Tag: Stress

  • How a Northwestern Program Tackles Student Stress

    How a Northwestern Program Tackles Student Stress

    The stress of managing her engineering classes at Northwestern University didn’t just weigh on Fiona Letsinger mentally—it began to take a toll on her academic performance.

    In her second year, Letsinger’s dean introduced her to PATH, a peer mentor–led program housed in the engineering school that helps students manage stress, perfectionism and personal growth.

    “From the second he described it, my jaw was on the floor,” said Letsinger, a fourth-year civil engineering major. “I was like, ‘Yep—that’s exactly what I need.’”

    Launched in 2016, PATH—short for Personal Advancement Through Habits—is an eight-week program that guides students through reflection and personal development using a mix of online coursework and small-group discussions.

    During the 2024–25 school year, 88 students completed the program. About 90 percent reported a positive personal change, and more than 60 percent said they experienced growth in self-awareness; roughly half said it improved their motivation and goal-setting skills.

    Letsinger said the program gave her the language to recognize and name the ways stress and perfectionism were shaping her college experience.

    “I thought I couldn’t be a perfectionist because I wasn’t performing highly enough,” Letsinger said. “It wasn’t until PATH when I was able to get the vocabulary to identify how stress showed up in my life.”

    Impact on students: Joe Holtgrieve, assistant dean for undergraduate engineering, said his experience supporting students in both short-term and systemic crises inspired him to start the PATH program nearly 10 years ago.

    At the time, Holtgrieve said, Northwestern was reassessing its withdrawal policies and considering making it easier for students to drop courses later in the term. That prompted him to engage in difficult conversations with students about whether withdrawing was the best option—or whether they were experiencing what he calls an MOI, or “moment of intensity.”

    “How you respond is going to be really important for your future success and resilience,” said Holtgrieve, who remains a PATH faculty member. He added that students would later reach out to thank him because they performed better academically than they thought they would.

    Liz Daly, assistant director of academic advising and PATH faculty, said the program was originally intended for engineering students on academic probation but later expanded to include anyone feeling overwhelmed.

    “We had students who would request to take it again because they appreciated the community and the conversations that weren’t happening elsewhere on campus,” Daly said.

    That emphasis on reflection and peer support continued among students who participated in PATH during the 2024–25 school year.

    To better understand students’ experiences, Holtgrieve and Daly surveyed participants, asking them to reflect on their academic challenges and select three goals from a list of seven. More than half chose “shift mindset to embrace challenges, persist and learn from feedback.”

    Participants also completed surveys at the start and end of the program, rating which behaviors they found most challenging.

    Before starting PATH, more than half said they “dwelled on inadequacy after failure” and were “avoidant and/or withdrawn when things were going poorly.” By the program’s end, that number had dropped to about 15 percent.

    Daly said students often cite Holtgrieve’s “flashlight of attention” lesson as particularly helpful.

    “Our attention is like a flashlight … and whatever is illuminated by that light represents our awareness,” Holtgrieve said. “Where we shine that light represents our intention,” he added, noting that students’ intentions are often “yanked back and forth by crises, breaking news or self-critical narratives.”

    “If we can tune in to what’s present in the moment through our awareness and decide whether something is helpful or productive, then we can step back, understand the intention behind the attention that’s creating this awareness and adjust it,” he said.

    Letsinger agreed with Daly, saying this lesson was a game-changer in how she understood her own thinking.

    “I remember hearing that and immediately being like, ‘Yep, I need and want more of that kind of thinking,’” Letsinger said, adding that she not only enrolled in the program again the following quarter but later became a PATH mentor herself.

    What’s next: Holtgrieve and Daly said the program became so popular that other institutions have adapted it, including Smith College, which launched its own PATH-inspired program in fall 2020.

    Daly noted that in conversations about PATH’s impact, faculty and staff often asked whether they could participate as well. As a result, Holtgrieve and Daly now hold multiple sessions each year for Northwestern employees interested in learning strategies to manage stress in their own lives.

    Holtgrieve said that response suggests that many of the conversations happening among students also resonate with faculty and staff.

    “It’s an empathetic bridge, and it helps them to recognize that they’re struggling with some of the same things that their students are struggling with,” Holtgrieve said.

    Ultimately, Holtgrieve said, PATH is meant to help anyone practice responding to moments of uncertainty instead of trying to make them disappear.

    “When you’re feeling or confronting a moment where it’s not clear what to do, it’s human nature to say, ‘I want that to go away,’” Holtgrieve said. “But being able to practice living through and responding to those moments is how you build the skills to be a better person.”

    Get more content like this directly to your inbox. Subscribe here.

    Source link

  • College Search Help: 5 Ways to Find Your Perfect College Fit without Stress

    College Search Help: 5 Ways to Find Your Perfect College Fit without Stress

    If you’ve been scrolling “best colleges” lists and feeling more stressed than inspired, you’re not doing it wrong—you’re just starting in a place that’s designed to overwhelm you. Rankings can be interesting later, but they’re not a significant first step because they’re not personal. Your best match is the school that fits your life, learning style, and goals.

    Begin with a short list of non-negotiables. Think of these as the filters that keep you from wasting time on campuses that look impressive but don’t actually work for you.

    Here are common non-negotiables to choose from:

    • Distance from home: Staying in San Diego, somewhere in California, or open to out of state

    • Setting: big city, beach town, suburb, college town, rural

    • Campus size: small and intimate vs large and energetic

    • Budget range: realistic yearly cost after aid, not sticker price

    • Academic direction: undecided, specific major, pre-health, engineering, arts

    • Support needs: tutoring, advising, mental health resources, disability services

    • Culture: social scene, Greek life presence, faith-based options, commuter-friendly

    San Diego students often have a unique set of priorities—maybe you want to stay close to family, keep a part-time job, or find a campus that feels similar to the Southern California vibe. That’s not “limiting yourself.” That’s being strategic.

    Once you have your non-negotiables, add 3–5 “nice to haves.” Examples: study abroad strength, ocean access, strong internships in LA, guaranteed housing, smaller class sizes, or a campus with a big sports atmosphere.

    Your goal in this step is clarity. When you know what you need, the search gets calmer because you’re not trying to make every college work.

    Build a balanced list with a simple three-bucket system

    A lot of stress comes from an unbalanced list—either everything feels like a reach, or everything feels too safe, or you have 25 schools and no idea how to narrow it. A better approach is a list that’s intentionally built to give you strong options no matter what.

    Use a three-bucket system:

    • Likely: you’re confidently in range for admission, and you’d genuinely attend

    • Target: you’re competitive, and it’s a realistic match

    • Reach: admission is more selective or unpredictable, but it’s still worth a shot

    Try this ratio for a first draft:

    • 3–4 likely

    • 4–6 target

    • 2–3 reach

    If you’re applying in California, remember that some schools can be unpredictable even for strong students. That’s normal. The point of a balanced list is that you’re not placing your entire future on a few outcomes.

    To keep this step grounded, base your buckets on real indicators:

    • Recent admitted student averages (GPA ranges, course rigor, test policy if relevant)

    • Major-specific selectivity (some programs are more challenging to get into than the school overall)

    • Your transcript strength over time (upward trends matter)

    Then add one more filter: Would I actually be excited to attend if it’s the only option I get? If the answer is no, it doesn’t belong on the list.

    Research like a detective: look for proof, not vibes

    College fit scorecard and campus research materials used to compare schools and reduce stress during the college decision process.College fit scorecard and campus research materials used to compare schools and reduce stress during the college decision process.

    College marketing is excellent at making every campus feel perfect. Your job is to look for evidence that a school will support the life you want.

    Think of research in three layers:

    1: the basics

    • Majors and concentrations

    • Typical class sizes in your intended department

    • First-year requirements and flexibility to change majors

    • Housing policies and meal plans

    • Cost and financial aid clarity

    2: the student experience

    • Clubs and communities related to your interests

    • Support programs (first gen, transfer support, cultural centers)

    • Career services and internship pipelines

    • Safety and transportation, especially if you won’t have a car

    3: outcomes

    • Internship participation and where students intern

    • Job placement support, career fairs, and alumni networks

    • Graduate school acceptance support if that’s your path

    If you’re in San Diego or elsewhere in Southern California, you can also research a school through a local lens:

    • Does it connect to opportunities in San Diego, Orange County, or LA?

    • Are there strong relationships with regional employers?

    • Is it easy to travel home without stress?

    A practical tip: for each college, create a simple note with three headings:

    • Why it fits me

    • What I’m unsure about

    • What I need to confirm

    That turns “research” into a decision tool instead of endless scrolling.

    Make your campus visits smarter, even if you can’t travel far

    Not everyone can fly across the country to tour schools. The good news is you can get a clear sense of fit without spending a fortune.

    If you can visit in person, go in with a short plan:

    • Take a student-led tour

    • Sit in one class if possible

    • Walk through the neighborhood just off campus

    • Eat where students eat

    • Visit the department you care about (or attend an info session)

    Pay attention to things students rarely say out loud:

    • Are students staying on campus between classes or escaping to their cars?

    • Do people look comfortable, rushed, social, or stressed?

    • Does the campus feel navigable and safe for you?

    If you can’t visit, use “virtual proof”:

    • Student vlogs that show ordinary days (not the perfect highlight reel)

    • Online campus maps and walking tours

    • Department events or webinars

    • Student panels where you can ask questions live

    Southern California students sometimes underestimate how different campus life can feel outside the region. If you’re considering out-of-state, ask about the weather, housing during breaks, and travel logistics. Those details matter more than people admit, especially your first year.

    Compare colleges with a scorecard so decisions feel obvious

    Students walking on a palm tree lined campus walkway in Southern California, representing the college environment and campus life.Students walking on a palm tree lined campus walkway in Southern California, representing the college environment and campus life.

    When everything starts blending, stress spikes. A scorecard brings things back to reality.

    Create a simple rating system from 1 to 5 for categories that actually matter to you. Here are good categories:

    • Academic strength for your interests

    • Flexibility if you change your mind

    • Cost after aid and scholarship opportunities

    • Campus culture and community

    • Support and advising quality

    • Housing and day-to-day comfort

    • Career support and internships

    • Location fit (distance, vibe, weather, transportation)

    Then add two written prompts for each school:

    This is where you’ll notice patterns. One school might score slightly lower academically but feel far more supportive. Another might be impressive on paper but doesn’t offer the environment you need to do your best work.

    If you’re feeling torn between two schools, do a “real life week” test:
    Picture a typical Tuesday. What time do you wake up? How far do you walk? Where do you study? Who helps when you’re stuck? What happens when you’re homesick? The right fit usually becomes clearer when you stop imagining the highlight moments and start imagining the routine.

    Reduce stress with a simple timeline and decision plan

    The final stress trigger is not the search itself—it’s the feeling that you’re behind, or that one wrong decision will ruin everything. You can calm that down with an easy-to-follow plan.

    Here’s a simple structure that works well:

    1: Two weeks to build your list

    • Set your non-negotiables

    • Draft your likely, target, and reach buckets

    • Remove any school you wouldn’t attend

    2: Two to four weeks to research deeply

    • Fill in your notes for each school

    • Attend a webinar or student panel for your top choices

    • Confirm costs using net price calculators when possible

    3: Finalize and prepare

    • Lock your final list

    • Track requirements in one place (deadlines, essays, letters, portfolios)

    • Start essays with stories, not speeches—small moments that show who you are

    For San Diego and Southern California students juggling sports, jobs, family responsibilities, or multiple activities, the key is consistency over intensity. A calm college search is usually built with small weekly steps, not last-minute marathons.

    One more mindset shift that helps: you’re not searching for one “perfect” school. You’re building a set of great options where you can succeed in different ways. That’s what takes the pressure off.

    At College Planning Source, we help students and families navigate every step of the college admissions process. Get direct one-on-one guidance with a complimentary virtual college planning assessment—call 858-676-0700 or schedule online at collegeplanningsource.com/assessments. 

    Source link

  • College Students Stress About Cost of Living Postgraduation

    College Students Stress About Cost of Living Postgraduation

    Graduation typically brings feelings of jubilation, but with the high cost of living and a competitive job market facing college graduates, students report feeling more anxious about their future prospects.

    A recent Student Voice survey by Inside Higher Ed and Generation Lab found that nearly one in five college students say their top stressor is affording life after graduation. A similar share worry that they don’t have enough internship or work experience to be successful. 

    The survey, fielded in August, includes responses from over 5,000 college students, including 1,000 two-year and nearly 2,000 first-generation college students. 

    “Stability is really important to this generation of job-seekers,” said Shawn VanDerziel, chief executive officer at the National Association of Colleges and Employers, citing the organization’s own student surveys. “For the last several years, students regularly report to us that, in their first job, the most important thing is stability.”

    That means having a reasonable living standard as well as an employer who provides sufficient benefits, work-life balance and assurances against layoffs, VanDerziel said.

    Christine Cruzvergara, chief education officer of the job board Handshake, said the trend doesn’t surprise her because it mirrors similar data her organization collected earlier this year, which found that AI, changes to federal policy and a competitive job market are among the factors impeding students’ confidence after graduation.

    “The cost-of-living piece is very real,” Cruzvergara said. “That is, anecdotally, something that we do hear from students, even in the four-year space: ‘Everything is so expensive; I don’t know how I’m going to be able to live.’”

    Nationally, the American public is feeling strained financially. A recent McKinsey survey found that 45 percent of consumers said “rising prices or inflation” is their top concern; an additional 24 percent pointed to their “ability to make ends meet,” and 19 percent cited job security and unemployment.

    “I know no one is going to hire me in an economy like this,” one student at New Mexico State University–Dona Ana wrote in the “other” response option on the Student Voice survey.

    The cost-of-living squeeze has pushed more graduates to consider housing and grocery prices when selecting a city to live in.

    “In the past, you may have found other things that have risen to the top, like vibrant nightlife, environmental issues, recreation. All those things are still on the list, but cost of living is No. 1 in the minds of graduates today,” VanDerziel said.

    Handshake has seen more applicants looking toward smaller markets, or “B-list cities,” for their first destination after college, “because you might be able to get a good enough job that you can actually have the quality of life that you’re looking for at the same time,” Cruzvergara said.

    Internships needed: Students’ perception that they lack skills and experience points to a growing need for higher education leaders to provide work-based learning to prepare students for the workforce. Some institutions now guarantee experiential learning or internships as part of their strategic plans, Cruzvergara said.

    “I’m pleased to hear that students are concerned about internship opportunities, because that tells me that they are in tune with what’s happening in the world and the fact that employers see internship experience as being the best of everything,” VanDerziel said.

    Four-year students are more likely to have enrolled in college directly after graduating from high school, which could explain why this group of students is more likely to fret about their lack of work experience, Cruzvergara said.

    “If they didn’t do an internship, or they only did a part-time job in the summer, they might feel as if they’re at a disadvantage because they haven’t been in a more traditional white-collar work environment,” Cruzvergara said. 

    Older students (25 and up) or those who have worked full-time were less likely to cite anxieties over a lack of work or internship experience, despite being statistically less likely to complete an internship while in college. Handshake data from earlier this year found that about one in eight students have not participated in an internship and do not expect to before finishing their degree, in large part due to time constraints caused by other work or homework, or because they weren’t selected for an internship role.

    While some employers value all work equally, others believe it’s important for students to have work experiences specific to their intended professions, VanDerziel said.

    A soft landing: College and university career centers can help address some of students’ anxieties about graduation by connecting them to employers the traditional way at career fairs, Cruzvergara said.

    “In the face of emerging AI in more industries, roles and sectors, I actually find that what’s become really quite popular again for students in order to get a job or an internship is good old-fashioned networking,” Cruzvergara said.

    Attendance at networking and employer-led events hosted on Handshake (either virtual or for registration purposes) has tripled this year, according to the job board’s data.

    “I know it’s not new; career centers have been doing this for a long time, but do we need to do it more? Do we need to do it in a different way?” Cruzvergara said.

    Colleges should also consider their own departments as employers to host interns.

    “The school is a business in and of itself that has all these different functions,” Cruzvergara pointed out. “So how are you creating an internship within your own finance department? How are you creating an internship within your own legal department?”

    Source link

  • Most superintendents satisfied with job, despite the stress and demands

    Most superintendents satisfied with job, despite the stress and demands

    This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

    The school superintendent’s role has grown more complex and demanding over the past five years with unprecedented pressures around funding, staffing, safety and politics, as well as the continuing commitment to students’ academic growth and well-being, a mid-decade survey of superintendents shows. 

    The survey of 1,095 superintendents, conducted by AASA, The School Superintendents Association, was the first update since the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted in-person learning and caused dips in academic achievement. 

    It’s also the first survey in AASA’S American Superintendent study series since a record number of school shootings early in the 2020s spawned fears of safety and heightened efforts to safeguard campuses. And that’s all in addition to the emergence of culture wars over books bans and diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

    “I think my colleagues would tell you that the civility in communication to public officials plummeted, and I think people just felt that pressure,” said David Law, AASA president and superintendent of Minnesota’s Minnetonka Public School District. Law spoke during a Thursday briefing about the survey results. “This report about how hard the job is, it doesn’t surprise me. It’s a different job.”

    An adult sits at a desk. Two students are nearby by and everyone is smiling

    David Law is superintendent of Minnesota’s Minnetonka Public School District and president of AASA.

    Retrieved from Minnetonka Public Schools on December 04, 2025

     

    Despite the challenges and the fact that the vast majority of superintendents reported at least moderate stress levels, a similarly high proportion of respondents said they were satisfied or very satisfied with their current superintendency. Watching students grow and succeed was superintendents’ greatest fulfillment, according to survey results.

    Some 89% of superintendents said they were currently satisfied or very satisfied in their job, down slightly from 92% in 2020. Additionally, 59% of respondents said they planned on staying in the superintendency in the next five years. That’s up from 51% in 2010. 

    AASA’s national decennial studies began a century ago, in 1923. The most recent survey, which was conducted in fall 2024, covered superintendents from 49 states representing rural, suburban and urban districts of various student counts, although 70% of respondents worked in districts with fewer than 3,000 students.

    Areas of strengths and challenges

    As CEOs of their districts, superintendents have to deal with a broad scope of responsibilities. The survey found that superintendents were most likely to identify their areas of strength as an instructional leader or visionary for their district (40%) and for fostering a positive district and school climate (35%). The least common areas of strength cited were in crisis management (15%) and managing the daily politics of the job (14%).

    When asked to pick up to five issues that consume the bulk of their time, most respondents said finance (54%), followed by personnel management (44%), superintendent-board relationships (41%), facility planning and management (41%), and conflict management (39%).

    The top two issues that superintendents said most frequently prevented them from doing their core work as an educational leader in the past year were state bureaucracy and mandates (53%) and federal bureaucracy and mandates (40%). Other leading obstacles included social media issues (35%) and political divisions in the community (29%). 

    When asked to state the biggest problem facing public schools in their district, superintendents most often answered funding, followed by politics and staffing. 

    Support from communities

    A high percentage of superintendents overall said they felt somewhat or very supported by their communities (91%). However, the range varied by district size, with 88% of leaders of districts with fewer than 1,000 students reporting such support, compared to at least 94% at districts enrolling between 3,000 to 24,999 students and those in districts of 50,000 students and more.

    Source link

  • K-12 districts are fighting ransomware, but IT teams pay the price

    K-12 districts are fighting ransomware, but IT teams pay the price

    Key points:

    The education sector is making measurable progress in defending against ransomware, with fewer ransom payments, dramatically reduced costs, and faster recovery rates, according to the fifth annual Sophos State of Ransomware in Education report from Sophos.

    Still, these gains are accompanied by mounting pressures on IT teams, who report widespread stress, burnout, and career disruptions following attacks–nearly 40 percent of the 441 IT and cybersecurity leaders surveyed reported dealing with anxiety.

    Over the past five years, ransomware has emerged as one of the most pressing threats to education–with attacks becoming a daily occurrence. Primary and secondary institutions are seen by cybercriminals as “soft targets”–often underfunded, understaffed, and holding highly sensitive data. The consequences are severe: disrupted learning, strained budgets, and growing fears over student and staff privacy. Without stronger defenses, schools risk not only losing vital resources but also the trust of the communities they serve.

    Indicators of success against ransomware

    The new study demonstrates that the education sector is getting better at reacting and responding to ransomware, forcing cybercriminals to evolve their approach. Trending data from the study reveals an increase in attacks where adversaries attempt to extort money without encrypting data. Unfortunately, paying the ransom remains part of the solution for about half of all victims. However, the payment values are dropping significantly, and for those who have experienced data encryption in ransomware attacks, 97 percent were able to recover data in some way. The study found several key indicators of success against ransomware in education:

    • Stopping more attacks: When it comes to blocking attacks before files can be encrypted, both K-12 and higher education institutions reported their highest success rate in four years (67 percent and 38 percent of attacks, respectively).
    • Following the money: In the last year, ransom demands fell 73 percent (an average drop of $2.83M), while average payments dropped from $6M to $800K in lower education and from $4M to $463K in higher education.
    • Plummeting cost of recovery: Outside of ransom payments, average recovery costs dropped 77 percent in higher education and 39 percent in K-12 education. Despite this success, K-12 education reported the highest recovery bill across all industries surveyed.

    Gaps still need to be addressed

    While the education sector has made progress in limiting the impact of ransomware, serious gaps remain. In the Sophos study, 64 percent of victims reported missing or ineffective protection solutions; 66 percent cited a lack of people (either expertise or capacity) to stop attacks; and 67 percent admitted to having security gaps. These risks highlight the critical need for schools to focus on prevention, as cybercriminals develop new techniques, including AI-powered attacks.

    Highlights from the study that shed light on the gaps that still need to be addressed include:

    • AI-powered threats: K-12 education institutions reported that 22 percent of ransomware attacks had origins in phishing. With AI enabling more convincing emails, voice scams, and even deepfakes, schools risk becoming test grounds for emerging tactics.
    • High-value data: Higher education institutions, custodians of AI research and large language model datasets, remain a prime target, with exploited vulnerabilities (35 percent) and security gaps the provider was not aware of (45 percent) as leading weaknesses that were exploited by adversaries.
    • Human toll: Every institution with encrypted data reported impacts on IT staff. Over one in four staff members took leave after an attack, nearly 40 percent reported heightened stress, and more than one-third felt guilt they could not prevent the breach.

    “Ransomware attacks in education don’t just disrupt classrooms, they disrupt communities of students, families, and educators,” said Alexandra Rose, director of CTU Threat Research at Sophos. “While it’s encouraging to see schools strengthening their ability to respond, the real priority must be preventing these attacks in the first place. That requires strong planning and close collaboration with trusted partners, especially as adversaries adopt new tactics, including AI-driven threats.”

    Holding on to the gains

    Based on its work protecting thousands of educational institutions, Sophos experts recommend several steps to maintain momentum and prepare for evolving threats:

    • Focus on prevention: The dramatic success of lower education in stopping ransomware attacks before encryption offers a blueprint for broader public sector organizations. Organizations need to couple their detection and response efforts with preventing attacks before they compromise the organization.
    • Secure funding: Explore new avenues such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission’s E-Rate subsidies to strengthen networks and firewalls, and the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre initiatives, including its free cyber defense service for schools, to boost overall protection. These resources help schools both prevent and withstand attacks.
    • Unify strategies: Educational institutions should adopt coordinated approaches across sprawling IT estates to close visibility gaps and reduce risks before adversaries can exploit them.
    • Relieve staff burden: Ransomware takes a heavy toll on IT teams. Schools can reduce pressure and extend their capabilities by partnering with trusted providers for managed detection and response (MDR) and other around-the-clock expertise.
    • Strengthen response: Even with stronger prevention, schools must be prepared to respond when incidents occur. They can recover more quickly by building robust incident response plans, running simulations to prepare for real-world scenarios, and enhancing readiness with 24/7/365 services like MDR.

    Data for the State of Ransomware in Education 2025 report comes from a vendor-agnostic survey of 441 IT and cybersecurity leaders – 243 from K-12 education and 198 from higher education institutions hit by ransomware in the past year. The organizations surveyed ranged from 100-5,000 employees and across 17 countries. The survey was conducted between January and March 2025, and respondents were asked about their experience of ransomware over the previous 12 months.

    This press release originally appeared online.

    Latest posts by eSchool Media Contributors (see all)

    Source link

  • Student Wellbeing in the AI Era: Stress, Confidence, and Connection – A Global Snapshot

    Student Wellbeing in the AI Era: Stress, Confidence, and Connection – A Global Snapshot

    • This HEPI blog was authored by Isabelle Bristow, Managing Director UK and Europe at Studiosity.

    Studiosity’s ninth annual Student Wellbeing Survey, conducted by YouGov in November 2024, gathered insights from university students on their experiences and concerns, and made recommendations to senior leaders. This global research included panels from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the UAE, the UK and the US (see below for the country sample size breakdown).

    The report highlights key learning on AI’s rapid integration into higher education and its impact on student wellbeing. The following are the key takeaways, specifically examining country-specific differences in student experiences with AI, alongside broader issues of stress, connection, belonging, and employability.

    AI Adoption and Its Impact

    AI is now a pervasive tool in higher education, with a significant 79% of all students reporting using AI tools for their studies. While usage is high overall, the proportion of students saying they use AI ‘regularly’ to help with assignments shows interesting variations by country:

    • UK: 17%
    • USA: 27%
    • Singapore: 31%
    • UAE: 38%

    This greater scepticism towards AI among UK students also shows up elsewhere, with students in the UK least likely among the eight countries to expect their university to offer AI tools.

    However, the widespread adoption of AI tools is linked to considerable student stress. The survey found that 68% of students report experiencing personal stress as a result of using AI tools for their coursework. From free text comments, this might be for a number of reasons, including the fear they might be unintentionally breaking the rules; there are also concerns that universities are not moving fast enough to provide AI tools, leaving students to work out for themselves how best to use AI tools. This highlights that navigating the effective and appropriate use of AI is a significant challenge that requires support.

    Furthermore, the way AI is currently being used appears to be affecting students’ confidence in their own learning. Some 61% feel only ‘moderately’ or less confident that they are genuinely learning and improving their own skills when using generative AI.

    Perhaps as a result of this uncertainty, students often seek ‘confidence’ when using university-provided AI support, desiring guided tools that help them check their understanding and validate their genuine learning progress. This motivation was particularly strong in countries like:

    • New Zealand: 31%
    • Australia: 25%
    • UK: 25%

    This suggests a tension between unstructured AI use (linked to lower learning confidence) and the student desire for confidence-building support (which AI, when properly designed for learning, offers).

    Perceptions of how well universities are adapting to AI also vary globally, with 56% of students overall feeling their institutions are adapting quickly enough. However, scepticism is notably higher in certain regions:

    • UK: 53% feel institutions are not adapting fast enough
    • Canada: 52% feel institutions are not adapting fast enough

    Conversely, students in other countries feel their university is adapting fast enough to include AI support tools for study:

    • UAE: 72%
    • Singapore: 66%
    • Saudi Arabia: 65%
    • USA: 58%

    Study Stress: Beyond AI

    While AI contributes to stress, study stress is a broader, multi-faceted challenge for student wellbeing, with frequency and causes differing significantly across countries. Students reported experiencing stress most commonly on a weekly basis (29% overall), with more students than average in Australia and New Zealand (both 33%) experiencing stress on a weekly basis. However, the intensity increases elsewhere:

    • Saudi Arabia: 27% felt stressed daily
    • Canada: 24% felt stressed daily, and a notable 17% felt stressed constantly
    • USA: 16% felt stressed constantly

    The top reasons for general study stress also vary, pointing to the diverse pressures students face:

    • ‘Fear of failing’: significantly higher in the UK (61%) compared with the global average of 52%
    • ‘Not having enough time to balance other life commitments’: significantly higher in the UK (52%) and Australia (48%)
    • ‘Difficult course content’: Singapore (38%)
    • ‘Paying for degree’: Canada (35%) and the USA (31%)
    • ‘Sticking to the rules around integrity and plagiarism’: over-indexed in the UAE (23%) and Saudi Arabia (22%)

    Belonging and Connection

    A sense of belonging is a crucial component of student wellbeing, and the survey revealed variations across countries. Students in Australia (62%) and the UK (65%) reported lower overall belonging levels compared to the global average. What contributes to belonging also differs:

    • ‘Confidence to reach out to teachers’: significantly higher factor in the UK (64%)
    • ‘A flexible schedule to help balance work and study’: dominated as a top reason in Australia (63%) and Singapore (62%)
    • ‘Ease of connecting with a student mentor’: featured prominently in Saudi Arabia (47%), UAE (48%), and USA (43%)
    • ‘Access to mental health support’: over-indexed as a key reason for belonging in Saudi Arabia (47%) and Canada (44%)

    The study also explored direct connections, addressing concerns that AI might reduce human interaction. Students were largely neutral or unsure if generative AI impacted their interactions with peers and teachers (including 63% of students in the UK and 55% in New Zealand). In contrast, students in Saudi Arabia (64%) and the UAE (61%) were most likely to report more interaction due to AI use, followed by Singapore (42%) and the USA (41%).

    Beyond AI’s influence on connection, the survey found that four in ten students (42%) were not provided a mentor in their first year, although over half (55%) would have liked one. Difficulty asking questions of other students was also mentioned by one in ten (13%) students overall. This difficulty was reported more by:

    • Female students: 14% vs 10% for males
    • Older cohorts (50+ year olds): 18% vs 13% for 18-25 year olds
    • Students in the UK (17%), Australia (17%), and New Zealand (16%) compared to other regions.

    Employability Confidence

    Employability is another key area impacting student confidence and overall wellbeing as they look towards the future. The survey found that 59% of students are confident in securing a job within six months of graduation, an increase from 55% in 2024, though concerns remain higher in Canada and the UK. Overall, 74% agree their degree is developing necessary future job skills, although Canadian students were less confident here (68%). Specific concerns about the relevance of a job within six months were more pronounced among:

    • UK students: 20% disagree they will get a related job
    • Canadian students: 14% disagree

    Conclusion

    The YouGov-Studiosity survey provides valuable data highlighting the complex reality of student wellbeing in the current higher education landscape. Rapid AI adoption brings new sources of stress and impacts confidence in learning, adding to existing pressures from general study demands, financial concerns, belonging, connection, and employability anxieties. These challenges, and what supports students most effectively, vary significantly by country. Universities must respond to this complex picture by developing tailored support frameworks that guide students in navigating AI effectively, while also bolstering their sense of belonging, facilitating connections, addressing mental health needs, and supporting their confidence in future careers, in ways responsive to diverse national contexts.

    By country totals: Australia n= 1,234: Canada n= 1,042: New Zealand n= 528: Saudi Arabia n= 511: Singapore n= 1,027: United Arab Emirates n=554: United Kingdom n= 2,328: United States n= 3,000

    You can download further Global Student Wellbeing reports by country here.

    Studiosity is a HEPI Partner. Studiosity is AI-for-Learning, not corrections – to scale student success, empower educators, and improve retention with a proven 4.4x ROI, while ensuring integrity and reducing institutional risk.

    Source link

  • Being the Nurse in the Family: Balancing Caregiving and Self-Care Amidst Grief and Stress – Faculty Focus

    Being the Nurse in the Family: Balancing Caregiving and Self-Care Amidst Grief and Stress – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • Teacher stress levels have surpassed pandemic-era highs

    Teacher stress levels have surpassed pandemic-era highs

    Key points:

    America’s K-12 educators are more stressed than ever, with many considering leaving the profession altogether, according to new survey data from Prodigy Education.

    The Teacher Stress Survey, which polled more than 800 K-12 educators across the U.S., found that nearly half of teachers (45 percent) view the 2024-25 school year as the most stressful of their careers. The surveyed educators were also three times more likely to say that the 2024-25 school year has been the hardest compared to 2020, when they had to teach during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Student behavior challenges (58 percent), low compensation (44 percent), and administrative demands (28 percent) are driving teacher burnout and turnover at alarming rates. Public school teachers were more likely to report stress from unrealistic workloads, large class sizes, school safety concerns, and student behavior issues than their private school counterparts.

    “The fact that stress levels for so many teachers have exceeded those of the pandemic era should be a wake-up call,” said Dr. Josh Prieur, director of education enablement at Prodigy Education and former assistant principal in the U.S. public school system. “Teachers need tangible, meaningful, and sustained support … every week of the year.”

    Additional key findings include:

    • The vast majority of teachers (95 percent) are experiencing some level of stress, with more than two-thirds (68 percent) reporting moderate to very high stress. K-5 teachers were the most likely to feel extremely/very stressed (33 percent). Sixty-three percent of teachers report that their current stress levels are higher than when they first started teaching. 
    • Nearly one in 10 teachers surveyed (9 percent) are planning to leave the profession this year, while nearly one in four (23 percent) are actively thinking about it. One-third of teachers do not expect to be teaching three years from now, likely because nearly half (48 percent) of teachers don’t feel appreciated for the work that they do.
    • Teachers are finding ways to prioritize their well-being, but time limits and job pressures often get in the way. Seventy-eight percent of teachers say they actively make time for self-care, but nearly half (43 percent) feel guilty for spending time on self-care and 78 percent have skipped self-care due to work demands. Implementing school-provided self-care perks and mandatory self-care breaks would appeal to teachers, with 85 percent and 76 percent taking advantage of each benefit, respectively.
    • Top solutions that would reduce teachers’ stress include a higher salary (59 percent), a four-day school week (33 percent), stronger classroom discipline policies (32 percent), and smaller class sizes (25 percent). Public school teachers were more likely to prefer a shorter week, while private school educators opted for higher pay. 

    “Teacher Appreciation Week should serve as the starting point for building systems that show we value teachers’ time, talent, and well-being,” said Dr. Prieur. “Districts can do this by investing in tools that reduce the burden on teachers, prioritizing time for self-care and implementing policies that reinforce teachers’ value as an ongoing commitment to bettering the profession.”

    This press release originally appeared online.

    Laura Ascione
    Latest posts by Laura Ascione (see all)

    Source link

  • Taking Grades (Stress) Out of Learning – Faculty Focus

    Taking Grades (Stress) Out of Learning – Faculty Focus

    Source link

  • “Am I Sure?” — A Mindful Question to Reduce Stress & Gain Perspective (Dr. Ryan Niemiec, VIA Strengths)

    “Am I Sure?” — A Mindful Question to Reduce Stress & Gain Perspective (Dr. Ryan Niemiec, VIA Strengths)

    How often do we let our assumptions add to our stress—without even realizing it? In this short video, Dr. Ryan Niemiec invites us to pause and ask one simple, powerful question: “Am I sure?” By gently challenging our perceptions, we create space for clarity, balance, and authenticity. Learn how mindfulness and the character strength of Perspective can help reduce stress and bring you back to what truly matters.

    Source link