defamation for leading protests criticizing the government’s response to a deadly 2023 earthquake.
    • Turkish authorities are in the midst of yet another crackdown on civil society, with dozens of journalists, lawyers, and politicians investigated, arrested, or brought in for questioning by authorities in recent weeks.  
    • Kazakh authorities arrested blogger and satirist Temirlan Ensebek for “inciting interethnic discord” in an old online post — but won’t say which one.
    • The band Placebo’s Brian Molko has been charged with defamation for “contempt of the institutions” in Italy after calling Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni a “piece of shit, fascist, racist” during a 2023 music festival.

    Non-Crime Hate Incidents…in the U.S.? 

    Yellow Tape Showing Text "Police Line Do Not Cross" with police flashers in background

    The Free Beacon released a report late last month about “Bias Response Hotlines” popping up in cities and states across the United States — and these hotlines share some similarities with the UK’s controversial treatment of “non-crime hate incidents” (NCHIs). 

    In Maryland, for example, the attorney general’s office states on its website that “people who engage in bias incidents may eventually escalate into criminal behavior,” so “Maryland law enforcement agencies are required by law to record and report data on both hate crimes and bias incidents.” And in Philadelphia, authorities handling “hate incidents” can ask for identifying details, including exact addresses and names of the alleged offenders, and officials will in some cases “contact those accused of bias and request that they attend sensitivity training.”

    Readers of the Dispatch may recognize some overlap with the UK’s problematic NCHI system, where police create records of NCHIs based on complaints from members of the public accusing individuals, who are often not informed, of legal but hateful acts. The NCHI system is extensive, and it caught global attention late last year when Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson reported being visited by Essex Police for a year-old X post. Multiple police departments handled the case, and at least one flagged it as an NCHI. 

    For more about this and other recent debates about free speech in Europe, see my piece  from earlier this week on a 60 Minutes story detailing Germany’s speech policing and Vice President JD Vance’s speech at the Munich Security Conference.

    Women’s rights activist facing long jail term released in Saudi Arabia

    A still image of Salma al-Shehab from an interview she gave in 2014 at the Riyadh International Book Fair

    A still image of Salma al-Shehab from an interview she gave in 2014 at the Riyadh International Book Fair. (YouTube.com / Abdul Rahman Al-Saad)

    Let’s finish off with some good news. Salma al-Shehab, a 36-year-old mother of two and doctoral student at Leeds University, has been released from prison after more than four years, of which almost nine months were spent in solitary confinement. Al-Shehab’s ordeal reached a nadir in 2022 when an appeals court sentenced her to a shocking 34 years in prison for posting in support of women’s rights on social media. She used the internet to “cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security,” among other alleged crimes. 

    There are still some reasons to be concerned, however. Al-Shehab may still be restricted by a travel ban, and many unjustly imprisoned activists remain behind bars in Saudi Arabia.

    Source link